110 likes | 343 Views
Daglig borerapport. Project meeting March 23 2006. Agenda. 1. Status terminologi-definisjon - Presentere terminologi etter møter med BP, ConocoPhillips, Statoil, Hydro og programvareleverandører - Avklare behov for videreutvikling av terminologien 2. Planer for det videre arbeidet
E N D
Daglig borerapport Project meeting March 23 2006
Agenda 1. Status terminologi-definisjon - Presentere terminologi etter møter med BP, ConocoPhillips, Statoil, Hydro og programvareleverandører - Avklare behov for videreutvikling av terminologien 2. Planer for det videre arbeidet - Generering av XML-skjema - Tilrettelegging av LicenseWeb for daglig borerapportering - Produksjonssetting 3. Eventuelt
Current Plan Date Task 26.01 Project meeting (1-06) 24.02 Daily Drilling Report Terminology based on CDRS suggested. 06.03 Meeting Hydro 07.03 Meeting Statoil 08.03 Meeting ConocoPhillips 09.03 Meeting BP 10.03 Start updating according to feedback from meetings and review 23.03 Project meeting (2-06) 31.03 Terminology work complete xx.04 2-3 days XML kick off, POSC, Capgemini, project participants 25.04 Project meeting (3-06) ? 23.05 Project meeting (4-06) ? 31.07 XML schemas complete 01.08 Start Pilot, and adjust 31.08 Project meeting (5-06) – decision to recommends implementation?
Summary • Met and reviewed terminology with drilling experts and it-professionals from operators and vendors. • Statoil • Hydro • Conocophillips • Total • BP • Peloton • Landmark • Approximately 140 issues and comments from meetings. • To be resolved by PSA/OD, Operators and DNV
Open tasks in project • Issue resolution • Phase 1:CDRS including minor changes from NPD/PSA and other project participants. • Phase 2:Major gaps? • Create XML schemas • Kick off meeting mid April with Capgemini, POSC and DBR participants • Pilots – how, where and when? • Valhall one possible case • + one other case
Review details Project meeting March 23 2006
Review details 1 • The information in CDRS will cover partner reporting • Clarification of terms and definitions • GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION – relative to what? • FORMATION PORE PRESSURE – is this measured or predicted? • Time codes/activities/operations • SUPERIOR • Not logical with BOP TEST • MAIN OPERATION & SUB OPERATION • Done differently from company to company • DOWN TIME/INTERUPTION not linked to interrupted operation in CDRS • Seems to be a need for more downtime details than CDRS provides • Hydro has suggested new coding • Complex job....
Review details 2 • Suggested additional information • Cement • Period of operation • “Drilling like” units of measure • Hours in stead of minutes • Inches in stead of meters • Etc... • Formation name – selection list • Use Survey tools not “Single shot measurement indicator” • Datum (reference points) • Mean sea level • Wellhead • Casing type • Tapered string • Expandable • Pressurized coring • Indicator
Review details 3 • Suggested additional information (cont.) • Well stimulation (At well testing) indicator • “Shallow water kick” is a kick type • Perforation - Shot density • RIG ID • RIGTYPE • Bit data • Side track • Technical side track (BP) • Geological side track (BP) • Tight wells
Phase 1 vs. Phase 2 - suggestion Phase 2 • Operation codes • Cement • Period of operation • “Drilling like units of measure • Formation name – selection list • Datum (reference points) • Casing type • Pressurized coring • Well stimulation (At well testing) indicator • Perforation - Shot density • RIGTYPE • Bit data • Side track • Tight wells • ++ Phase 1 • CDRS information • Clarification of terms and definitions • Use Survey tools not “Single shot measurement indicator” • RIG ID
Daily Drilling Report – suggested sections • Basic information • Status • Mud data • Pore pressure • Present operation • Survey • Operation/mode • Log • Core • Well production test • Well Formation Test (WFT) • Weather • Remarks– Removed from CDRS • Lithology • Equipment failure • Well Control Incident • Preliminary zonation • Perforation intervals