1 / 15

F.E.C. Theory: understanding how adult learners learn

F.E.C. Theory: understanding how adult learners learn. Michele Pinnock Cluster 30 ITDE. Introduction. This proposed theory seeks to explain how mature entry student-teachers learn.

ondrea
Download Presentation

F.E.C. Theory: understanding how adult learners learn

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. F.E.C. Theory: understanding how adult learners learn Michele Pinnock Cluster 30 ITDE

  2. Introduction This proposed theory seeks to explain how mature entry student-teachers learn. This theory seeks to conceptualize learning and to describe the environment in which it is to occur, in a bid to guarantee meaningful learning.

  3. How do Mature LearnersLEARN ? FOCUS EXAMINE CONNECT The learner will FOCUS after being stimulated by the environment, causing neurones in the brain to be stimulated. This will cause the brain to EXAMINE the just arrived knowledge in order to interpret and identify congruence and dissonance with their existing network. The learner will then CONNECT this new information with existing information or make adjustments to existing information.

  4. UNDERSTANDING THE LAMP FRAMEWORK

  5. Components of F.E.C • LEARNERS • AUTHENTIC LEARNING ENVIRONMENT • METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES • PROVIDE SUPPORT

  6. Implications of FEC theory onInstruction To guarantee learning, create learning communities that enhance learners’ metacognition skills by engaging them in meaningful learning.

  7. This Theory Recognizes LEARNERS • Learners are unique • That they must be actively involved in constructing their own meaning and • that they must be made conscious of their metacognition. Empirical evidence Directed Perception’ by Minturn & Bruner Students were given sequences of either letter or numbers to look at. When given ambiguous set participants interpreted the number according to their expectations of their ‘set’

  8. This Theory Recognizes AUTHENTIC ENVIRONMENT The learning environment must mirror the real world in order for learners to be able to recognize the significance and relevance of this new knowledge to be learnt.

  9. This Theory Recognizes METACOGNITION as KEY Metacognition is one’s awareness of thinking and the self-regulatory that accompanies this awareness. Here learners will • have to classify their knowledge- what they know and what they don’t. • Talk about thinking (probably in pairs) • Planning and self-regulation • Debriefing the thinking process • Self evaluation

  10. This Theory Recognizes the need to PROVIDE SUPPORT Support in the form of experts whether they be instructors and or peers. These persons will demonstrate through mentoring, modeling and or coaching the skills, attitudes and knowledge needed to succeed. Thus they help to create a learning community.

  11. UNDERSTANDING THE FEC FRAMEWORK

  12. UNDERSTANDING THE FEC FRAMEWORK

  13. UNDERSTANDING THE FEC FRAMEWORK

  14. Operationalizing the FEC Theory of Learning STANDARDS Learning Environment METACOGNITION Self- Confidence Experiences Perception Capabilities Learner AUTHENTIC LEARNING SUPPORT

  15. References Baron, P. (2001). Psychology.5th Ed. Needham Heights,MA: Allyn & Bacon. Berk, L. (1994). Child development.3rd Ed. Needham Heights,MA: Allyn & Bacon. Driscoll, M. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction 2nd Ed. Allyn & Bacon Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (1997). Educational psychology: windows on classrooms 3rd Ed. UpperSaddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Gagne, E., Yekovich, C. & Yekovich, F. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. 2nd Ed. New York: HarperCollins. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Siegler, R. (1981). Children’s thinking 2nd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Thomson, D. & Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak a strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology,86,255-262. Tulving, E. (1979). Relation between encoding specificity and level of processing . In L. Cremak & F. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

More Related