150 likes | 297 Views
LS1 Days Report from Vacuum , Surfaces and Coatings (VSC) group Technology Department (TE) José Miguel JIMENEZ. Main topics. LS1 coordination TE-VSC Plan Items Implications for TE-VSC Impacts to other Groups TE-VSC Group contributions Resource status Closing remarks.
E N D
LS1 DaysReport from Vacuum, Surfacesand Coatings (VSC) groupTechnology Department (TE) José Miguel JIMENEZ TE-VSC
Main topics • LS1 coordination • TE-VSC Plan Items • Implications for TE-VSC • Impacts to other Groups • TE-VSC Group contributions • Resource status • Closing remarks TE-VSC
TE-VSC Plan itemsImplications for TE-VSC (1/2) • 161 Plan Items entered (2012-06-09 @ 21:54) • 17need ECRs #Items % • P0 14 8.7 • P1 6137.9 • P2 40 24.8 • P3 42 26.1 • P4 4 2.5 • P0+P1+P2 represent 71%of the requests • LHC represents 50% of the requests • Status in plan.cern.ch • 91involve only TE-VSC • 70require support from other groups TE-VSC
TE-VSC Plan itemsImplications for TE-VSC (2/2) • Manpower • 50FTEs required (TE-VSC) #FTE % • P0 8.7 17.9 • P1 22.245.5 • P2 8.0 16.5 • P3 9.1 18.8 • P4 0.6 1.3 • P0+P1+P2 represent 80% of theTE-VSC Manpower • LHC represent 40% of the TE-VSC Manpower TE-VSC
TE-VSC Plan itemsImpact to other groups • 161Plan Items entered (2012-06-09 @ 21:54) • 70need support from other groups #Items % • P0 Total 4 5.7 • P1 Total 31 44.3 • P2 Total 17 24.3 • P3 Total 16 22.9 • P4 Total 2 2.9 • 10Groups are asked to support TE-VSC #Items % • EN-EL 40 42.6 • BE-ABP 13 13.8 • EN-MME 13 13.8 • EN-HE 12 12.8 • TE-MSC 4 4.3 • DGS-RP 4 4.3 • EN-MEF 3 3.2 • TE-CRG 2 2.1 • EN-CV 2 2.1 • BE-BI 1 1.1 • Status in plan.cern.ch • 3 “Yes” completed • 5 “pending” • 62 “Not filled” TE-VSC
TE-VSC Plan itemsImpact to othergroups: EN-EL case Summary by Accelerators Summary by Accelerators • 20% (614 cables) correspondto the needs for newprojects • 16% correspond to P3 • 34% if cumulated • Replacement of electrical“reglettes” are counted ascables TE-VSC
TE-VSC Group contributions • 145Group contributions received (2012-06-09 @ 21:54) • Ratio by priorities could not be extracted from the tool (important) • 8 Groups are requesting TE-VSC Support #Items % FTE • TE-ABT 36 25 3.5 • BE-RF 34 23 4.1 • BE-BI 28 19 3.2 • EN-STI 26 18 2.8 • BE-ABP 10 7 1.5 • BE-CO 5 3 0.2 • TE-MSC 5 3 0.6 • TE-CRG 1 1 0.2 • Status in plan.cern.ch • 13 “Not filled” checking with requesters • 32 “pending” more detailed needed to complete the filling • 100 “Yes” completed • Resources involved • Manpower: 16 FTEs (excluding support at the surface: vacuum acceptance tests) • Material budget required: 0.5 MCHF(outside the current agreements) TE-VSC
TE-VSC Resource statusManpower availabilities: CERN Staffs & Fellows • 59 VSC Staff deployed in all accelerators from Jan’13 to end March’14 • 15 in the Injectors • 30in the LHC • 14for the Surface treatments & Coatings support Then Injector’s Staff partlyredeployed in the LHC activities as from Feb’14 Engineers Technical Technicians & Physicists Engineers • IVM: 2 1 8 • LBV 3 4 6 • EIV 4 2 6 • ICM 2 3 4 • SCC 2 2 10 • 5 Fellows • 1 in the Injectors • 4 in the LHC 2013 2014 • Controls 1 1 • LHC BV 2 2 • LHC Exp. Areas 1 1 • LHC IV 1 1 TE-VSC
TE-VSC Resource statusManpower availabilities: IS & Collaborations Summary by IS/FSU/PJAS • 57External Support is based on: • 23AL40-30 mainly for LHC activities: mechanics, venting/pump-downsand bake-out installations 2013 2014 • LHC BV 11 11 • LHC IV 10 10 • Injectors 2 2 • 18FSUs for all activities: mechanics, controls, surface treatments, logistics andbake-out installations 2013 2014 • LHC BV 4 4 • LHC PIMs/Exp 2 2 • Controls 8 4.5 • Surface treat. 3.5+2? 3.5+2? • 12Collaboration: vacuum consolidation related to PIMs and Controls 2013 2014 • LHC BV 6 (PL) 6 (PL) 1+1? (ES) 1+1? (ES) • Controls 5 (PL) 5 (PL) • 4 USAS 2013 2014 • Portugal 2 1 • Spain 2 2 TE-VSC
TE-VSC Resource statusMaterial Summary by priorities Summary by Accelerators Material cost 23.8 MCHF (procurements…) LHC represent 66% P3 represent 19% TE-VSC
Closing remarks (1/3) • The ideal sequence would be: • For the arcs • Pre-installation of mobile pumps (sub-sectors with leaks) • Venting to speed up the warming-up • Leak detections • Follow-up of the trains for PIMs & relief valves installation • “independent” schedule for RF ball & rupture disk installations • For the LSS • Venting and removal of equipment belonging to other groups • TE-VSC consolidations • Installation of equipment (coming back or new) • Pump downs and bake-out installations • Bake-out and NEG activations • Removal of vacuum bake-out and cleaning TE-VSC
Closing remarks (2/3)Optimisation of TE-VSC activities… Venting LHC IV Removing equipment TE-VSC consolidations Equipment back Pump down & bake-out inst. Bake-out & NEC activ. TE-VSC
Closing remarks (3/3) • TE-VSC was aware of all most relevant activities • Contacts taken since months with Groups so no big surprises seen in Plan.cern.ch • 121 people (59 Staffs + 5 Fellows + 57 External Support) are required to execute all activities • Schedule issues in LSS5, 6, 7 and 8 • Need a careful preparation with Katy • Material (mobile pumps, bake-out) & co-activities to be analyzed • Budget issues for P3 activities • TE-VSC to revise the impact of LS1 day decisions • Feedback to EN-EL on impact to the communicated DICs • Decrease of the number of cables requested TE-VSC