The Decline of the UUP: an electoral analysis

1. The Decline of the UUP?: an electoral analysis

7. Attitudes to Integration

8. The Importance of Ideology over Class

10. Moderate Republicans

11. Anti-UK Govt/Anti-Labour

12. Anti-Establishment

13. Respectful Young Integrationists

14. Influential Male Cynics

15. Dissatisfied Social Services

16. 2001 Election Study Findings (Protestants) Self-Identified Protestants participate at same level as Catholics Age by far the strongest predictor of UUP vote, esp. 18-24 vs. 55-65 cohorts Education level more important than income or class for a pro-UUP vote Anti-Establishment feeling very important for anti-UUP vote

17. Survey Summary Factors associated with a deferential, traditional political culture play a central role in UUP support De-traditionalisation and cohort replacement will make UUP resurgence more difficult Liberal ('civic unionist') support is important, but this cannot compensate for loss of traditional UUP base

18. Age and the Ulster Unionist Council: the Orange Order Leadership vs. UUC Orange members 48% of Orange officebearers are under 40 while just a quarter of Orange UUC members are under 45 29% of Orange officebearers over 50, while 66% of UUC Orange members were over 55 UUC is far more elite in terms of social status (wealth, education) than the Order or the Unionist Community

19. UUP share of Protestant vote at District Council level

22. Church of Ireland % of Protestants, 1991 (by DC)

23. Orange Order Lodges & Density 1991

24. Orange Order Density 1991

28. Determinants of UUP Constituencies, 1993-2001 (by z score)

29. Predictors of UUP vote, 1993-2001 (with Orange density), N = 165

30. The Role of Context Areas of High Protestant Unemployment are likely to be young and anti-Elite in attitude Church of Ireland and Orange counties and councils may be more deferential for historical reasons (these forces may once have shaped local political cultures) Less clear that they do so today.

31. Conclusion Importance of 'traditional' vs 'modern' divide (i.e. Older Generation, Church of Ireland, Respect for Institutions and leaders) 'Civic Unionist' segment exists in metropolitan Belfast but does not counterbalance de-traditionalisation in UUP/DUP voting calculus

35. END http://www.kpdata.com/epk/index.html (Follow link 1)

38. Findings: Individual Orange and MLA status are the most important individual characteristics Rural, Gender, Title, Education and Status unimportant Age may be important

39. Findings: Contextual Contextual factors explain most of the variance (party section, geography of residence) Sectional splits and Geographic splits within the Orange Order are critical Big difference between UUC delegates who happen to be Orange and those who represent the Orange

40. Conclusion Implications of breaking UUC-Orange link 'Orange skeptics' vs. 'rational civics' idea needs to be contextualised to official Orangeism - esp. in Belfast & Antrim Importance of 'traditional' vs 'modern' divide (i.e. West Bann Orangemen, respectable working-class constituencies)

41. Differences in Stance within the Orange UUC

42. Orange Traditionalists or Orange Skeptics?: the complex social base of Pro-Agreement Unionism

43. Main Research Questions What is the social profile of the UUC and how does this differ from that of the Orange Order and the Unionist community as a whole Which factors best predict support for the Good Friday Agreement within the UUC? What are the characteristics of pro-UUP constituencies, 1993-2001[time permitting]

44. UUC Social Profile: Previous Survey Research Late 2000 Survey of UUC (Tonge & Evans 2001; 2002). 1/3 response rate Social Profile in terms of age, education, gender, income, occupation, county of residence Showed that roughly half the UUC were Orange members

45. Research Strategy We add contextual factors to the analysis Party List (gender, title, postcode, section) Strategists assign vote (pro/anti-GFA) MOSAIC classifications assigned to party members NI MOSAIC score 1-27 (status), 30-36 (rural) MOSAIC group and score used in multi-level and fixed-effects logistic regressions

47. Occupation: Orange Order versus Orange UUC Delegates

48. Age: Orange Order Leadership vs. the Orange UUC 48% of Orange officebearers are under 40 while just a quarter of Orange UUC members are under 45 29% of Orange officebearers over 50, while 66% of UUC Orange members were over 55

49. The Regional Base of the UUC

50. Findings: Social Profile Major status difference between Orange leadership/membership and Orange UUC delegates UUC profile is elderly and elite Explains why Protestant alienation from the UUP may be greater than from the Orange Explains why many Orange leaders and a majority of the membership wish to break the link with the UUC while Orange UUC delegates do not

51. GFA Voting Dynamics: Previous Survey Research Orange Order membership and age were clearly important (p < .001) Much unexplained: R2 = .1 predicting 1998 vote and .03 in predicting 'Vote Today' Concluded that division lay between 'Orange skeptics' and 'rational civics'

52. Support for the Agreement by UUP Constituency Association, c. 2002

53. UUC Constituency Profile: Rural

54. UUC Constituency Profile: Status