Problems and solutions

1. For any given solution, a frequency planner can find a problem Problems and solutions

2. For some problems a frequency planner can find a solution Problems and solutions

3. Problems and solutions • We have been dealing with a planning exercise • The purpose was to TEST:

4. Problems and solutions • We have been dealing with a planning exercise • The purpose was to TEST: • input data mechanism

5. Problems and solutions • We have been dealing with a planning exercise • The purpose was to TEST: • input data mechanism • computer methods and implementation

6. Problems and solutions • We have been dealing with a planning exercise • The purpose was to TEST: • input data mechanism • computer methods and implementation • reality

7. Problems and solutions • We have been dealing with a planning exercise • The purpose was to TEST: • input data mechanism • computer methods and implementation • reality • planning assumptions

8. Problems and solutions • We have been dealing with a planning exercise • The purpose was to TEST: • input data mechanism • computer methods and implementation • reality • planning assumptions • implications of input data

9. Problems and solutions • In such a complex process • it is inevitable that there will be software problems • it is inevitable that software problems will take time to resolve • it is almost inevitable that additional problems will be introduced during the process of extending the software • it is inevitable that there will be some human errors when applying the software

10. Problems • It may be useful to illustrate some of the problems • in terms of spectrum demand • in a pictorial manner • This makes it more personal • We have heard that there can be many more than 100 mutually incompatible requirements to be accommodated in 49 channels • This is what they look like for three geographic areas

14. It must be noted that due to display limitations it cannot be guaranteed that all of the coverages in these areas have been shown, nor can it be guaranteed that all of them are mutually exclusive • It must also be noted that any of the contours shown can actually represent multiple (identical) coverages which have been superimposed

15. Problems • There is no obvious real solution that can be offered to solve this problem • The 'solution' of the 1987 HF conference • put everything into the plan even if it means zero coverage • is assumed to be unacceptable

16. Problems and solutions • As there is no single solution, we have to consider a series of small steps • We just have to hope that this series of small steps will lead to • 'a giant leap forwards'

17. Problems and solutions • As there is no single solution, we have to consider a series of small steps • We just have to hope that this series of small steps will lead to • 'a giant leap forwards' • It has to be more than just a hope • we need a high degree of certainty

18. Problems and solutions • As there is no single solution, we have to consider a series of small steps • We just have to hope that this series of small steps will lead to • 'a giant leap forwards' • It has to be more than just a hope • we need a high degree of certainty • This can only be achieved by building the steps on good engineering principles associated with good will on all sides

19. Solutions • None of the small steps is revolutionary • Some of them may need an alternative approach to be adopted by some administrations • this applies particularly to 'improvement' of input requirements • (None of the following pictures is intended to represent any real situations)

20. Overlapping assignments

21. Overlapping assignments • There are two potential sources of problem • the radiated powers may be too high in some cases • the large service areas may be difficult to protect • If the powers can be reduced, this is a good start • The area to be protected may be reduced by changing the requirement so that it consists of • an allotment to represent the area to be protected • an assignment to provide the coverage • these two requirements should be linked

22. Overlapping assignments • If there is only one assignment, it may be an advantage to submit the requirements as NOT forming an SFN • This is a special configuration,having the advantage that • the area of the allotment is regarded as receive only – it does not cause any additional interference • the assignment is regarded as transmit only – it does not increase size of the area to be protected

23. Overlapping allotments • When proposing allotments, there is a temptation to provide some extra coverage • just to be on the safe side

24. Overlapping allotments

25. Overlapping allotments • The main problem here is that there is increased difficulty in providing protection • The distance to any re-use of any of the channels is then increased • Perhaps the service areas can be re-defined so that there are no overlaps

26. Non-overlapping allotments

27. Different targets • Suppose that there are different coverage targets on each side of a national boundary • One country wants portable indoor reception • The other country wants fixed outdoor reception

28. Different targets

29. Different targets • The interference situation is not symmetrical • It may be difficult to reach agreements between the two administrations • Perhaps portable indoor reception is not needed throughout the entire allotment area • One solution is to try a linked allotment and assignment submitted as an SFN

30. Different targets

31. Errors • It is essential for administrations to check what the result of their submissions really is • There can be major surprises • Some errors in defining allotment boundaries have resulted in apparent demands for 20 or more channels for a set of coverages of the same area • This corresponds to more than 20 'layers' of coverage • This could apply even at VHF • There are many opportunities for errors

32. Analogue protection • In many cases there are no channels available for a digital requirement because of the need to protect an analogue assignment • There is no single solution • consider submitting the digital requirement as a 'conversion' • consider not protecting analogue • (declare that the digital requirement and the analogue assignment are compatible)

33. Other service protection • Sometimes there are no channels for a digital requirement because of the need to provide protection of an OS assignment • Consider the period for which the OS must remain in operation • perhaps this is so short that there will be no simultaneous operation • declare the digital requirement and the OS as compatible

34. Administrative declarations • These can provide a significant improvement in a plan • They must be used carefully • ensure that their use will not lead to a subsequent coverage loss

35. Administrative declarations • They must be submitted carefully • they have a unidirectional effect; take care that both directions of interference are considered • take care that all relevant pairs of requirements are dealt with • don't assume that linked requirements will be automatically taken into account

36. Administrative declarations • They must be submitted carefully • they have a unidirectional effect; take care that both directions of interference are considered • take care that all relevant pairs of requirements are dealt with • don't assume that linked requirements will be automatically taken into account • THEY WON'T BE