140 likes | 700 Views
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI). ?Hot topic" since October 2008CMS* no longer allows for increased reimbursement for diagnosis and treatment of CAUTI Considered by CMS* as a ?Never Event"* Centers for Medicare
E N D
1. Deploying a Nurse Driven Protocol for Foley Removal (NDPFR): One Hospital’s Experience Joyce E. Wenger MSN, RN
Lancaster General Hospital, Lancaster, Pa
jowenger@lghealth.org
2. Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) “Hot topic” since October 2008
CMS* no longer allows for increased reimbursement for diagnosis and treatment of CAUTI
Considered by CMS* as a “Never Event”
* Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
3. CAUTI: THE PROBLEM CAUTI reportedly ? hospital mortality 3-fold
Each CAUTI adds $500 - $2000 to costs of hospitalization
1- 3 % risk for hospital acquired BSI or urosepsis (>100,000 cases/yr)
Enormous reservoir of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, especially VRE, resistant GNRs and yeasts. Biofilms protect the bacteria
Maki , VHA teleconference
4. Evidence Based PracticeHow to Prevent CAUTI SHEA Supplement
October 2008 Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
HICPAC & CDC Guideline (2009)
IDSA Guideline
March 2010 Clinical Infectious Disease
5. Initiatives to DecreaseCAUTI Rates @ LGH A Three Tiered Approach
Education
Quality Product
Nurse Driven Protocol
6. Education & Re-education Collection of Urine Specimens
Addressed clean catch, mid stream technique
Insertion
Sterile technique
Securement
Maintaining closed system
Location of bag at all times
Not on floor
Lower than bladder
7. Quality Product Closed System
Tamper Evidence Seal (Bard Medical)
Securement Device
LGH chose Statlock
Antimicrobial Catheters
LGH chose Bard Medical Silver alloy
Collection of urine specimen direct transfer device
LGH chose BD Diagnostics
8. Rationale for Education & Product Upgrade before NDPFR Contaminated urine specimens
Rate was too high to track valid results of any progress
If all specimens are collected as contaminated, CAUTI rates would be Zero
Looks good on paper
Not helpful “to anyone” for “any purpose”
No way to assess progress (or lack thereof)
9. Rationale . . . (continued) No protocol will compensate for poor Foley care
Do not forget the basics!!!
If product upgrades are forthcoming, education on product use should occur
General education will occur at the same time
Advisable to not change multiple things at one time as impact of changes difficult to evaluate
10. The Process:
timely
small steps of change
11. Our Journey @ LGH Occurred over several years
Required nurses to think differently about
Foley catheter necessity
Nurse’s role in management of Foley catheters
12. Nurse Driven Protocol Challenges Nurses are hesitant to remove Foley without physician order
Definitions on tool are expanded (by nurses)to keep Foley longer than necessary
Foleys are kept in for convenience and tool left blank
13. Considerations Protocol criteria should be measurable
Criteria to be clearly defined that every nurse will conclude the same outcome for the same patient
Educate physicians and hospital administration before deployment
Physician champions required to address physician questions
Obtain approval from appropriate nursing and physician leadership teams
14. QuestionsorComments