1 / 14

Monitoring & Evaluation Terminology

Monitoring & Evaluation Terminology. Same Same but Difference. Monitoring Evaluation Auditing. Project Design and Monitoring Framework (DMF). Project Results Framework (NZ, AUSAID) Logical Framework or Logframe (UN, USAID, EU, etc.).

pabla
Download Presentation

Monitoring & Evaluation Terminology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Monitoring & EvaluationTerminology

  2. Same Same but Difference • Monitoring • Evaluation • Auditing

  3. Project Design and Monitoring Framework (DMF) Project Results Framework (NZ, AUSAID) Logical Framework or Logframe (UN, USAID, EU, etc.) An integrated part of design documents, the primary source used during implementation, evaluation, and post - evaluation

  4. Logframe

  5. ADB’s Design & Monitoring Framework (DMF)

  6. Design Logic and Monitorability Impact Outcome Outcome

  7. Impact Chain

  8. ADB Project Performance Management System Design Management Reporting Evaluation Post Evaluation PAM (Project Document or Inception Report) Concept Paper RRP TA Paper PPR TPR PCR TCR PPER TPER

  9. M&E System • The process of monitoring, evaluating, and comparing planned results with actual results to determine the progress toward • Cost • Schedule • Technical Performance Objectives • Strategic fit

  10. Substantive Focus Performance Relevance Program Quality SUCCESS

  11. Key criteria • relevance – the degree to which the objectives of a programme remain valid and significant; • performance – progress of a programme towards achieving its objectives, in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and timeliness; • success – attaining a measurable level of benefits that can be directly attributed to the programme, in terms of impact, sustainability and capacity development.

  12. M&E Standard Criteria • Relevance • Development Issues • Target Groups • Direct Beneficiaries • Performance • Effectiveness • Efficiency • Timeliness of inputs and results • Success • Impact • Sustainability • Contribution to Capacity Development

  13. Measurements • Indicators – What to be measures • Targets – how much by when • Baselines – current status • Milestones – achieving an activity • With vs Without • Before vs After

  14. Specific Measurable Achievable Relevant Time-bound A good balance should be achieved between theory and practice, i.e., between what should be and what can be measured SMART Indicators Indicators are "yardsticks" that can be used to demonstrate that changes have (or have not) taken place. They provide meaningful and comparable information on changes.

More Related