1 / 25

IMMIGRATION AND ITS IMPACT ON INTERNATIONAL FAMILY LAW

IMMIGRATION AND ITS IMPACT ON INTERNATIONAL FAMILY LAW. June 20, 2014 11:00 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. Presented by: Moderator: Christina Angell, Law and Mediation Offices of Christina L. Angell, San Francisco, CA Gary Caswell, Nunez & Caswell, San Antonio, TX

oswald
Download Presentation

IMMIGRATION AND ITS IMPACT ON INTERNATIONAL FAMILY LAW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IMMIGRATION AND ITS IMPACT ON INTERNATIONAL FAMILY LAW June 20, 2014 11:00 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. Presented by: • Moderator: Christina Angell, Law and Mediation Offices of Christina L. Angell, San Francisco, CA • Gary Caswell, Nunez & Caswell, San Antonio, TX Monica Eav, Law Offices of Robert D. Ahlgren and Associates, P.C., Chicago, IL

  2. Overview of Immigration Law Fundamentals Federal government agencies involved in immigration matters and sources of authority “Marriage” and “children” under immigration law Forms of immigration status in the U.S. Removal proceedings Selected forms of relief from removal

  3. I. Federal Government Agencies Involved in Immigration • Within the U.S.: • Formerly: Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) • Since 2003: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) • Removal proceedings: • U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR) • U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) • Outside the U.S.: • U.S. Department of State, Visa Office

  4. I. Where does immigration law come from? • STATUTE: “INA” = Immigration and Nationality Act, codified at 8 U.S.C. 1101 et al., e.g. “Section 245(i) of the INA” • REGULATIONS:8 C.F.R. et al. • USCIS POLICY MEMORANDA • ADMINISTRATIVE AND FEDERAL COURT DECISIONS • Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) • U.S. Courts of Appeal

  5. II. “Marriage” • To be valid for immigration purposes: • Legal where performed (including same-sex marriage, proxy marriage, first-cousin marriage) • “Bona fide”, i.e., not entered into for the sole purpose of obtaining immigration benefits • Note: Marriage to a U.S. Citizen or Legal Permanent Resident does not automatically confer any benefit or immigration status to spouse or children

  6. II. “Children” • Unmarried • Under 21 years old (generally) • Child Status Protection Act sometimes prevents age-out • Stepchildren • Treated same as a biological child, if marriage was entered into before child turned 18 years old • No adoption or legal custody by stepparent is necessary • Adopted children • Adoption must take place while child is under age of 16 (generally) • If Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption applies: • Adoption agency must be accredited by Council on Accreditation • Studies must be done in both countries re: fitness of the adoptive parents and fitness of the child to be adopted • If child has two living parents, they must be incapable of providing proper care for the child • If non-Hague Convention adoption: • Must establish legal and physical custody of child by the adopting parent/parents for at least 2 years

  7. III. Types of Immigration Status • U.S. Citizenship • Able to petition for other family members to immigrate to U.S., can live/work inside or outside U.S. • Legal Permanent Resident • Able to petition for spouses and unmarried children only, can lawfully work and reside in the U.S. • Must not “abandon” residence in the U.S. • Non-Immigrant Status • Able to enter the U.S. for limited purpose and timeframe

  8. IV. Removal Proceedings • AKA Deportation Proceedings • Before an Immigration Judge in an Immigration Court under the U.S. Department of Justice • “Respondent” = defendant • “Assistant Chief Counsel for DHS-ICE” = prosecutor • Charge(s): Present in the U.S. in violation of immigration law • No age limit – babies can be named as respondents • Certain forms of “relief from removal” are available under the INA • If relief is granted by the Immigration Judge, Respondent usually becomes a Legal Permanent Resident, or at the least will be allowed to continue residing in the U.S.

  9. V. Relief: Asylum • Can be filed “affirmatively” with USCIS or “defensively” as a defense in removal proceedings • Unable or unwilling to return to home country, due to past persecution or well-founded fear of future persecution in home country on the ground of race, religion, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group • Membership in a social group examples: Filipinos of mixed Chinese-Filipino ancestry; young women of a certain tribe who oppose female genital mutilation; Guatemalan women; difficulties in defining social group for children who fear gang-related violence in Central America

  10. V. Relief: Cancellation of Removal of Non-Permanent Residents • Section 240A(b) of INA • At least 10 years of continuous residence in the U.S. up until the date that removal proceedings are initiated • Has been a person of good moral character during the 10-year period • Does not have certain criminal convictions • Including certain crimes of domestic violence • If removed from the U.S., LPR/USC spouse, parent(s), and/or child(ren) would suffer exceptional and extremely unusual hardship

  11. V. Relief: VAWA Cancellation of Removal • “Battered or subjected to extreme cruelty” by U.S. Citizen or Legal Permanent Resident spouse or parent • Present in U.S. for at least 3 years before application • Good moral character during 3-year period • Cannot have certain criminal convictions • If deported, extreme hardship would result to the respondent him/herself, or his/her U.S. Citizen/Legal Permanent Resident child, or his/her U.S. Citizen/Legal Permanent Resident parent

  12. V. Relief: Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) • Section 101(a)(27(J) of the INA • Self-petition by a child (under 21, unmarried) who has been abused, abandoned, or neglected by one or both parents • 1st step: Action in a state court that has jurisdiction over custody and care of juveniles. • Child is dependent on the juvenile court, or ward of the state, or under the custody of an individual/entity appointed by the state/court. • Judge must make specific findings that: 1) reunification with one or both parents is not “viable” due to the abuse/abandonment/neglect and 2) it is not in child’s best interest to be returned to home country. • In many states, such as IL, child must be under 18. • 2nd step: File Form I-360 self-petition with USCIS, including judge’s findings. • 3rd step (in some cases, can be simultaneous with 2nd step): File I-485 application for permanent resident status. • Generally, once an I-360 petition has been approved, Immigration Judges will terminate removal proceedings to allow the child to continue with the 3rd step.

  13. V. Relief: VAWA Petitions • Self-petition by an individual who resided in a domestic relationship with abusive spouse, parent, or adult son/daughter (elder abuse) • Abuser is/was USC or LPR • “Battery or extreme cruelty” (mental and/or physical) • If divorced, must file within 2 years of divorce, wait to remarry • 1st step: File form I-360 self-petition with USCIS • 2nd step (sometimes can be done simultaneously with 1st step): File Form I-485 application for permanent resident status • Once I-360 petition has been granted, Immigration Judges will usually terminate to allow Respondent to continue with 2nd step.

  14. V. Relief: U Visas • Victim of crime that took place inside the U.S. (no time limit) • Certain crimes qualify (e.g., rape, sexual abuse, domestic violence, felony assault, stalking, labor exploitation) • Victim was/is likely to be helpful in investigation • Certification by one: • Law enforcement • Prosecutor • Judge • Non-immigrant status, but can apply for Legal Permanent Resident status after 3 years of continuous residence with U Visa • Once U Visa status has been granted, Immigration Judges will terminate proceedings.

  15. Overview of Hague Convention on Child Abduction

  16. HAGUE CONVENTION OVERVIEW • Potentially applies were a child has been taken from his habitual residence in one Contracting State to another Contracting State. • Addresses the issue of forum: where should custody and visitation issues be decided? 91 Contracting States Agree that it is in the best interest of the child that the judicial or administrative authority of the State of his habitual residence make custody/access determinations (Preamble)

  17. OVERVIEW CONT’D • Goals: Secure prompt return of wrongfully removed or retained children and ensure rights of custody and access of one Contracting State are effectively respected in the other Contracting States • Left-behind parent may file an application with the Central Authority of the child’s habitual residence or any other Contracting State for assistance (Art 8) or apply directly to the judicial or administrative authorities (Art (29) • States must use the most expeditious procedures available (Art 2) and judicial and administrative authorities shall act expeditiously (Art 11)

  18. International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA) • Hague Convention Implementing legislation for the U.S. • Wrongfully removed or retained children shall be promptly returned • Left-behind parent may file in State or Federal Court • Courts shall not decide merits of custody • Prescribes burdens of proof for exceptions to return • Court ordering return shall order respondent to pay court costs, legal fees, foster or other care, and transportation

  19. Exceptions or defenses to Return of Child (BOP = Preponderance) • “Well-settled”: If proceeding commenced more than 1 year after removal, the Court shall also order the return unless it is demonstrated that child is now settled in the U.S. (Art. 12) • Age-out: Convention ceases to apply once child turns 16 (Art. 4) • Petitioning parent was not actually exercising custody rights at time of removal or consented to or subsequently acquiesced in the removal or return (Art. 13a) • “Mature Child”: Child objects to return and is of sufficient age and maturity to have his views taken into account (Art. 13)

  20. Exceptions or defenses, cont’d(BOP = Clear and Convincing) • “Grave risk”: Return would expose child to physical or psychological harm or “otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation” (Art. 13b) • “Human rights” exception: U.S. can refuse to send child back if return would violate its fundamental principles relating to human rights and fundamental freedoms (Art. 20)

  21. U.S. Supreme Court Cases • Abbott v. Abbott, 130 S. Ct. 1983 (2010). • Visitation only + Ne Exeat = Rights of Custody. • Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S. Ct. 1017 (2013). • Return of child does not render appeal Moot. • Lozano v. Alvarez, No. 12–820 (2014). • Secreting child location does not toll Art. 12 - 1 year rule.

  22. Hypotheticals

  23. Hypothetical #1 (Lopez Sanchez): • 3 Mexican children are raised by mother, who separated from father since children were young. • In 2011, maternal aunt takes children across the border illegally to the U.S., to reside with maternal uncle. • Mother demands that children return. Aunt brings children to border, but oldest child refuses to return to Mexico. Instead, he and 2 younger children turn themselves in to ICE border authorities. • Children are placed in removal proceedings by DHS. • Children are placed in foster care. • Mother files Hague petition in Mexico for her children’s return. • Mother files petition in U.S. District Court in San Antonio, TX. • Children’s pro bono counsel files asylum applications for children before USCIS. • Children’s pro bono counsel also files state court action regarding children and their biological parents’ custodial and other rights. • In federal court action, children’s pro bono counsel argues that the relevant immigration statute trumps Hague Convention. Also argues that the “grave risk of harm” and the “human rights” exceptions to Hague Convention apply, due to allegations that mother’s ex-boyfriend was violent and/or a gang member. • District Court judge orders return of children under Hague Convention but grants stay of order pending appeal. • While 5th Circuit Appeal is pending, children are granted asylum by USCIS. • Children are now 16, 14 and 9 years old.

  24. Hypothetical #2: • Indian mancomes to U.S. on an H1B work visa, wife accompanies him with an H4 visa as his spouse. They go on to have 2 children born in the U.S. • Husband becomes an LPR through his employer, but does not file application for his wife. • Husband is abusive. • Wife wants a divorce and to stay in the U.S. • Pending dissolution of marriage, wife wants to return to home country with children to visit her dying parent. • Husband says he will consider renouncing custody if she agrees that she will not seek spousal and/or child support.

  25. Hypothetical #3: • 3 children: 16-year-old born in Honduras who came to U.S. illegally with his parents over 10 years ago; 10-year-old and 5-year-old, both born in the U.S. • Both parents are Hondurans who have been present in the U.S. illegally for over 10 years • Father is primary breadwinner • Father gets arrested by ICE and is placed in removal proceedings • Mother files for divorce and wants to move back to Honduras with 3 children

More Related