1 / 13

Dioxins (PCDD/Fs) in San Francisco Estuary

Dioxins (PCDD/Fs) in San Francisco Estuary. Mike Connor, Donald Yee , Jay Davis, Christine Werme RMP Annual Meeting May 2004. Dioxins- Background. Polychlorinated dibenzo dioxins and furans (PCDD/Fs) Toxic compounds w/ 4 (TCDD/F) to 8 (OCDD/F) chlorines

otto
Download Presentation

Dioxins (PCDD/Fs) in San Francisco Estuary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dioxins (PCDD/Fs) in San Francisco Estuary Mike Connor, Donald Yee, Jay Davis, Christine Werme RMP Annual Meeting May 2004

  2. Dioxins- Background • Polychlorinated dibenzo dioxins and furans (PCDD/Fs) • Toxic compounds w/ 4 (TCDD/F) to 8 (OCDD/F) chlorines • 2,3,7,8 TCDD toxicity equivalent factors (TEQs) • Toxicity TCDD/F >> OCDD/F • Concentrations TCDD/F << OCDD/F • Concentrations often near detection limits • Data less abundant than other pollutants • PCBs w/ TEQs addressed in PCB conceptual model

  3. Dioxins- Available Data Analytical Issues • Concentrations not detected (water, sediment) • ND = 0 (optimist) or ND = MDL (pessimist) • TCDD/F and other more toxic dioxins less abundant • NDs = (possible large) impact on TEQs • Temporal and spatial variability • NOAA-EMAP sediment site replicates > 10x differences • Refinery effluent 10xincrease sample size – 2x decrease in average concentration and variability (RSD%)

  4. Dioxins- Sources • Combustion by-products • Yard waste, wood, vehicle fuel, municipal and medical incineration • Chlorine process by-products • Pesticides, wood pulp bleaching, PVC • Dioxins have legacy component, but also • Ongoing point/disperse sources (USEPA national inventory) • 1987: Incineration > smelting > yard burning > pulp bleaching • 2002: Yard burning > home fireplace ~coal burning ~ sludge (land) > diesel ~ 2,4-D (land)

  5. Dioxins- National Source Trends nonpoint point

  6. Dioxin- Fish Tissue Concentrations

  7. Impacted Organisms

  8. Ecosystem Transfers

  9. Loss Pathways ? ? ??

  10. Sources and Loading Pathways ? ? ? ?? ??

  11. Dioxins- Information Gaps • Better quantitative data • Improvements in analyses and extent of data • Prioritizing (given high analytical costs) • Monitoring biological receptors • Most direct relationship to impacts • Spatial and time integrators • Largest loads and reservoirs • Rivers and tributaries (conveying current and legacy deposits) • Sediment deposit profiles (history and distribution)

  12. Dioxins- Management Options, Long Term Prospects • Easier steps taken possible even w/o further information (addressing other issues): • Fish consumption advisories (PCBs, Hg) • Restrictions on yard burning (general air quality) • Wood-burning advisories, construction/remodel restrictions • Harder steps (needing better information to prioritize) • Addressing watershed and in-bay legacy • Have past and current changes had impact?

More Related