320 likes | 440 Views
Strategie per ottimizzare il risultato clinico della HAART. Prof. Adriano Lazzarin Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele Milano. Break-study (FTC weekly). Soria A. et al, in press. BENCHMRK-1 and -2 [2]. 100. RAL + OBR. PL + OBR. 80. 63%*. 60. Patients (%). 40. 34%. 20.
E N D
Strategie per ottimizzare il risultato clinico della HAART Prof. Adriano Lazzarin Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele Milano
Break-study (FTC weekly) Soria A. et al, in press
BENCHMRK-1 and -2[2] 100 RAL + OBR PL + OBR 80 63%* 60 Patients (%) 40 34% 20 *P < .001 vs PL 0 0 2 4 8 12 16 24 Weeks MOTIVATE 1[3] DUET 1 and 2[1] 100 100 PL + OBR MVC BID + OBR PL + OBR ETR + OBR 80 80 59%* 49%* *P < .0001 vs PL 60 60 Patients (%) Patients (%) 47%* 41% 40 40 20 20 16% 25% *P < .0001 vs PL 0 0 0 4 8 16 24 32 40 48 0 2 4 8 12 16 24 Weeks Weeks Is VL < 50 Achievable in Treatment-Experienced Patients With MDR HIV? 1. Cahn P, et al. ICAAC. 2007. Abstract H-717. 2. Kumar P, et al. EACS 2007. Abstract P7.2/06. 3. Lalezari J, et al. ICAAC 2007. Abstract H-718a.
MOTIVATE 1 and 2: Virologic Suppression by LPV/RTV Use, Wk 24 100 100 80 80 60 60 Patients (%) Patients (%) 40 40 20 20 0 0 Placebo + OBR MVC QD + OBR MVC BID + OBR HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL 96.3 87.0 74.1 69.6 60.6 60.0 59.8 50.0 47.9 41.7 26.0 22.0 n = 10 27 23 50 94 127 10 27 23 50 94 127 LPV/RTV First Use LPV/RTV Exp/Resistant LPV/RTV First Use LPV/RTV Exp/Resistant van der Ryst E, et al. IAS 2007. Abstract WEPEB115LB.
DUET Week 96: response (VL <50 copies/mL TLOVR) by PSS* 100 etravirine + BR (n=497) Placebo + BR (n=477) 90 p<0.0001 76% 80 p<0.0001 70 61% 59% p<0.0001 60 Patients with VL <50 copies/mL at Week 96 (%) 46% 50 40 29% 30 20 6% 10 5/81 52/181 39/84 117/191 126/215 168/222 0 2 0 1 Number of active background ARVs (PSS) • Patients in the etravirine + BR group achieved consistently higher response rates than patients in the placebo + BR group, irrespective of number of active background agents; the difference was most apparent in patients with no active background agents *DRV considered sensitive if FC 10; ENF counted as sensitive if used de novo; etravirine not included in the PSS calculation; analysis excludes patients who discontinued except for VF Trottier B et al. CAHR 2009. Abstract P148
ICI - TRIAL New scenario in rescue therapy: new naive patients Figure 1 – Trend of the virological and immunological parameters Bars represent first and third quartiles.
Main safety haematological findings in 28 HIV-1 infected failing pts receiving raltegravir, maraviroc and etravirine alone as salvage therapy. Increase of RBC, WBC and PTL N° after the NUCS step
ICI - TRIAL Nozza S et al, submitted
ICI - TRIAL Nozza S et al, submitted
The Next line of drugs for cART in failing MEXP • Elvitegravir • ViiV 572 • Rilpivirine • Bevirimat • Elvucitabine • New NNRTI, and NRTI • Therapeutic vaxins …but mainly recycling of hold drugs active against revertant virus (NA,PI/r, entry inhibitors)
Early decrease in CD38 expression on CD4+ cells on MVC IRIS Zone The kinetics of change in the proportion of CD38+ on CD4+T cells and in the density of of CD38+ on CD4+T cells were similar
To prevent the disease progression in HIV controlled patients that enough a simplified maintenance Rx?
SEMPLIFICATION:a long-term treatment strategy in HIV controller Induction Maintenance strategy 3 drugs required • Which antiviral strength Do we need to maintain full viral suppression • PI/r ? • 2 drugs ? • Others ? 4–5 log drop • Which markers do we use ? • HIV RNA < 50 copies • Viral DNA ? • GSS in DNA ? VL Time Schematic representation; Katlama C, personal communication
Boosting PIs alone: for potency and genetic barrier could be an option for monotherapy in maintenance ART
MONET: Primary Efficacy Analysis:HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48, TLOVR, S = F Per Protocol analysis (PP) Intent to Treat analysis (ITT) Primary analysis • 1.6%; lower limit 95%CI: -10.1% • 1%; lower limit 95%CI: -9.9% 100 87.8% 86.2% 85.3% 84.3% 90 80 HIV RNA <50 by Week 48 (%) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DRV/r + 2NRTI (PP) DRV/r mono (PP) DRV/r + 2NRTI (ITT) DRV/r mono (ITT) N=129 N=123 N=123 N=127 Table EFF 4-5 J. Arribas et al, IAS Conference, Cape Town, SA, 21 July 2009, TUAB106-LB
Elite controller: a selected core of LTNP FINDINGS • HIV RNA (ultrasensitive method) is found in all controller (except one). • High levels of proviral DNA and cell based RNA is proven. Under ART HIV negative Before ART Ln
HIV- HIV+ Primary HIV Infection of Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue (GALT) is the First Pathogenic Event Leading to Substantial CD4+ T cell Destruction and the main source of persistant activation GALT Lymph Nodes Brenchley JM, et al J Exp Med. 2004 Sep 20;200(6):749-59. G. Pantaleo et al., Nature 1994
Response to long-term antiretroviral treatment in 47 HIV+ with HIV-RNA < 1 copies/mL and >500 CD4/mcl F. Cossarini et al, ongoing study
CD38+ cells in HIV-Uninfected and infected subjects after 7 years on treatment
HLA-DR+ cells in HIV uninfected and infected subjects after 7 years on treatment
CD38+ HLA-DR+ Cells in HIV- uninfected and infected ubjects after 7 years on treatment
Conclusions • The study doesn’t show a linear correlation between HIV-1 RNA on treatment and CD38+HLA+ T cells subsets. • HIV-RNA on antiretroviral treatment is therefore not a sufficient stimulus to mantain levels of T cell activation, which does not support the possibility of ongoing rounds of viral replication in the plasma compartment.
Most of the virus is in central memory and transitional memory CD4+ T cells Courtesy of Brigitte Autran