1 / 19

Local Utility of Cost Benefit Analysis

Local Utility of Cost Benefit Analysis. By: Erin Dalton, Allegheny County, PA. AGENDA. How we got here Recent cost benefit studies Current project. Jail Collaborative Structure. Jail Collaborative’s 3 Strategies. 5. Reentry Center Discharge Center Release w/in 48 hours

oneida
Download Presentation

Local Utility of Cost Benefit Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Local Utility of Cost Benefit Analysis By: Erin Dalton, Allegheny County, PA

  2. AGENDA How we got here Recent cost benefit studies Current project

  3. Jail Collaborative Structure

  4. Jail Collaborative’s 3 Strategies 5

  5. Reentry Center Discharge Center Release w/in 48 hours Screening & Assessment RFP for Evidence Based Programs Treatment pods DUI Hotel Criminal Court Case Review One Judge, one defendant Postponements reduced IT infrastructure to capture reentry programs Current projects • Reentry Second Chance Act Adult Demonstration Second Chance Reentry Court Grant RWJ Family Support • Justice Reinvestment First set of county-sites State site • IT Development • Cost Benefit Analysis

  6. DATA WAREHOUSE • Allegheny County Housing Authority • Allegheny County Jail • Allegheny County Coroner • Department of Public Welfare • Housing Authority City of Pittsburgh • Juvenile Probation • Pittsburgh Public Schools • Adult Probation • Pretrial Services • Criminal Court • • Children, Youth and Families • • Aging • • Drug & Alcohol • • Early Intervention • Mental Health • Intellectual Disabilities • Family Support Centers • • HeadStart • • Human Services Development Fund • • Homelessness & Housing • • Low Income House Energy Assistance • Program • • System of Care Initiative

  7. COST BENEFIT STUDIES • Mental Health Court • Jail Collaborative • Costing Policy Options, Justice Reinvestment

  8. MENTAL Health court Findings http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/2007/RAND_TR439.pdf

  9. Findings • Diversion successful • Short term: not more expensive • Longer term: saves money • “In the short run, the more effective MHC is at reducing incarceration, the more expensive it is to taxpayers” http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/2007/RAND_TR439.pdf

  10. Critical issues • Where costs/benefits accrue • Level of government • Individuals • External estimates • Costs of crimes • Criminal careers • Costs of criminal justice system versus treatment

  11. Jail collaborative evaluation • Allegheny County is saving over $5.3 million/yr • Greatest cost-savings generated in areas of reduced victimization among county residents • Cost-savings ratio is approximately 6 to 1 • At 12 months post-release, the Collaborative inmates achieve a 50% lower recidivism rate compared to matched comparison group • No significant differences in the recidivism between Black and White inmates

  12. Methods • Cost of jail stay • Cost of processing offenders in the criminal justice system • Costs of crime victimization • Cost of providing services at the jail • Cost savings associated with Collaborative participants’ recidivism reduction The greatest cost-savings generated areas of public safety and reduced victimization among county residents – 86 percent of total cost savings.

  13. Costing policy options • Reduce ALOS by an average of one day to produce a 1.7% reduction in jail bed days • This is the equivalent of 17,929 days and $1,290,888* Urban Institute Presentation to Allegheny County

  14. Cost benefit analysis – building capacity

  15. School based probation – quantifying outcomes

  16. Day reporting centers – identifying goals and outcomes

  17. system wide measures and goals • Agreement around Costs • Understanding of cost-benefit analysis throughout the county • Process to incorporate better data into decision-making

  18. innovations

  19. innovations http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/10-08-1201.pdf

More Related