Download
1 / 20
210 likes | 472 Views
ANOVA. Independent ANOVA. Scores vary – why? Total variability can be divided up into 2 parts 1) Between treatments 2) Within treatments. Between design. Total variability. Within treatments Individual differences Experimental error. Between treatments Treatment effect
E N D
Independent ANOVA • Scores vary – why? • Total variability can be divided up into 2 parts • 1) Between treatments • 2) Within treatments
Between design Total variability Within treatments Individual differences Experimental error Between treatments Treatment effect Individual differences Experimental error
F = variance between treatments variance within F = treatment + indiv diffs + error indiv diffs + error
INDEPENDENT ANOVA assumptions • the observations within each sample must be independent • 2) the populations from which the samples were selected must be normal • 3) the populations from which the samples are selected must have equal variances (homogeneity of variance) • Same assumptions for t test
F measures variance which is standard deviation squared • F = (differences between sample)2 (differences expected by chance)2 F = t2
Information about the purpose of the experiment. • The number of participants. • Descriptive Statistics (effect size –more later) • Analysis result • Post hoc differences
The difference in calories between beef, (n=20), meat (n=17) and poultry (n=17) hotdogs was tested. Mean calorie level was determined for each hotdog type, beef 156.85 (22.64), meat 158.71 (25.24) and poultry 118.76 (22.55). Confidence intervals for the means in each group are shown in figure 1.The calorie level varied between the hotdog types F(2,51) = 16.07, p<.05. MS = 8846. Post hoc test show poultry had fewer calories than both meat (LSD =-38 p<.05) and beef (LSD= -39.9 p<.05).
APA To examine the effects of memory training on retention of words, 20 college students were randomly assigned to four training conditions (n=5) defined by the instructions to participants: story method, imagery method thyme method, and control (no specific instructions). Mean recall out of a possible 20 words (and the sample standard deviation) were for each of the conditions: story 13.2(1.3), imagery 14.4 (1.8), rhyme 13.4 (1.3) and control 10.0 (1.6). Confidence intervals for the means in each group are shown in figure 1. Mean recall differed significantly among the four instruction conditions, F(3,16) = 7.8, p<.05. MS = … Post hoc test show….
Total variability Between treatment variability Treatment effect Experimental error Within treatment variability Individual differences Experimental error Error variability Experimental error Between subject variability Individual differences
F= treatment effect + experimental error experimental error
