1 / 19

Presentation Plan

Performances study of interferometric radar altimeters: from the instrument to the global mission definition. Vivien Enjolras (1,5) , Patrick Vincent (2) , Jean-Claude Souyris (1) , Ernesto Rodriguez (3) , Laurent Phalippou (4) , Bruno Cugny (1) , Anny Cazenave (1,5)

opa
Download Presentation

Presentation Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Performances study of interferometric radar altimeters: from the instrument to the global mission definition Vivien Enjolras(1,5), Patrick Vincent(2), Jean-Claude Souyris(1), Ernesto Rodriguez(3), Laurent Phalippou(4), Bruno Cugny(1), Anny Cazenave(1,5) (1) CNES, 18 av. Edouard Belin, 31055 Toulouse Cedex 4, France (2) IFREMER, 155 rue Jean Jacques Rousseau, 92138 Issy les Moulineaux, France (3) JPL, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA (4) ALCATEL ALENIA SPACE, 28, av. Jean François Champollion, 31000 Toulouse, France (5) LEGOS, 14 av. Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France

  2. Presentation Plan • Recall of the context of the study • Geometry of the measurement • Physics of the measurement • Impact of external errors in the swaths: platform attitude (yaw and roll angles), propagation media (ionosphere and wet troposphere) • Data simulation over a real phenomenon: December 2003 tsunami • Proposition of an operating point for such an instrument Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 2/19

  3. Context of the study • WSOA about to be embarked on Jason 2 mission as a demonstrator • Main scientific objectives: 2D topography of the oceans, and catching of meso scale phenomena thanks to its spatial resolution • In this context, studies have been performed on such an instrument and its adaptation on a platform as the Jason 2 one to get a global error budget • Unfortunately, WSOA was cancelled in 2005 • The outcomes have led to the proposition of a new operating point Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 3/19

  4. Geometry of the measurement (1/2) • Off-nadir bi-polar observation by two passive antennae • Low look angles: compromise between a wide swath and good power return on water • Both swaths hits mechanically done with the feed’s position Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 4/19

  5. Geometry of the measurement (2/2) • Knowledge of 4 main parameters required: altitude H (Doris, GPS), range r1 (onboard clock), interferometric phase Φ (onboard calculator) and roll angle α (a priori ACS) • Need to move to a useful reference frame, adapted to oceanography Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 5/19

  6. Physics of the measurement (1/2) • Channels’ signals coherence characterizes the quality of the interferometric phase measurement • 3 main sources of signals decorrelation : • Speckle: onboard correction • Thermal Noise: Main one • Range Migration: negligible at low angles • Need to have a very accurate knowledge of the link budget • Height error directly related to the interferometric phase error • Single Look Height Error non adapted to oceanographic applications Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 6/19

  7. Physics of the measurement (2/2) • Necessity to have a multilooking process (onboard to lower the telemetry budget): study of different scenarios • Application on the nominal case WSOA on Jason 2 Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 7/19

  8. Impact of external errors : Attitude (1/6) • Need of a yaw control on repetitive orbit like the Jason one (around 80 % of mission lifetime) • Direct impact on the geometry of the swath and related sampling • Loss of coverage, getting worse when the Sun is far from the orbital plane (angle from 0° to 66° + 23,15° = 89.15°) • 6 period of 12 days every year are optimal with a null yaw and 84 km swath Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 8/19

  9. Impact of external errors : Attitude (2/6) • Yaw period slightly different from orbit period: yaw doesn’t remain the same over an area cycle after cycle (crossovers and overlap impact) • Only a Sun Synchronous orbit can cope with this effect, almost erasing the platform yaw motion • Going Sun Synchronous also offers a gain about 70 % in the dragging surface, lowering the rhythm of maneuvers, and enabling some possible altitude reduction New Operating Point : • Sun Synchronous Orbit • Altitude Reduction Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 9/19

  10. YA XD XA YD Impact of external errors : Attitude (3/6) • Impact of the misknowledge of the roll angle in the swath • Estimation process at crossovers, assuming a linear evolution on a short time • Crossovers selection (time delay less than 5 days to deal with the ocean decorrelation) • Study of the impact of different factors (orbit, swath sampling, nadir altimeter data) on the quality of the estimation Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 10/19

  11. Impact of external errors : Roll angle (4/6) • The shorter the orbit cycle, the better the estimation • Nadir measurements are not indispensable, but still improves the estimation slightly • A thinner sampling gives more measurements, but noisier; it still improves the estimation Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 11/19

  12. Impact of external errors : Ionosphere (5/6) • Nadir dual-frequency altimeter estimation of the ionospheric delay • No delay estimation through the swath: added residual errors to consider • Ionospheric wavelengths of hundreds of kilometers: mean residual errors negligible • Only interests in the worst cases, around the tropics at certain periods • Use of daily worldwide GPS data for the study Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 12/19

  13. Impact of external errors : Troposphere (6/6) • Identical problem with the wet tropospheric delay • Use of SSMI data • Non negligible zonal mean residual errors, especially in the tropics • Maximum errors can reach 4 cm in the worst case • Through a large perturbation, more than 50 % of the errors in the Far Range are greater than 1 cm, and around 20 % are greater than 1.5 cm by the Middle Range • Possible need to use external data in the ground processing to improve the media budget Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 13/19

  14. Overall Budget: WSOA Nominal Case • Overall Performances study first nominally applied on WSOA on Jason 2 • Best and Worst Cases refer to attitude and propagation media errors • Post-processing pixels of 16*14 km are considered • Overall Budget between 5 and 9 cm: contribution of the instrument error budget about 55 % • Possibility to look at a new operating point, more adapted Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 14/19

  15. Data Simulation: December 2004 Tsunami • Show the interest of a 2D topography mapping • No proof of a warning system • Simulation of a radar altimeter interferometer onboard T/P and Jason when they flew over the Indian Ocean (nominal case 16*14 km pixel) • Yaw configuration tested • In nominal mode, the 2D information results in a good knowledge of the direction and the amplitude of the wave • In attitude worst cases, measurements come close to nadir ones Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 15/19

  16. New Operating Point Research (1/3) • Scientific Objectives: identical to WSOA ones, plus the constraint of a global coverage • Orbit: Move to a sun-synchronous orbit (decrease the altitude to improve the link budget) • TWTA (tube amplifier) and antennae kept • 10 meters mast: no more Jason 2 constraint • Frequency: Ku band to keep the same feeds and antennae as Jason 2 • Nadir Altimeter: Kept especially for the ionospheric correction (dual-frequency) and intercalibration • PRF per antenna: half the nadir altimeter PRF (around 1000 Hz sufficient) • Bandwidth: as WSOA, sufficient for the range resolution required (drawback for the link budget if increased) • Pulse length: TWTA enables an increasing, assuming more telemetry (low cost) Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 16/19

  17. New Operating Point Research (2/3) • 14 days sun synchronous orbit at 815 km with 84 km swaths covers more than 99 % of the world between -81 º and 81º • More than 42 % or areas between -60 and 60 hit more than 3 times per cycle • Only Drawback: tidal aliasing! Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 17/19

  18. New Operating Point Research (3/3) Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 18/19

  19. Conclusion • Few changes in the WSOA operating point can improve the overall budget • Strong need to move to a sun-synchronous orbit • Global coverage possible in 14 days • 4 to 5 cm height RMS obtained on 12*4 km pixels • Possible use of external data (GPS and SSMI) • Even if errors stronger than nadir altimeter errors and partly correlated in the swath, we have access to a 2D topography (see tsunami) • Error budget can be improved by integrating overlapping over whole mission lifetime • These instruments should be part of the future of altimetry • Paper just published in Journal SENSORS Special Issue on Altimetry http://www.mdpi.org/sensors Vivien ENJOLRAS “15 Years of Altimetry”, Venice, 13-16 March 2006 19/19

More Related