1 / 26

YALE UNIVERSITY SOCIAL SCIENCES BUILDING

YALE UNIVERSITY SOCIAL SCIENCES BUILDING. GPHB & ASSOCIATES Brad Otto, Client Liaison/Editor-in Chief Jake Wagle, Project Engineer Jimmy Murray, Project Engineer Erin R. Craft, Project Engineer Robbie Baldwin, Project Manager. OVERVIEW. Client and Organization Project Description

palmer
Download Presentation

YALE UNIVERSITY SOCIAL SCIENCES BUILDING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. YALE UNIVERSITY SOCIAL SCIENCES BUILDING GPHB & ASSOCIATES Brad Otto, Client Liaison/Editor-in Chief Jake Wagle, Project EngineerJimmy Murray, Project EngineerErin R. Craft, Project Engineer Robbie Baldwin, Project Manager

  2. OVERVIEW • Client and Organization • Project Description • Design Requirements • Project Approach • Design Solution • Conclusion

  3. CLIENT AND ORGANIZATION • Hunt Construction Group - Indianapolis, Indiana - Robert W. Fuller, Construction Manager

  4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut New Haven

  5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Parallel bid process • Identify missed details • Discover alternative approaches • Obtain an understanding of construction methods and procedures

  6. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT • First year a Construction Management Project offered at Rose-Hulman • Learning along the way with our professors • Difficulties fitting design criteria into our project

  7. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS • Constraints - No historical buildings or landmarks may be harmed These areas include: KNOT GARDEN HISTORIC MANSIONS SITE LUCE HALL

  8. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS • Deliverables - Project Proposal - Site Utility Relocation Bid Package - Excavation Support/Shoring Design - Excavation Bid Package - Wall Formwork Selection - Wall Formwork Bid Package

  9. PROJECT APPROACH • Design/Assessment of Options - Utility Relocation - Current utilities run directly through proposed site - Utilities relocated and functioning before excavation begins

  10. PROJECT APPROACH • Sheeting and Shoring - Geotechnical report obtained from Hunt - Considered numerous shoring options Typical Soldier Pile/Lagging System

  11. PROJECT APPROACH • Select Wall Formwork System - Foundation design provided by Hunt Construction - GPHB will select appropriate formwork system - Numerous options in consideration - Criteria of Selection: constructability, cost efficiency, functionality

  12. PROJECT APPROACH • Utility Relocation Bid/Excavation & Formwork Bid - Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) bids - 2006 RS Means Manual - Labor Rate Adjustments - Unit Material Prices - Bonding, Permits, Fees

  13. PROJECT APPROACH • Codes & Regulations - Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) - Connecticut State Building Code - International Building Code (IBC) - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) - LEED Silver Certification (possibly Gold)

  14. UTILITY RELOCATION • Assessed multiple routes for utility relocation • Conducted research for two different excavation methods - Open Trenching - Directional Boring RECOMMENDATION:OPEN TRENCHING because directional boring poses many problems with such a high volume of utilities running beneath Prospect Street.

  15. PROJECT PROGRESS NEWUTILITIES PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTINGUTILITIES NORTH

  16. UTILITY RELOCATION Luce Hall Proposed Building I Existing Utilities Utility Relocation Route Proposed Building II 1 C-1 Prospect Street

  17. UTILITY RELOCATION Existing Utilities Relocation Route 20’-0” 45’-0” 1 C-1

  18. UTILITY RELOCATION • Bid Package 1 Quantity Take-Off- General Conditions/Requirements - Test Pits - Demolition and Access - Sediment and Erosion Control - Utility Excavation/Installation $746,000

  19. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE • Place job trailer • Site Access • Demolition • Soldier Piles • Excavation • Structural Fill N

  20. SOLDIER PILE DESIGN • Soldier Pile / Timber Lagging System • HP 12x53 sections (90) • 45’ long • Embedded 30’ into surface • 5” timber lagging 15’ 30’

  21. SOLDIER PILE DESIGN

  22. REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL FORMWORK SYSTEM • Reinforced Cast-in-Place Concrete Wall • 15 inches thick & 12 feet 8 inches high • Various Temporary Forming Methods • Contractor Preference

  23. REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL FORMWORK SYSTEM Side View X-Section

  24. REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL FORMWORK SYSTEM

  25. CONCLUSION/LESSONS LEARNED • Client satisfied with proposal • All requested designs complete • All requested bid packages complete • Information is difficult to obtain • Experienced bidders have large advantage (Means) • Schedule in advance (Everyone is busy) • Extremely valuable learning experience

  26. QUESTIONS?

More Related