1 / 33

Practice Innovations: Group Visits for the Diabetic Patient Nuts & Bolts of a Patient Centered Medical Home June 25

Practice Innovations: Group Visits for the Diabetic Patient Nuts & Bolts of a Patient Centered Medical Home June 25, 2010. Janet Albers, MD Cynthia Ledbetter, APN, CDE. Objectives. Discuss the impact of diabetes and its comorbidities on cardiovascular risk

oshin
Download Presentation

Practice Innovations: Group Visits for the Diabetic Patient Nuts & Bolts of a Patient Centered Medical Home June 25

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Practice Innovations: Group Visitsfor the Diabetic PatientNuts & Bolts of aPatient Centered Medical HomeJune 25, 2010 Janet Albers, MD Cynthia Ledbetter, APN, CDE

  2. Objectives • Discuss the impact of diabetes and its comorbidities on cardiovascular risk • Apply the chronic disease model to the management of type 2 diabetes • Describe the basic components of a diabetes management program • Develop a group-visit intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes • Understand how to code for group visits for type 2 diabetes management • Describe how group visits can support quality improvement initiatives in primary care

  3. Type 2 Diabetes:Epidemiology and Impact Affects 23.8 million U.S. children and adults (7.8 million are undiagnosed) 1 in 3 Americans born in 2000 will develop type 2 diabetes in their lifetimes Fifth leading cause of death in US Economic cost (2002): $132 billion Accounts for 10% of health care dollars spent in the U.S. Source: American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Statistics. http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics.jsp.

  4. Complications of Type 2 Diabetes • Heart • Coronary artery disease • Cardiovascular disease • Blood Vessels • Peripheral artery disease • Intermittent claudication Hyperglycemia • Kidneys • Microalbuminuria • Nephropathy • Nerves • Neuropathy • Gastroparesis • Eyes • Retinopathy • Glaucoma Source: American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2006;29(Suppl 1):S4-S42.

  5. Glycemic Control Reduces Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Complications Risk reduction with 1% decline in updated A1c P=0.021 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P=0.035 Micro-vascular disease Stroke PVD MI Heart failure Cataract excision Source: Stratton IM, et.al (UKPDS). BMJ 2000;321:405-412.

  6. Enhancing Diabetes Management in the Group Visit • Patient centered medical home • Chronic disease model • Group visit (planned visit) • Stages of change • Self management • Goal setting

  7. Patient Centered Medical Home • Personal primary health care • Patient physician relationship • Improved health access across a continuum of referrals and services • Improved care outcomes • Improved satisfaction • Improved quality • Improved safety

  8. Chronic Disease Care Model Health System Community Health Care Organization Resources and Policies ClinicalInformationSystems Self-Management Support DeliverySystem Design Decision Support Prepared Proactive Practice Team Informed Activated Patient Productive Interactions Improved Outcomes

  9. Chronic Disease • The Chronic Care Model (CCM) was developed to improve chronic disease care, but it may also inform delivery of other types of preventive care • Chronic disease care shows positive impact on patient health and self-management by physicians, patients and care managers -attributed to the a strong "partnership"

  10. Group Visits • Group visits are a promising approach to chronic care management for the motivated patient • Group sessions provide opportunities for efficient patient education, socialization and empowerment J AM Board fam Med, 2006; Jaber; qualitative review of group viists

  11. Outcomes Correlated with Group Visits • Enhanced dietary compliance • Improved intermediate markers for diabetes and coronary heart disease (cholesterol and AIC) • Reduced health care expenses • Increased patient and provider satisfaction with care

  12. Group visits: Promoting adherence to Diabetes Guidelines • To evaluate the effect of group visits on clinical outcomes, concordance with 10 American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines • A 12-month randomized controlled trial • 186 diabetic patients comparing care in group visits with traditional patient-physician dyad. • clinical outcomes (HbAlc, blood pressure [BP], lipid profiles) were assessed at 6 and 12 months • quality of care measures (adherence to 10 ADA guidelines and 3 USPSTF cancer screens) at 12 months • Results: HbA1c, BP, and lipid levels did not differ for patients attending group visits verses usual care • Patients receiving care in group visits exhibited greater concordance with ADA process-of-care indicators, breast and cervical screening.

  13. Shared Medical Appointment (SMA) • SMA in which groups of patients (8-20) are seen by a multi-disciplinary team in a 1-2 h appointment • To improve intermediate outcome measures for diabetes (A1c, SBP, LDL-cholesterol) focusing on those patients at highest cardiovascular risk • Quasi-experimental • Each group had up to 8 patients • Patients participated in 1-7 visits • AIC>9%, SBP>160 mmHg, LDL-c>130mg/dl • Results: reductions in A1c in %, SBP, and LDL-c were greater in the intervention group relative to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant

  14. Effects of incorporating group visits on the metabolic control of type 2 Diabetic patients • 1200 patients • ½ monthly medical consult with 1 hr group visits • ½ patients and routine visits (monthly one-to-one medical consultation) • The evolution on FPG, cholesterol, SBP, DBP and BMI were compared • Results: at 15 month follow up. Lower FPG & SBP and DBP were lower in group visit participants. NO differences for cholesterol or BMI.

  15. Improving the Health of Diabetic Patients through Resident-initiated Group Visits • Six group visits were conducted in the evening. • Patients could attend as many visits as they desired • 2 hours and included a 30-minute presentation on a diabetes topic followed by Q&A • This was followed by individual physician visits • HbA1c & LDL at baseline and every 3 months and 1 year • Self-administered surveys were collected from patients at the end of 1 year • 72% of the patients reported making a lifestyle change as a result of attending visits • 40% stated that the visit provided a support group • No statistically significant changes in HbA1c or LDL levels.

  16. Pharmacist Led Group Visit • Randomized controlled trial • 4 weekly sessions 40- to 60-minute educational component followed by pharmacist-led behavioral and pharmacological interventions • Of 118 participants to attain target goals in HTN, BS, lipids, and smoking compared to usual care recommended by ADA • 109 completed the study • A greater proportion of participants versus controls achieved an A1C of less than 7% and a systolic blood pressure less than 130 • No significant change was found in lipid control or tobacco use between the 2 study arms

  17. Reducing Emergency visits in older adults with chronic illness • ER use may be an important sentinel event signifying a breakdown in care coordination • A randomized controlled trial of group visits (2-year) • 295 older adults (> or = 60 years of age) with frequent utilization of outpatient services and one or more chronic illnesses. • Monthly group visits (8 to 12) with a physician, nurse, and pharmacist held in 19 physician practices • Visits emphasized self-management of chronic illness, peer support, and regular contact with the primary care team • Conclusion: Monthly group visits reduce emergency department utilization for chronically ill older adults

  18. Group visits effective for elderly w/ chronic illness • HMO members over age 65 within provider panels to a group visit intervention (n=160) or usual care (n=161). • Functional status, utilization of inpatient and outpatient services, and patient and provider satisfaction with care –followed for 1 year • 8 patients in each two-hour group session, (time for socialization, multidisciplinary education on self care, health maintenance and 1-1 visits with their physician) • Group participants had significantly fewer emergency room visits, subspecialist visits, calls to physicians, repeat hospital admissions, higher immunization percentages, and higher satisfaction with care compared to usual care group. • Group participants had more calls and visits to nurses, No change in health of functional status • Physicians reported higher satisfaction with group care

  19. Group Visit Process • Comfort and training of providers • Multidisciplinary team • Customization in each unique practice • Space • Recruiting patients • Confidentiality • Billing

  20. Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) • Diabetes disease process and treatment options • Nutrition management and physical activity into lifestyle • Use medication safely and therapeutic effectiveness • Monitoring blood glucose, interpretation, and self management decision making • Acute and Chronic complications and problem solving • Psychosocial issues and healthy coping

  21. Stages of Change Pre-contemplation (no) Contemplation (on the fence) Preparation/determination (small changes) Action (go!!) Maintenance (cruising) Relapse (learning opportunity, not failure)

  22. The Diabetes Management Team Endocrinologist Mental health professional Neurologist Patient Primary Provider Family/Caregiver Diabetes educator Dietitian Care Coordinator Qualified eyecare provider Nephrologist Cardiologist/ Vascular or General Surgeon Pharmacist Podiatrist/ Wound care

  23. Self Management • Six principles of diabetes self management: • Knowledge, agreed upon treatment plan, shared decision making process, monitoring and management, recognition of physical, emotional, social impact, lifestyle to promote health • Steps to support self management: • Patient perspective, overcoming barriers, link resources, planned and/or group visits. • Self care review

  24. Goal Setting • Collaborate to set goal • Action plan • Measurable • Assess barriers • Assess confidence • Referral for skills • Follow-up plan (time/place)

  25. Group Visit • Monthly (group of poorly controlled) • Quarterly (3, 6, 12 months) • Yearly • One time or series sessions (opportunity to return) • Pre-diabetes, new diabetes, uncontrolled diabetes, high risk • Gestational and type 1 diabetes • Referred from primary provider or run by primary provider or team

  26. Components of a Group Visitcustomize to your practice • Pre work including documentation template • Scheduling and space • Individual visit (if necessary) • Group confidentiality • Intake and introduction • Interactive learning experience • Break and healthy snack • Action planning and self-management • Summary and future planning

  27. Group Visit nuts and bolts • Prior to visit: • Education in practice/determine need • Selecting appropriate participants • *Define roles of team members (staff) • Number of patients to be scheduled and how often • Room, time, topics or flow (facility and documentation) • In-house referral to group/schedule/invitation • Review individual diabetic care indicators *scheduler, reception, nursing, group facilitator/team

  28. Group visitNuts and bolts • Individual care: • Nursing-BP, BS, weight, foot exam, update meds, immunizations, protocols (titrations, smoking) • Provider with patient –diabetes care indicator, review lab and medication, depression screen, blood sugar log, smoking/alcohol, supplies, *immunizations, *foot check • Brief consultation and recommendations for changes in therapy • Refills, referrals (retinal, foot, dental), and follow up • Acute concerns 10 min each *provider will cover if abnormal or orders needed

  29. Group visitNuts and bolts • Group (interactive learning): • Confidentiality • Introductions • Information sharing: What is diabetes • Targets for control, complications, high/low sugars, home glucose monitoring • Self management support-nutrition, exercise, smoking cessation, foot care, stress, weight reduction, taking medicine, monitoring blood sugars • Questions and answers • Self management goal setting (action plan, confidence, individual or group) • Invite quarterly/Follow up with primary provider • Complete any one on one • Documentation 4-6 pts, 1-1 1/2 hour, NP CDE lead

  30. Planned Visit • Review of meds-intensity of care • Meds (comply, access, additions/subtractions) • Glycemic/BP/ lipid control (labs, a1c, microalbumin, lipids, creatinine) • Exam (limited physical/foot) • Needed Metrics (depression, retinal, dental podiatry • Self care review • smoking, exercise, diet, monitoring • Self management goal setting • collaborate to set goal • Action plan • Measureable, assess barriers, confidence, referral for skills or community resources • Follow up plan annually scheduled diabetes care visit-25 min-hour.

  31. Reimbursing Group Visits • Evaluation and Management methods in standard one on one office visits • Documentation is critical • Use a template • Individual portion: labs, meds, history, vitals, general assessment, educational discussion, assessment and plan, foot exam, time spent (99213 or 99214 with ICD- 9 diabetes diagnosis code 250.xx) • Medicare reimburses the group education component of a group visit only when it is provided by CDE. • Time 25min 1-1 99214/ >40 min 99215

  32. Conclusion on group visits • Early diagnosis and aggressive management • Treat to target strategies • Group visits for chronic illness within the health care delivery system can improve quality • Technology support and creative work force design • Identify and track patients and incorporate evidence based care • Proactive team and motivated patient • Future research structure, process of care, content of visits, outcome measures

  33. References • DiabetesStatistics.http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics.jsp. • American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2006;29(Suppl 1):S4-S42. • Stratton IM, et.al (UKPDS). BMJ 2000;321:405-412. • J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):370-4 • J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):295-305 • J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):276-90. • J GENERAL IM 22: 5: 620-624;MAY 2007 • Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct;16(5):349-53 • REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE:13710)1323-1332;OCT 2009 • FAMILY MEDICINE: 41(2): 116-119: FEB 2009  • DIABETES EDUCATOR:36 (1)109-117:JAN-FEB 2010  • Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Mar-Apr;4(2):80-1 • The Cooperative Health Care Clinic. J Am Geri Soc 1997; 45:543-549.

More Related