260 likes | 395 Views
Study of Scalar Mesons at BES. Xiaoyan SHEN Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS QWG3 Oct. 12 – 15, 2004, Beijing. Outline. Introduction Light Scalar Mesons: , f 0 (980) f 0 (1370) f 0 (1500) f 0 (1710), f 0 (1790)
E N D
Study of Scalar Mesons at BES Xiaoyan SHEN Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS QWG3 Oct. 12 – 15, 2004, Beijing
Outline • Introduction • Light Scalar Mesons:, f0(980) f0(1370) f0(1500) f0(1710), f0(1790) • Summary
Introduction World J/ and (2S) Samples (×106) BESII Detector BESII 58MJ/ J/ BESII 14M(2S) • VC: xy = 100 m TOF: T = 180 ps • MDC: xy = 220 m BSC: E/E= 21 % • dE/dx= 8.5 % = 7.9 mr • p/p=1.78(1+p2) z = 2.3 cm • counter: r= 3 cm B field: 0.4 T z = 5.5 cm (2S)
Light Scalar Mesons:σ, κ, f0(980), f0(1370), f0(1500), f0(1710), f0(1790)
Why are light scalar mesons interesting? • There have been hot debates on the existence of and. • Lattice QCD predicts the 0++ scalar glueball mass from 1.5 - 1.7 GeV. f0(1500) and f0(1710) are good candidates. • f0(1370), f0(1500), f0(1710) were found in the fixed target, ppbar, e+e- experiments. The confirmation of them is important.
The pole in 0 M(+-0) M() M(+-)
Fit to J/→+ (whole mass region) Method I: Channels fitted to the data: J/f2(1270) f0(980) b1(1235) ’(1450) f2(1565) f2(2240) b1(1235) preliminary f2 contribution f0 contribution
Fit to J/→+ (M < 1.5 GeV) f2 contribution Method II: Channels fitted to the data: J/f2(1270) f0(980) b1(1235) phase space f0 contribution
Fit results: Method I Method II Averaged pole position: MeV P. L. B 598 (2004) 149-158
ρ(770) K*(892) K0*(1430), K2*(1430) K1(1270), K1(1400)
BES Preliminary K*0(1430) κ
Study of f0(980), f0(1370), f0(1500), f0(1710) and f0(1790) from:
f0(980) at BES • Important parameters from PWA fit: • Large coupling with KK indicates big component in f0(980) f0(980) BES II Preliminary f0(980)
f0(1370) at BES • There has been some debate whether f0(1370) exists or not. • f0(1370)clearly seen in J/ , but not seen in J/ . f0(1370) BES II Preliminary NO f0(1370) PWA 0++ components
f0(1710) at BES • Clear f0(1710) peak in J/ KK. • Nof0(1710) observed in J/ ! f0(1710) BES II Preliminary NO f0(1710)
New f0(1790) at BES ?? • A clear peak around 1790 MeV is observed in J/ . • No evident peak in J/ KK. If f0(1790) were the same as f0(1710), we would have: Inconsistent with what we observed in J/ , KK f0(1790) BES II Preliminary ? Is f0(1790) a new scalar ??
Scalars in J/ , KK Two scalars in J/ : • One is around 1470 MeV, => f0(1500) • The other is around 1765 MeV, is it f0(1790) or f0(1710) or a mixture of f0(1710) and f0(1790)? BES II Preliminary
PWA analysis shows one scalar. Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 052003
BES Preliminary BES Preliminary
f0(1500) at BES • One scalar with a mass = 1466 6 16 MeV is needed in J/ . f0(1500). • No peak directly seen in , KK, , KK.
OZI rule and flavor tagging in J/ hadronic decays • In J/ hadronic decays, an or signal determinesthe or component, respectively. OZI rule
Unusual properties of f0(1370), f0(1710) and f0(1790) • f0(1710): • It dominantly decays to KK (not to ) • It is mainly produced together with (not ) • What is it ? • f0(1370) and f0(1790) • They dominantly decays to (not to KK) • It is mainly produced together with (not ) • What are they ? Scalar Puzzle – no good answer yet!
Summay • pole obtained in J/ • pole in J/K*K and KK • the parameters of f0(980) are determined • scalar puzzle? Further study needed.
Thank you! 谢谢!