1 / 17

Pupil voice: comfortable and uncomfortable for teachers

Pupil voice: comfortable and uncomfortable for teachers. Key issue addressed by the study. This study explored: pupils’ views about three lessons teacher s’ reactions to their pupils’ comments how the teachers used the pupils’ ideas with their classes.

oshin
Download Presentation

Pupil voice: comfortable and uncomfortable for teachers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pupil voice: comfortable and uncomfortable for teachers

  2. Key issue addressed by the study This study explored: pupils’ views about three lessons teachers’ reactions to their pupils’ comments how the teachers used the pupils’ ideas with their classes

  3. Ideas pupils gave for improving lessons • Pupils suggested: • interactive teaching –‘If he asked more questions then we’d become more alert’ • linking new learning to something familiar • being given greater independence - ‘We enjoyed writing stuff that we found out ourselves …’ • collaborative learning to help them express themselves and develop understandings

  4. Criteria teachers applied to the pupils’ ideas before using them Teachers needed the pupils’ suggestions to be: practical popular with the class likely to be effective educationally desirable

  5. The suggestions teachers found acceptable • Helpful suggestions were those that: • asked their teachers to extend existing or previous practices (e.g. investigational work) • encouraged teachers to persist with innovative ideas • were sensible, practical and purposeful (e.g. discussing wrong results more)

  6. What happened when the teachers tried out their pupils’ ideas • Three different experiences: • two teachersgrew increasingly enthusiastic • two experienced success in the short-term • two teachers’ experiences were unsuccessful

  7. Experiencing short-term success Two teachers: decided to include e.g. more collaborative and practical work successfully incorporated the ideas into their teaching six months later their teaching was no different to before felt constraints of normal school routines had made some ideas unrealistic

  8. Growing enthusiasm for pupil voice Two teachers: initially had difficulty incorporating pupils’ suggestions persisted felt the changes they had made had improved pupil motivation and independence continued to consult pupils

  9. Encountering problems with using pupil voice Sometimes the teachers: overestimated their pupils’ capabilities –e.g. their group working skills were disappointed with the results – e.g. having more discussion created more noise

  10. Comfortable learnings There was no need for the teachers to feel concerned about pupils commenting on their teaching because pupils: made constructive suggestions knew what helped them to learn often asked teachers to extend existing or past practices

  11. Challenges of pupil voice The researchers noted how: the pupils teachers most need to hear from are the most difficult to consult genuinely responding to pupil voice involves a change in the balance of classroom power concerns about complying with statutory requirements led some to view pupil voice less seriously e.g. relegating pupils’ ideas to the end of term rather than building them into lessons

  12. Who were the children in the study? • Year 8 pupils from three secondary schools • Two English, two mathematics and two science classes

  13. How was the information gathered? Six pupils broadly representative of each class interviewed individually about three lessons Transcripts of the interviews fed back to teachers who were interviewed a few days later about their reactions to the pupils’ ideas Researchers investigated teachers’ use of their pupils’ ideas Each teacher was visited again the following academic year to see whether the teachers were still using pupil voice, and if so, how

  14. How can teachers use the evidence in this study? • The teachers tended to act on practical suggestions which the pupils agreed with • Would having a whole class discussion help your pupils to make practical and popular suggestions? • Pupils wanted to be trusted to learn and to collaborate with their peers more • Would your pupils welcome more opportunities for collaboration and greater autonomy in their learning?

  15. How can school leaders use the evidence in this study? • Some teachers in the study had more success articulately when they persisted than others when responding to pupil voice • Would collaborating with colleagues help teachers to evaluate and explore together their pupils’ suggestions and how they might respond to them? • Would taking an interest in how pupils’ suggestions work out help colleagues to persist?

  16. Follow-up reading • Study reference: Pupil voice: comfortable and uncomfortable learnings for teachers McIntyre, D., Pedder, D., & Rudduck, J. (2005) Research Papers in Education, 20 (2) pp. 149-168 • Summary available at: www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/research/themes/pupil_voice/comfortable/

  17. Feedback • Did you find this useful? • What did you like? • What didn’t you like? Any feedback on this Research Bite would be much appreciated. Please email your feedback to: research.summaries@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk

More Related