1 / 98

Culture Regions

Culture Regions. Urban culture regions Cultural diffusion in the city The cultural ecology of the city Cultural integration and models of the city Urban landscapes. Six processes at work in the city.

ormand
Download Presentation

Culture Regions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Culture Regions • Urban culture regions • Cultural diffusion in the city • The cultural ecology of the city • Cultural integration and models of the city • Urban landscapes

  2. Six processes at work in the city • Concentration — differential distribution of population and economic activities in a city, and the manner in which they have focused on the center of the city • Decentralization — the location of activity away from the central city • Segregation — the sorting out of population groups according to conscious preferences for associating with one group or another through bias and prejudice

  3. Six processes at work in the city • Specialization — similar to segregation only refers to the economic sector • Invasion — traditionally, a process through which a new activity or social group enters an area • Succession — a new use or social group gradually replaces the former occupants • The following models were constructed to examine single cities and do not necessarily apply to metropolitan coalescences so common in today’s world

  4. Concentric zone model • Developed in 1925 by Ernest W. Burgess • A model with five zones.

  5. Concentric zone model • A model with five zones. • Zone 1 • The central business district (CBD) • Distinct pattern of income levels out to the commuters’ zone • Extension of trolley lines had a lot to do with this pattern)

  6. Concentric zone model • A model with five zones. • Zone 2 • Characterized by mixed pattern of industrial and residential land use • Rooming houses, small apartments, and tenements attract the lowest income segment • Often includes slums and skid rows, many ethnic ghettos began here • Usually called the transition zone

  7. Concentric zone model • A model with five zones. • Zone 3 • The “workingmen’s quarters” • Solid blue-collar, located close to factories of zones 1 and 2 • More stable than the transition zone around the CBD • Often characterized by ethnic neighborhoods — blocks of immigrants who broke free from the ghettos • Spreading outward because of pressure from transition zone and because blue-collar workers demanded better housing

  8. Concentric zone model • A model with five zones. • Zone 4 • Middle class area of “better housing” • Established city dwellers, many of whom moved outward with the first streetcar network • Commute to work in the CBD

  9. Concentric zone model • A model with five zones. • Zone 5 • Consists of higher-income families clustered together in older suburbs • Located either on the farthest extension of the trolley or commuter railroad lines • Spacious lots and large houses • From here the rich pressed outward to avoid congestion and social heterogeneity caused by expansion of zone 4

  10. Concentric zone model • Theory represented the American city in a new stage of development • Before the 1870s, cities such as New York had mixed neighborhoods where merchants’ stores and sweatshop factories were intermingled with mansions and hovels • Rich and poor, immigrant and native-born, rubbed shoulders in the same neighborhoods

  11. Concentric zone model • In Chicago, Burgess’s home town, the great fire of 1871 leveled the core • The result of rebuilding was a more explicit social patterning • Chicago became a segregated city with a concentric pattern • This was the city Burgess used for his model • The actual map of the residential area does not exactly match his simplified concentric zones

  12. Concentric zone model • Critics of the model • Pointed out even though portions of each zone did exist, rarely were they linked to totally surround the city • Burgess countered there were distinct barriers, such as old industrial centers, preventing the completion of the arc • Others felt Burgess, as a sociologist, overemphasized residential patterns and did not give proper credit to other land uses

  13. Sector model • Homer Hoyt, an economist, presented his sector model in 1939 • Maintained high-rent districts were instrumental in shaping land-use structure of the city • Because these areas were reinforced by transportation routes, the pattern of their development was one of sectors or wedges

  14. Sector model • Hoyt suggested high-rent sector would expand according to four factors • Moves from its point of origin near the CBD, along established routes of travel, toward another nucleus of high-rent buildings • Will progress toward high ground or along waterfronts, when these areas are not used for industry • Will move along the route of fastest transportation • Will move toward open space

  15. Sector model • As high-rent sectors develop, areas between them are filled in • Middle-rent areas move directly next to them, drawing on their prestige • Low-rent areas fill remaining areas • Moving away from major routes of travel, rents go from high to low • There are distinct patterns in today’s cities that echo Hoyt’s model • He had the advantage of writing later than Burgess — in the age of the automobile

  16. Sector model • Today, major transportation arteries are generally freeways • Surrounding areas are often low-rent districts • Contrary to Hoyt’s theory • Freeways were imposed on existing urban pattern • Often built through low-rent areas where land was cheaper and political opposition was less

  17. Multiple nuclei model • Suggested by Chauncey Harris and Edward Ullman in 1945 • Maintained a city developed with equal intensity around various points • The CBD was not the sole generator of change

  18. Multiple nuclei model • Equal weight must be given to: • An old community on city outskirts around which new suburbs clustered • An industrial district that grew from an original waterfront location • Low-income area that began because of some social stigma attached to site

  19. Multiple nuclei model • Rooted their model in four geographic principles • Certain activities require highly specialized facilities • Accessible transportation for a factory • Large areas of open land for a housing tract • Certain activities cluster because they profit from mutual association • Certain activities repel each other and will not be found in the same area • Certain activities could not make a profit if they paid the high rent of the most desirable locations

  20. Multiple nuclei model • More than any other model takes into account the varied factors of decentralization in the structure of the North American city • Many criticize the concentric zone and sector theories as being rather deterministic because they emphasize one single factor • Multiple nuclei theory encompasses a larger spectrum of economic and social possibilities • Most urban scholars feel Harris and Ullman succeeded in trying to integrate the disparate element of culture into workable model

  21. Feminist critiques • Most criticisms of above models focus or their inability to account for all the complexities of urban forms • All three models assume urban patterns are shaped by economic trade-offs between: • Desire to live in suburban neighborhood appropriate to one’s economic status • Need to live close to the city center for employment opportunities

  22. Feminist critiques • Models assume only one person is a wage worker — the male head • Ignore dual-income families and households headed by single women • Women contend with a larger array of factors in making locational decisions • Distances to child care and school facilities • Other important services important for different members of a family • Traditional models that assume a spatial separation of workplace and home are no longer appropriate

  23. Feminist critiques • Results of a study of activity patterns of working parents • Women living in a city have access to wider array of employment opportunities • Better able to combine domestic and wage labor than women in suburbs • Many middle class women choose a gentrified inner-city location to live • Hope this area will offer amenities of suburbs—good schools and safety • Accommodate their activity patterns • Other research has shown some businesses locate offices in suburbs because they rely on labor of highly educated, middle class women spatially constrained by domestic work

  24. Feminist critiques • Most women seek employment closer to home than men even those without small children • Criticism of models by women • Most families require two real wage earners • Models tend to reflect an urban structure that isolates women who do not participate in the urban labor market • Raises problems of timing and organization for those who combine waged and domestic labor • Created by men who shared certain assumptions about how cities operate, and represent a partial view of urban life

  25. Feminist critiques • Other theories incorporated alternative perspective of female scholars • Studies using mostly female students, focused on “race,” ethnicity, class, and housing in Chicago • Emphasized role of landlords in shaping discrimination in the housing market • Study by urban historian Raymond Mohl • Follows the making of black ghettos in Miami between 1940 and 1960 • Reveals role of public policy decisions, landlordism, and discrimination

  26. Apartheid and post-apartheid city • Apartheid —state-sanctioned policies of segregating “races” • Intended effects of these policies on urban form are delineated in next slide

  27. Apartheid and post-apartheid city • Important components of the apartheid state • Policies of economic and political discrimination were formalized under National Party rule after 1948 • Government passed two major pieces of legislation in 1950 • First was the Population Registration Act — mandated classification of population into discrete racial groups: white, black, and colored • Second called the Group Areas Act — goal was to divide cities into sections that could be inhabited only by members of one population group

  28. Apartheid and post-apartheid city • Important components of the apartheid state • Policies of economic and political discrimination were formalized under National Party rule after 1948 • Government passed two major pieces of legislation in 1950 • First was the Population Registration Act — mandated classification of population into discrete racial groups: white, black, and colored • Second called the Group Areas Act — goal was to divide cities into sections that could be inhabited only by members of one population group

  29. Apartheid and post-apartheid city • Important components of the apartheid state • Government passed two major pieces of legislation in 1950 • Effects of the two acts • Downtowns were restricted to whites • Areas for non-whites were peripheral, restricted, and often without urban services—transportation or shopping • Large numbers of non-whites were displaced with little or no compensation • Buffer zones were created between residential to curtail contact

  30. Apartheid and post-apartheid city • Model apartheid city most closely resembles the sector model • Cities were artificially divided into discrete areas • Non-white populations suffered the consequences • Notorious example — Sophiatown in Johannesburg • Remains to be seen what form the post-apartheid will take

  31. The Soviet and post-Soviet city • Cities were shaped by the Bolshevik revolution of 1917 • Socialist principles called for the nationalization of all resources • Economics would no longer dictate land-use—allocation planners would • New ideals had profound effect on urban form of Soviet cities

  32. The Soviet and post-Soviet city • Soviet policies attempted to create a more equitable arrangement of land uses • Relative absence of residential segregation according to socioeconomic status • Equitable housing facilities for most citizens • Relatively equal accessibility to sites for distribution of consumer items • Cultural amenities located and priced to be accessible to as manypeople as possible • Adequate and accessible public transportation

  33. The Soviet and post-Soviet city • The situation outlined above was less than ideal • By the 1970s and 1980s many Soviets realized their standards of living were well below those in the west • Centralized planning system was not successful • In the late 1980s economic restructuring introduced perestroyka • The post-Soviet city • Market forces are again the dominant force in shaping urban land uses • Pace and scale of urban change are unprecedented

  34. The Soviet and post-Soviet city • The privatization of the housing market —example of Moscow • Private housing grew from 9.3 percent in 1990 to 49.6 percent in 1994 • Does not mean better housing for all people • Many people cannot afford the high prices • Apartments are particularly expensive in the center of Moscow • Most people have no choice but to live in communal apartments from the old Soviet system

  35. The Soviet and post-Soviet city • Cities are taking on the look of Western cities • Downtowns now have most expensive land • Increasingly dominated by retailing outlets of familiar Western companies • Tall office buildings housing financial activities are replacing industrial buildings • Processes akin to gentrification are taking place in city centers displacing residents to peripheral portions of the cities • The outcome of the new changes is not certain and will be continued to be studied

  36. Latin American model • More complex because of influence of local cultures on urban development • Difficult to group cities of the developing world into one or two comprehensive models • Latin American model is shown in next slide

  37. Latin American model • Generalized scheme both sensitive to local cultures and articulates pervasive influence of international forces, both Western and non-Western • In contrast to today’s cities in the U.S., the CBDs of Latin American cities are vibrant, dynamic, and increasingly specialized • A reliance on public transit that serves the central city • Existence of a large and relatively affluent population closest to CBD

  38. Latin American model • Outside the CBD, the dominant component is a commercial spine surrounded by • the elite residential sector • These two zones are interrelated and called the spine/sector • Essentially an extension of the CBD down a major boulevard • Here are the city’s important amenities — parks, theaters, restaurants, and even golf courses • Strict zoning and land controls ensure continuation of these activities, protecting elite from incursions by low-income squatters

  39. Latin American model • Inner-city zone of maturity • Less prestigious collection of traditional colonial homes and upgraded self-built homes • Homes occupied by people unable to participate in the spine/sector • Area of upward mobility

  40. Latin American model • Zone of accretion • Diverse collection of housing types, sizes, and quality • Transition between zone of maturity and next zone • Area of ongoing construction and change • Some neighborhoods have city-provided utilities • Other blocks must rely on water and butane delivery trucks for essential services

  41. Latin American model • Zone of peripheral squatter settlements • Where most recent migrants are found • Fringe contrasts with affluent and comfortable suburbs that ring North American cities • Houses often built from scavenged materials • Gives the appearance of a refugee camp

  42. Latin American model • Zone of peripheral squatter settlements • Surrounded by landscape bare of vegetation that was cut for fuel and building materials • Streets unpaved, open trenches carry wastes, residents carry water from long distances, electricity is often “pirated” • Residents who work have a long commute • Many are transformed through time into permanent neighborhoods

More Related