1 / 85

1. PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS Table 1.1: Age Distributions

1. PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS Table 1.1: Age Distributions. percent. 40. 30. %. 20. 10. 0. <1. 15-24. 35-44. 55-64. 75-84. 1-14. 25-34. 45-54. 65-74. >=85. Age group, years. Figure 1.1: Age Distributions. Table 1.2: Gender Distributions.

ormiston
Download Presentation

1. PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS Table 1.1: Age Distributions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1. PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICSTable 1.1: Age Distributions The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  2. percent 40 30 % 20 10 0 <1 15-24 35-44 55-64 75-84 1-14 25-34 45-54 65-74 >=85 Age group, years Figure 1.1: Age Distributions The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  3. Table 1.2: Gender Distributions The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  4. Table 1.3(a) : Number Of Patients With First Eye And Second Eye Surgery The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  5. Table 1.3(b): Period Of Time Before Second Eye Surgery The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  6. Table 1.4: Number Of Patients With Ocular Co-Morbidity The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  7. Table 1.5: Number Of Patients With Systemic Co-Morbidity The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  8. Table 1.6(a): Pre-Operative Visual Acuity Measurement The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  9. Unaided Refracted 20 15 % 10 5 0 6/5 6/9 6/18 6/36 5/60 3/60 1/60 HM NPL 6/6 6/12 6/24 6/60 4/60 2/60 CF PL Visual acuity Figure 1.6: Pre-Operative Visual Acuity Measurement The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  10. Table 1.6(b): Pre-Operative Visual Acuity Measurement By Gender The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  11. Table 1.7: Causes Of Cataract The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  12. 2. CATARACT SURGICAL PRACTICES Table 2.1: Number (%) Of Surgery Done By Month The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  13. Figure 2.1: Number (%) Of Surgery number 2000 1500 1000 No. of surgeries 500 0 January March May July September November February April June August October December Month The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  14. Table 2.2: Number Of Surgery Done By Centre, 2002 And 2003 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  15. Year 2002 Year 2003 1500 1000 No. of surgeries 500 0 A C E G I K M O Q S U W Y AA AC AE AG B D F H J L N P R T V X Z AB AD AF Centre Figure 2.2: Number Of Surgery Done By Center The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  16. Table 2.3: Distribution Of Day Care Setting By Centre, All Surgery And Those Excluded Children Below 18 Years And Combined Surgery The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  17. Average day care (all patients)=37% Day care In-patient 100 % 50 37 0 J C AF U AD D W L B S G Q AB K H I R N AA E V A 0 P AC T M X Y F Z AE Centre Figure 2.3(a): Distribution Of Day Care And In Patient By Centre, Year 2003 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  18. Average day care (all patients)=38% Day care In-patient 100 % 50 38 0 AF R C U E V W L B T G M Y F Z I N J AA AD A D 0 P AC S Q X K AB H AE Centre Figure 2.3(b): Distribution Of Day Care And In Patient By Centre (Exclude Children And Those With Combined Surgery), Year 2003 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  19. Table 2.4: Distribution Of Types Of Cataract Surgery By Centre The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  20. Table 2.5: Distribution Of Combined Surgery By Centre The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  21. Table 2.6: Proportion Of Nature Of Cataract Surgery The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  22. Table 2.7: Type Of Anaesthesia The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  23. Average of local anesthesia =93% Local General 100 93 % 50 0 N T D Y X F V 0 Q W H I J AB A P G U M S AA B C AC K AD L E AF Z R AE Centre Figure 2.7: Type Of Anaesthesia The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  24. Table 2.8: Type Of Local Anaesthesia The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  25. Table 2.9: Distribution Of Single And Multiple Local Anaesthesia The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  26. Table 2.10: Type Of Sedation Given To Patient Who Had Local Anaesthesia The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  27. Table 2.11: Intraocular Lens Implantation 2.11(a) IOL Implantation The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  28. 2.11(b) Distribution Of IOL Placement The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  29. Table 2.12: Distribution Of Cataract Surgery Without IOL The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  30. Table 2.13: Distribution Of IOL- Materials And Types The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  31. 3. CATARACT SURGERY OUTCOMES3.1 Cataract Surgery Complications - Intra-OperativeTable 3.1.1: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Type Of Cataract Surgery * Number In Each Column Might Add Up To Be More Than That Recorded At Row With ‘ Any Intra-Op Complication’ As One Patient Might Have More Than One Type Of Intra-Operative Complications. The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  32. All surgeries 10 % 5 0 Any 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 Intra-operative complication Figure 3.1.1.1 Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complication Intra-Operative Complication: Index Refers To Table 3.1.1 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  33. Figure 3.1.1.2: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complication By Posterior Capsule Rupture With Vitreous Loss And Posterior Capsule Rupture Without Vitreous Loss PCR with vitreous loss PCR without vitreous loss 30 20 % 10 0 LA ECCE PE PE to ECCE ICCE 2 IOL Implant Type of cataract surgery LA=Lens Aspiration 2 IOL Implant=Secondary IOL Implant The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  34. Figure 3.1.1.3: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complication By Zonular Dialysis With Vitreous Loss And Zonular Dialysis Without Vitreous Loss ZD with vitreous loss ZD without vitreous loss 20 15 % 10 5 0 LA ECCE PE PE to ECCE ICCE 2 IOL Implant Type of cataract surgery LA=Lens Aspiration 2 IOL Implant=Secondary IOL Implant The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  35. Table 3.1.2: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Combined Surgery *Number In Each Column Might Add Up To Be More Than That Recorded At Row With ‘ Any Intra-Operative Complication’ As One Patient Might Have More Than One Type Of Intra-Operative Complications The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  36. Table 3.1.3: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Nature Of Cataract Surgery The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  37. Figure 3.1.3: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Nature Of Cataract Surgery Emergency Elective 20 15 % 10 5 0 Any 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 Intra-operative complication Intra-Op Complication: Index Refers To Table 3.1.3 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  38. Table 3.1.4: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Type Of Anaesthesia The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  39. Figure 3.1.4: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Type Of Anaesthesia General Local 10 % 5 0 Any 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 Intra-operative complication Intra-Op Complication: Index Refers To Table 3.1.4 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  40. Table 3.1.5: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Type Of Local Anaesthesia * Number In Each Column Might Add Up To Be More Than That Recorded At Row With ‘ Any Intra-Op Complication’ As One Patient Might Have More Than One Type Of Intra-Operative Complications The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  41. Table 3.1.6: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Single Or Multiple Local Anaesthesia The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  42. Figure 3.1.6: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Single Or Multiple Local Anaesthesia Single anaesthesia Multiple anaesthesia 15 10 % 5 0 Any 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 Intra-operative complication Intra-Op Complication: Index Refers To Table 3.1.6 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  43. Table 3.1.7: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Type Of Sedation * Number In Each Column Might Add Up To Be More Than That Recorded At Row With ‘ Any Intra-Op Complication’ As One Patient Might Have More Than One Type Of Intra-Operative Complications The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  44. No sedation Oral Intravenous Intravenous plus oral Intramuscular 20 15 10 % 5 0 Any 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 Intra-operative complication Figure 3.1.7: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Type Of Sedation Intra-Op Complication: Index Refers To Table 3.1.7 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  45. Table 3.1.8: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Sedation The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  46. No Sedation Single Sedation Multiple Sedation 10 % 5 0 Any 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 Intra-operative complication Figure 3.1.8: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Sedation Intra-Op Complication: Index Refers To Table 3.1.8 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  47. Table 3.1.9: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Cataract Surgery With IOL The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  48. Posterior Anterior Scleral 80 60 % 40 20 0 Any 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 Intra-operative complication Figure 3.1.9: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Cataract Surgery With IOL Intra-Op Complication: Index Refers To Table 3.1.09 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  49. Table 3.1.10: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Cataract Surgery Without IOL The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

  50. IOL Planned No IOL was planned 80 60 % 40 20 0 Any 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 Intra-operative complication Figure 3.1.10: Distribution Of Intra-Operative Complications By Cataract Surgery Without IOL Intra-Op Complication: Index Refers To Table 3.1.10 The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry 2003

More Related