1 / 9

Report: Partnership & Selection Group

Report: Partnership & Selection Group. Working Together to Prepare Illinois School Leaders August 6, 2008 Small-group discussion. Participants. St. Xavier: Sheila Wright & Beverly Gulley Dominican: Jim Harrington Benedictine: Laine Tadlock Western Illinois: Bonnie Smith-Scripps

ornice
Download Presentation

Report: Partnership & Selection Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Report: Partnership & Selection Group Working Together to Prepare Illinois School Leaders August 6, 2008 Small-group discussion

  2. Participants • St. Xavier: Sheila Wright & Beverly Gulley • Dominican: Jim Harrington • Benedictine: LaineTadlock • Western Illinois: Bonnie Smith-Scripps • Eastern Illinois: John Dively • Bradley: Jenny Tripses • IERC: Kathleen Brown

  3. Brainstorming Activity • Five years out, what would your program look like? • Ideal: PDS where everyone focuses on students • New kinds of collaborations using technology • P20 Collaborations that effectively manages mandates that serve students • More cohorts • Program integrity: regardless of size. • Mission-driven

  4. Positive Changes from Recommendations • Partnerships with districts for strategic recruitment • We need to communicate standards for admissions. • Articulate the P20 connections. • Increased sense of professionalism in our field. • Outcome of collaboration is to create greater clarity and integrity in our roles.

  5. Challenges & Barriers • Time & Resources to promote collaboration • Institutional and Professional Commitment • Costs of partnerships for higher education • Tenure process does not support now. • The current certification test does not inform programs for improvement.

  6. Partnerships • What’s out there? What is effective? • Examples: partnering for search committees, joint faculty appointments, etc. • Mentoring relationships • Co-teaching • Advisory Boards (basic) • ROE’s have resources & they collaborate on professional development.

  7. Candidate Selection Process • Tensions and ethical issues in either allowing districts to select candidates or allowing University to select candidates who do not get positions. • Reproduction of the status quo. • Joint process or agreed-upon criteria • Best selection = motivation on part of student (market-based)

  8. Supports Needed for Success • Models of successful collaborations • Time to devote to this work • Leverage to change university culture • Leverage to change P12 culture

  9. Takeaway • Have we correctly identified and defined the “problem”? • This will dictate the solutions we develop! • Baseline data needed • Methodological limitations of “snapshot” standardized tests as measure of outcomes

More Related