1 / 38

McAllen ISD 5-Year Strategic Plan 2011 – 2015 February 8, 2010

McAllen ISD 5-Year Strategic Plan 2011 – 2015 February 8, 2010. Instructional Services Business Operations District Operations. Mission Critical. Objective I- rigorous and relevant instructional program Objective II- resources to protect the instructional core

orsen
Download Presentation

McAllen ISD 5-Year Strategic Plan 2011 – 2015 February 8, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. McAllen ISD 5-Year Strategic Plan 2011 – 2015February 8, 2010 • Instructional Services • Business Operations • District Operations

  2. Mission Critical Objective I- rigorous and relevant instructional program Objective II- resources to protect the instructional core Objective III- support systems to ensure students, teacher, and principal achievements Objective IV- services and products to meet campus needs Objective V- board of trustees /superintendent maintain focus on student achievement

  3. ACADEMIC AND OTHER RECENT GAINS • District awarded College Ready Graduates Gold Performance Acknowledgement from the State • Implementation of Value Added data analysis raises the standard, while pushing for academic rigor and differentiated instruction • Academic Excellence Indicator System reports the District’s passing percentages exceeded both regional and state levels • School recognized by Texas Business Education Coalition for gains in student achievement for three consecutive years, and • Student daily attendance at 96%, compared to 94.4% last year

  4. ACADEMIC AND OTHER RECENT GAINS • District and campuses garnered 123 Commended Performance and other positive indicators from the state in reading, writing, math, science, social studies, AP/IB examination results, and other areas • Seven schools named in 2009 Just for the Kids Campaign for Higher Performing Schools in Texas by National Center for Educational Achievement, with recognition based on growth in math, reading, and/or science

  5. Instructional ServicesStrategic Plan Instructional Services

  6. Current Status • Student Achievement • College and Career Readiness • Value Added • Absolute Growth • Student Populations • Dropout • Completion Rate • Over-aged • Quality of Instruction • International Baccalaureate • College Ready Graduates • Instructional Leadership • Instructional Technology

  7. Current Status AbsoluteCampus AEIS Ratings 2009 District Accountability Summary Texas Education Agency

  8. Current StatusCollege-Ready Graduates* *Graduates who met or exceeded college-ready criteria on TAKS exit-level, SAT or ACT 2008-2009 AEIS Texas Education Agency

  9. The INOVA Process • INOVA Student Profiles use colors to represent data. • A student receives a color code by subject. • The colors represent a prediction of how the student will perform on the next test in a particular subject without any intervention. • For McAllen ISD, “Green” indicates a 97% (conversion rate) probability of passing the next test; “Blue” indicates an 82% probability of passing the next test; “Gray” indicates a 71% probability; “Yellow” is 55% and “Red” represents a 26% probability of passing. • For example, based on the INOVA formula, if a campus has 100 students that are identified as “Blue”, 81 students (81%) should pass TAKS without intervention. • Our goal is to: • Increase the conversion rates • Increase the number of students who fall in the green, blue and gray color codes

  10. Current StatusAt-Risk Student Populations 2008-2009 AEIS Texas Education Agency

  11. Current StatusInstructional Technology

  12. Moving ForwardQuality of Instruction • Focusing on the Instructional Core • Tiered Staff Development • Delivery of Instruction • Lesson Design • Quality of Instruction • Program Enhancement • International Baccalaureate Program • Expand the Primary Years Program • Add 14 Elementary Campuses over 4-year period • Expand the Middle Years Program • Add 4 Middle School Campuses over 4-year period

  13. Moving ForwardQuality of Instruction • College and Career Readiness • Expand dual enrollment opportunities over a 5-year period • Launch Medical, Engineering and Technology Academy (MET) at Achieve Early College High School • Continue to offer Dual Enrollment Engineering Academy and Dual Enrollment Medical Academy in collaboration with South Texas College • Dual Enrollment with UT Pan American • Virtual on-line courses

  14. Moving ForwardQuality of Instruction • Program Review • Bilingual Program • Identify District Standard • Develop District Model • Newcomer Academy at Middle School • Special Education Program • Identify District Standard • Develop District Model

  15. Moving ForwardQuality of Instruction • Equity Formula • Approved board staffing formula for all campuses • Supplemental Services • Meeting the needs of the at-risk child • Enrichment courses • Credit recovery • Academic Coaching Model • Instructional Coaching Model at secondary level • Middle School • High School

  16. Moving ForwardQuality of Instruction • Commence Audits Spring 2010 • Curriculum • Technology • Staffing

  17. Moving ForwardQuality of Instruction • Instructional Leadership • Building Capacity • Instructional Leadership Seminars • Building the Instructional Leader thru Professional Development • Instructional Leadership Institute • Aspiring Principals • New Administrators Academy • 1st- 3rd year campus principal • Campus Instructional Leadership Team • Teacher Leaders

  18. Evidence of ProgressQuality of Instruction *Or its equivalent new academic rating

  19. Evidence of ProgressQuality of Instruction

  20. Evidence of ProgressQuality of Instruction

  21. Business OperationsStrategic Plan Purchasing Business Services Human Resources Information Technology

  22. Current Status • The District’s ability to raise revenue without a tax ratification election was removed by legislative action in 2005 • For three of the past five years, the District has used its fund balance for operations • Neither the 2007 nor the 2009 Legislative sessions provided significant revenues without mandates • The District has implemented cost saving measures for 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 • More effective and efficiency planning is needed to maintain financial health

  23. Current StatusBusiness Operations • 5-Year History of Financial Numbers • Revenues • Enrollment • Local Tax Collections • Migrant Status • Expenditures • Function 11 • Payroll • Fund Balance

  24. Current StatusTrends

  25. Moving Forward Business Operations • Competitive Salaries • Campus and Department Staffing Plans • Maintenance and Replacement Schedules • Technology Infrastructure/Software Programs • Maximize E-rate Match • Buses/Vehicles • Facilities – Roofs and HVACs • Eliminate Need to Finance Operational Purchases • Continually Monitor Student Average Daily Attendance • As required by HB 3, 81st Regular Legislative Session, TEA is developing a review process to anticipate future financial solvency of school districts • Tax Ratification Election

  26. Moving Forward Business Operations • Position Control • All Vacancies Reviewed • Appropriate Funding is Verified • 2010-2011 Department Staffing • 2009-2010 Campus Staffing Formulas • Elementary • Middle School • High School • 2010-2011 Campus Staffing Formulas • Elementary • Middle School • High School

  27. Current Status 2009-2010 Payroll % of District Budget

  28. Moving Forward 2010-2011 Payroll % of District Budget

  29. Moving Forward Business Operations • 5-year Financial Strategic Plan • Despite a troubled economy, the State must find funding to replace the $3.2 billion void left by the expiring State Fiscal Stabilization Fund • Estimate of State’s shortfall for 2011 biennium is $10.7 billion

  30. PROJECTION Moving ForwardEvidence of Progress

  31. PROJECTION Moving Forward TRE

  32. District OperationsStrategic Plan Facilities Maintenance & Operations Student Support Services Transportation

  33. Current Status District Operations Facilities • District Growth & Facilities Forecast Advisory Committee (January, 2009) • Comprehensive Assessment of All District Facilities • Categorized by Seven Areas and Qualified Needs • Health/Safety, Security, Capacity, Legal, Technology, Replacement, Master Planning • Absolute Needs Exceed $135,000,000 • Big Ticket Items by Need and Cost • Roofs • HVAC • Science Labs

  34. Current Status District Operations Student Support Services • Stable/Flat Enrollment • Four Consecutive School Years with Minimal Student Growth • Enrollment vs. Average Daily Attendance (ADA) • The Attendance Gap • Aging Fleet of School Buses • 44% Over 10 Years Old or Over 200,000 Miles

  35. Moving Forward District Operations Facilities • Absolute Needs = $135,224,000 • Prioritize and Address $1.5 Million/Year Over the Next 5 Years • Target: • Roofs • HVAC • Science Labs

  36. Moving Forward District Operations Student Support Services • Stable/Flat Enrollment • Increase Enrollment By 1% • Implement An Open Enrollment Program • Include Prerequisites • Enrollment vs. Average Daily Attendance (ADA) • Close the Attendance Gap By .5% in 2010-2011 ($650,000/Year) and Maintain 97% Thereafter • Aging Fleet of School Buses • Replace Bus Fleet at a Rate of 5 Buses/Year for 2010 and 10 Buses/Year Over the Next 4 Years

  37. Evidence of ProgressFacilities

  38. Evidence of ProgressStudent Support Services

More Related