1 / 10

VACANCIES FOR INDUCTION OF GR`B’ TO GR`A’

VACANCIES FOR INDUCTION OF GR`B’ TO GR`A’. - V.NATARAJAN,. Share of Gr.B in Gr`A’. Except IRPS which had 50:50 from constitution of service in 1975. The ratio adopted now is only 25% for Gr`B’ instead of 50%.

palmer-malone
Download Presentation

VACANCIES FOR INDUCTION OF GR`B’ TO GR`A’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. VACANCIES FOR INDUCTION OF GR`B’ TO GR`A’ - V.NATARAJAN,

  2. Share of Gr.B in Gr`A’ Except IRPS which had 50:50 from constitution of service in 1975. The ratio adopted now is only 25% for Gr`B’ instead of 50%

  3. Service wise distribution of Promotee Quota for Gr`A’ induction during last 5 years

  4. How vacancies for Gr`A’ induction for 06-07 was calculated

  5. Department wise breakup of vacancies for Gr`A’ induction for 07-08 compared with 06-07

  6. Distortion in cadre of Engg & Accounts affecting their induction

  7. Cadre of JTS – How figures stood from year to year

  8. Issue of one time vacancies During 1991 in view of this large scale stagnation in the cadre of group 'B' officers, the Railway Board in consultation with UPSC decided to allot additional posts for induction to Group 'A' for 5 Deptts as under:-

  9. Issue of one time vacancies The additional vacancies traffic & personal were filled up and additional vacancies of civil Engg dept were partially filled (158 out of 238) during the early 1990s. Before it could be implemented fully it was challenged on various tribunals that govt is not entitled to increase the quota for promtee officers However this was challanged by S&T dept which won a supreme court case for the additional vacancies, but as the court case had dragged on for years ended up with more damage. While giving the ruling in favour of officers of S&T department, Supreme court had observed that govt is empowered to vary the %age of intake and that S&T department cannot be treated differently from traffic & stores department. On the basis of supreme court judgment, the same benefit extended to S&T department needs to be extended to Engg dept for the balance 80 vacancies and 52 vacancies of electrical department.

  10. THANKS

More Related