140 likes | 289 Views
Optimising Capacity and Competence ISMOR August 2002. Dr Craig Smith, Head of Capability Analysis, MBDA (UK). Scope. Competence and Technical Risk Capacity and Operational Risk Capability - System of Systems Developing the requirements and the solution Smart Acquisition opportunities
E N D
Optimising Capacity and CompetenceISMOR August 2002 Dr Craig Smith, Head of Capability Analysis, MBDA (UK)
Scope • Competence and Technical Risk • Capacity and Operational Risk • Capability - System of Systems • Developing the requirements and the solution • Smart Acquisition opportunities • Summary
Capability Options Competence (1) • The ability to meet a technical requirement • Thresholds • Black or white, or shades of gracefully degrading grey
Surveillance Engagement Command Option 1 Option 2 Flexibility Mobility Survivability Support Competence (2) • Trade-offs between different levels of competence • Technical risk is associated with the level of competence • focus for risk reduction/ technology demonstrators
Capacity • The quantity of equipment/ men/ systems • The force mix between components of the total system • “Soft” • measured in scenarios • thresholds are assumption dependent • how much operational risk can be tolerated? • Where is the risk reduction for operational risk • exercises? • testing of tactics/ CONOPS?
DOCTRINE Capability B Capability C CONOPS Organisation C4I STAR Architecture Fuzzy Boundaries Portfolio of complementary systems Support & training concept Support philosophy The Total System of Systems • Optimise total capability not individual systems
Potential elements of EIAD Key questions • How many systems? • Overlap • Synergy • Complementarity • Co-ordination • Architecture MSAM GB Sensors BMD VSHORAD BMC4I AirborneSensors SHORAD FighterAircraft
URD BoI CapacityHow much of it CompetenceHow well do we do the task Range - depends on density 1000 or 2000 missiles Bad weather performance Architecture Platform numbers Requires iteration to get the trade-off right Competence & Capacity Capability • Need to work competence and capacity together as part of the same study
Decision Systems Engineering Process Identify & Challenge Boundaries Ensure these are Underlying Needs Explore the Problem Capture Requirements Propose Total System Options Analyse Innovate - Cost Reduction - Synergy - Modularity Broad Consideration of Measures of Comparison
Developing the requirements and the solution • Complex problems require iteration • too difficult to get requirements right first time • impact can only be determined by a view of solutions • interdependence of competence and capability • need to perform trade-off studies • Allow for evolution / incremental acquisition • in the threat, and in the responding systems • balance goals with affordable steps
Smart Acquisition Opportunities • Partnership between MoD and Industry • Allows each analysis community to share their insights • industry to provide insight how requirements affect cost and technical risk • Dstl to provide insight into campaign issues and operational risk • Expose the high level trade-offs in capability, cost and risk
Summary • Competence and capacity together drive many key system requirements • Applying systems engineering to the whole problem can provide the optimised solution • Optimisation of the capability must address both capacity and competence within the same study • Do it SMART - analysts of the UK unite!