240 likes | 338 Views
Fabrication of a tooth–borne mouthstick for a Quadriplegic. By: J.E. Viljoen. Contents. Patient history Background condition Possible treatment options Treatment option of choice Laboratory procedures. Patient History. 12 Year old female Diagnosed with Guillian–Barr é syndrome
E N D
Fabrication of a tooth–borne mouthstickfor a Quadriplegic By: J.E. Viljoen
Contents • Patient history • Background condition • Possible treatment options • Treatment option of choice • Laboratory procedures
Patient History • 12 Year old female • Diagnosed with Guillian–Barré syndrome • Permanent resident at Tygerberg hospital • Quadriplegic
About Guillian-Barré syndrome • It is a syndrome, not a disease • There is no cure • Attack directed at mayelin – insulation component of the nerves • Affects 1 in 100 000 people • No particular race, gender or age group • Causes paralysis • 75 – 90 % partial or total recovery2
Condition and background information • Needs appliance to facilitate use of a computer • Quadriplegic – limited head movement • Connected to respirator • Weak masseter muscles • Eruption of permanent dentition
Background • Prosthesis was made by occupational therepist • Prosthesis was retained by bite forces • Prosthesis caused pain in Masseter muscles
Possible treatment options • Tooth–borne oral device • A telescopic oral device • Extra–oral chin cap
Tooth–borne oral device Advantages: • No biting forces required • Inexpensive to fabricate • Simple to use • Occlusal forces equally distributed Disadvantages: • Length cannot be altered3
Telescopic oral device Advantages: • Length of extending stick can be altered • No biting forces required • Patient is self-supporting Disadvantages: • Heavy in mass • Difficult to fabricate and use • Expensive to fabricate • Requires maintenance2
Extra–oral chin cap Advantages: • Easy to communicate with • Easy to keep clean Disadvantages: • Uncomfortable for patient • No independence • Complicated to use2
Most suitable treatment option • The tooth-borne device Reasons: • Inexpensive • Simple to use • Easy to fabricate • Not necessary to extend or retract the device
Laboratory procedures • Special trays were fabricated and impressions taken and cast
Laboratory procedures continued • Extra-oral mechanical parts designed, then manufactured by engineering company • Parts made from aluminium • Extra–oral rod has magnetic tip • Various tips made to accommodate patient • Tip snaps in position
Laboratory procedures continued • Two-ply gum-guard material applied to model
Laboratory procedures continued • Gum–guard trimmed to deepest part of sulcus
Laboratory procedures continued • Special dentarum screw-sleeves used to secure mechanical part in position on gum-guard
Laboratory procedures continued • Orthodontic acrylic was applied to gum–guard • Polished
Acknowledgments • Dr Van Zyl • Miss Nortjé • Mr Steyn • Mrs Wright
References: • A.J.Cloran. Telescopic mouth instruments for severely handicapped patients. Journal ofProsthetic Dentistry. 1974; 32(4): 435-438. • Hentschke, P. (2002) Guillian-Barré syndrome. (Web document). Available: http://www.medweb.pc.edu/students/med2003/miller1/guillain.html • J.Smokler. Mouthstick prosthesis for a patient with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Journalof Prosthetic Dentistry. 1979; 42(3): 316-321.