240 likes | 380 Views
Research Curriculum Session II –Study Subjects, Variables and Outcome Measures. Jim Quinn MD MS Research Director , Division of Emergency Medicine Stanford University. Overview. Study Subjects Sampling Recruitment Variables Types of outcome measures
E N D
Research CurriculumSession II –Study Subjects, Variables and Outcome Measures Jim Quinn MD MS Research Director , Division of Emergency Medicine Stanford University
Overview • Study Subjects • Sampling • Recruitment • Variables • Types of outcome measures • Precision, accuracy, validity, reliability
Study SubjectsGeneralizing the Results “Research is only interesting to others if they can apply it to their practice”
Study Subjects • Subjects in the study sample should be representative of the population of interest • Depending on study different populations may yield different results. • Examples: General population, ED patients, Clinic Patients, Attitudes of patients • Laceration studies, syncope study
Study Subjects • Specify the best clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population to best answer question • Appropriate sampling from that target population • Results = truth in the study • Best possible chance to have the results generalizable.
Selection CriteriaDefining the Target Population • Inclusion Criteria • defines the main characteristics of the target population – be specific
Selection CriteriaDefining the Target Population • Exclusion Criteria • Individuals whose characteristics may interfere with the quality of the results E.g. – rare events, poor follow-up - May compromise generalizability of the study
Sampling • Convenience Sample • Consecutive Sample Probability Samples - Simple Random Sample • Stratified Random Sample • Cluster Samples
RecruitmentGoals • A sample that represents the target population - Non responders, lost follow-up • Enough subjects to meet sample size requirements - Play it safe, overestimate - There is always fewer patients than you think!
Outcome Measures Selection of Variables and Scales
Selection of VariablesPractical Points/Precision/Accuracy • Continuous Variables • “discrete” variables • rich in information • Potential sample size “relief” • Categorical • Dichotomous • Nominal • Ordinal
Measurement Scales • Categorical Variables • Phenomena often not suited for measurement (e.g. Death) • Dichotomous • Nominal • Ordinal – categories have order but no specific numerical or uniform difference
Measurement Scales • Continuous (infinite values) • Ordered discrete (ordinal with numerical meaning) - Statistically handled very similarly
Measurement ScalesSummary • Categorical • Scales may have more meaning and make more sense. • Less information, need large numbers • Continuous • some times hard to determine meaningful differences • sample size friendly
Attributes of Outcome MeasuresPrecision • Is the measure “reproducible, reliable and consistent” • Subject to random error and variability • Observer variability • Instrument variability • Subject variability
Assessing Precision • Inter and Intraobserver reproducibility • Within and between instrument reproducibility • Continuous variables – Coefficient of variation • Categorical – kappa statistic
Enhancing Precision • Standardize measurement methods • Train and certify observers • Refining the instruments • Automating the instrument • Repetition (reduces random error)
Accuracy “Does the variable actually measure or represent what it intends to” Assessed by comparison to a “Gold Standard” Different than precision, but many things that improve precision improve accuracy A function of systematic error • Observer bias • Subject Bias • Instrument Bias
Enhancing Accuracy • Standardized measurement methods • Training observers • Refining instruments • Automating instruments • Making Unobtrusive measures • Blinding • Calibration of Instruments
ValidityAccuracy when there is no “Gold Standard” • Measuring an abstract or subjective phenomena (e.g. – pain, quality of life) • Content Validity (Face, Inherent or sampling validity) • Construct Validity • Criterion Related Validity (Predictive Validity)
Final Thoughts • An outcome measure should be sensitive enough to determine important clinical differences • It should be associated with only the characteristic of interest • Measurements should involve data collection that is efficient in time and cost • Efficiency is improved by increasing the quality of each item measured