380 likes | 482 Views
The Gateway Science Workshop (GSW). Sustainability and Implementation of a Peer-Led Undergraduate Program Cindy Pederson Northwestern University Searle Center for Teaching Excellence May 18, 2006. Enriching the Academic Success of College Science Students, 2006 Conference. Overview.
E N D
The Gateway Science Workshop (GSW) Sustainability and Implementation of a Peer-Led Undergraduate Program Cindy Pederson Northwestern University Searle Center for Teaching Excellence May 18, 2006 Enriching the Academic Success of College Science Students, 2006 Conference
Overview • Background • Structure • History • Students • Facilitators • Faculty • University administration
Background The Problem The small number of high-achieving undergraduates from underrepresented groups who successfully persist in math and science-based courses of study. (National Task Force on Minority High Achievement, 1999, Hanson, 1996)
Background GSW Goals • Improve performance & retention of under-represented groups in STEM disciplines • Increase overall number of majors in STEM disciplines • Increase number of majors in under-represented groups in STEM disciplines • Increase number of under-represented students pursuing careers in STEM disciplines
Background Program Foundations - Emerging Scholars Program (Treisman) - Stereotype Threat (Steele and Aronson)
Background Theoretical Basis • Small groups • Non-remedial • Conceptually focused
Background Program Overview Searle Center for Teaching Excellence 5 Researchers 2 Program coordinators 2 Program assistants Biology Chemistry Engineering Mathematics Physics 11 Classes 4–23 Workshops/Class 125 Facilitators (16 Senior Facilitators) 1274 Students Applied 705 Students Enrolled * Numbers based on fall 2005 data
Background GSW History
Background GSW Structure • Workshop • Problems • Conceptual • Challenging
Background Key Aspects • Voluntary • 0-credit notation • Facilitators • Senior facilitators • Weekly meetings • Workshops • Sunday-Thursday • 11:00 am -7:00 pm • Meet 9 times a quarter
Students Creating a Valued Framework
Students GSW Students
Students Student Requirements • Emotional • Peer to lead workshop • Learning from other students • GSW community • Advanced worksheets • Academic • Relevance • Ability of problems to identify misconceptions QUALITY !!
Quality • Facilitators • Worksheets • Program community
Facilitators Creating a Valued Framework
Facilitators GSW Facilitators
Facilitators Reward • 2002-2003: Pilot project • Certificate and Pay • 2003-2004: One credit course • Certificate and option of pay or academic credit • 2004-present: One credit course • Certificate and academic credit
Facilitators SESP 291: Undergraduate Teaching and Mentoring
Facilitators Facilitator Gains Streitweiser, Micari, Paper presented at the Professional and Organizational Development (POD) Network in Higher Education annual conference, October 9, 2003
Facilitators Facilitator Comments • Cognitive: Learning by explaining “Even though I learned a lot [when I took the course], having to do it again, and seeing it from a different point of view, and having to actually prepare for it so you can explain it to the students, it makes you learn it that much better.” • Professional: Preparation for placement exams “I just took the MCAT, so definitely having had to explain it to my students, I know the subject pretty well. And, when it was on the MCAT, I was like, ‘Oh, well, I know this, so that was kind of nice.’” • Interpersonal: Insight into the art and practice of teaching “I think [facilitating requires] more than I expected. I’ve noticed you can get by without doing a whole lot of preparation, but when you really put in the effort, it makes a huge difference in your workshop.” Streitweiser, Micari, Paper presented at the Professional and Organizational Development (POD) Network in Higher Education annual conference, October 9, 2003
Students Student Ratings of Facilitators by Discipline(Spring 2003 )
Faculty Creating a Valued Framework
Faculty GSW Faculty
Faculty Faculty Involvement Traditional Faculty Commitments Committee meetings/ service Research Publishing Teaching Advising Securing grants/ funding Expectations of GSW Faculty One feedback interview w/ the Searle Center; attending appreciation dinners Writing workshop problems Meeting weekly with the facilitators B. Strietweiser, M. Micari Support from the Core:Faculty Commitment to a STEM Learning Intervention, POD, 2005
Faculty Faculty Requirements • Administrative support • Evidence of positive outcomes • A personal, intellectual commitment to the ideals behind the program/initiative • An opportunity to share in the interpretation of the data and decisions made about the future of the initiative B. Strietweiser, M. Micari Support from the Core:Faculty Commitment to a STEM Learning Intervention, POD, 2005
Faculty Faculty Suggestions for Program Improvement • Provide better training for facilitators • Link conceptual study with problem solving study • A core group of successful problems • Provide tracking data on students after they leave the program • Recognize the faculty’s participation more and inform the deans and department heads about it • Expand the program to second and third year students B. Strietweiser, M. Micari Support from the Core:Faculty Commitment to a STEM Learning Intervention, POD, 2005
Faculty Faculty Support • Administrative support • Worksheets • Students • Weekly meetings • Problem Bank • Appreciation
Administration Creating a Valued Framework
Administration Program Coordination University Administration Faculty Program Coordinator • Worksheets • and evaluations • Weekly meetings • Recruitment • Registration • Workshop locations • Support Facilitators Students GSW Team • Recruitment • Training • Advertisement • Registration • Dissemination • Evaluation • Research
Administration Program Sustainability • Biology department • 1997-1999 • Andrew W. Mellon grant • 2001-2003 • 2004-2006 • Step 1 NSF grant: • Extended Science Workshop Program • 2005-
Administration Budgeting • To pay or not to pay? • Program administration • As you grow: • Instructional materials • Senior facilitators? • Food
Administration Program Growth • Start slow • Must have: • Faculty support • Administrative support • Evaluation plan • Financial/institutional reward
Administration How Big is too Big? • Relevant classes • Class size and participation • Facilitators • Cost • Administrative help • Faculty
Administration Challenges • Faculty involvement - training facilitators - general investment in the program • Problem construction • Data collection for the evaluation
Acknowledgements • GSW PI: Gregory Light • GSW Research Team • Denise Drane • Marina Micari • Pilar Pazos • Bernhard Streitwieser • GSW administration • Christina Bobek • Sarah Smith • Su Swarat • Cory Waxman