1 / 15

Xun Jiang 1 , Moustafa Chahine 2 , Edward Olsen 2 , Luke Chen 2 , and Yuk Yung 3

Variability of Tropospheric & Stratospheric CO 2 From the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder. Xun Jiang 1 , Moustafa Chahine 2 , Edward Olsen 2 , Luke Chen 2 , and Yuk Yung 3. 1 Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Houston 2 Science Division, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech

orlando-conley
Download Presentation

Xun Jiang 1 , Moustafa Chahine 2 , Edward Olsen 2 , Luke Chen 2 , and Yuk Yung 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Variability of Tropospheric & Stratospheric CO2 From the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder Xun Jiang1, Moustafa Chahine2, Edward Olsen2,Luke Chen2, and Yuk Yung3 1 Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Houston 2 Science Division, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech 3 Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences, Caltech AGU Fall Meeting, Dec 13-17, 2010 1

  2. Overview • Motivation • Data • Variability of Mid-tropospheric CO2 • Trend & Seasonal Cycle • ENSO • Stratospheric CO2 • Conclusions 2

  3. Motivation • Improve understanding of CO2 variability and its effect on the global climate change using satellite data • Investigate how natural variability (e.g., ENSO) influence the global CO2 • Improve CO2 simulations from chemistry-transport models in the future 3

  4. Data – AIRS Mid-Trop CO2 Product AIRS Mid-Trop Contribution Function • AIRS Mid-tropospheric CO2 • Sensitivity Peak: 500-300 hPa (depending upon latitude) • Chahine et al. [2005; 2008] 314 hPa 478 hPa • The AIRS Mid-Trop Contribution Function is a measure of the contribution of an atmospheric layer to the TOA radiance used in the AIRS CO2 retrieval 4

  5. Comparison Between AIRS CO2 With Model Simulation JULY 2003 AIRS • Significant spatiotemporal variability in the AIRS CO2, which is supported by the aircraft observations [Chahine et al., GRL 2008]. • Convective vertical transport flux is important for correct simulation of mid-tropospheric CO2 [Jiang et al., GBC 2008]. GEOS-Chem

  6. Trend and Seasonal Cycle of AIRS CO2 CO2 Trend AIRS: 1.96 ± 0.08 ppm CONTRAIL: 1.96 ± 0.14 ppm Lat: +25º ± 5ºLon: 143º ± 5º CO2 Trend AIRS: 2.07 ± 0.03 ppm CONTRAIL: 1.98 ± 0.05 ppm Lat: -25º ± 5ºLon: 150º ± 5º AIRS Data are 7-day averages; CONTRAIL data are individual measurements Olsen et al., manuscript in preparation [2010]

  7. Influence of El Niño/La Niña on AIRS CO2

  8. Influence of El Niño/La Niña on AIRS CO2 La Niña: Feb 2008 El Niño: Feb 2005 El Niño: Feb 2010

  9. Influences of El Niño on Mid-Trop CO2 From AIRS and MOZART-2 +0.95 ppm +1.56 ppm -0.54 ppm -1.00 ppm +0.59 ppm +1.56 ppm -0.33 ppm -1.00 ppm +0.95 ppm +1.56 ppm -1.12 ppm -1.00 ppm TOP: MOZART-2 CO2 anomaly during El Nino TOP: AIRS detrended and deseasonalized CO2 anomaly averaged for 11 El Nino months MIDDLE: MOZART-2 CO2 anomaly during La Nina MIDDLE: AIRS detrended and deseasonalized CO2 anomaly averaged for 17 La Nina months BOTTOM: MOZART-2 CO2 Difference (El Nino – La Nina) (signal is smaller than observed by AIRS) BOTTOM: AIRS CO2 anomaly difference (El Nino – La Nina) (Consistent with change in Walker Circulation) Jiang, X., M. T. Chahine, E. T. Olsen, L. L. Chen, and Y. L. Yung (2010), Interannual variability of mid-tropospheric CO2 from Atmospheric Infrared Sounder, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L13801, doi:10.1029/2010GL042823 NOTE: MOZART-2 results are preliminary. The boundary conditionis a climatology and does not include interannual variability

  10. Influence of El Niño/La Niña on AIRS CO2 Multiple regression method is applied to the AIRS CO2 data. We decompose CO2 concentrations to trend, annual cycle, semi-annual cycle and ENSO signal.

  11. Data – AIRS Stratospheric CO2 Product • AIRS Stratospheric CO2 • Sensitivity Peak: 20 hPa 23.5 hPa 11

  12. AIRS Stratospheric CO2(CO2 after subtracting <CO2> for |lat| ≤ 4 °) Jan 2003 Color Bar Range: -15 to +15 ppm

  13. Stratospheric CO2 From Models(CO2 after subtracting <CO2> for |lat| ≤ 4 °) 3-D IMATCH 3-D GEOS-Chem Color Bar Range: -5 to +5 ppm 3-D MOZART-2 3-D Carbon Tracker

  14. Conclusions • Significant spatiotemporal variability in the AIRS CO2. • Trend and seasonal cycle of AIRS CO2 agree well with those from CONTRAIL CO2. • Mid-tropospheric AIRS CO2 is modulated by the natural variability (e.g. El Niño). • AIRS stratospheric CO2 offer a new opportunity to constrain the models in the stratosphere. References: Chahine et al., GRL, doi:2005GL024165, 2005. Chahine et al., GRL, doi:2008GL035022, 2008. Jiang et al., GBC, doi:2008GL035022, 2008. Jiang et al., GRL, doi:2010GL042823, 2010. Olsen et al., Manuscript In Preparation, 2010.

  15. Thank you! 15

More Related