1 / 2

Effective Peer Feedback in Paper Revisions

This guide evaluates the quality of introductions in paper revisions, focusing on hook, problem statement, hypothesis, citations, relevance, and clarity. Ensure proper formatting and proofreading to create engaging and coherent introductions.

pandora-sullivan
Download Presentation

Effective Peer Feedback in Paper Revisions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Peer Feeback PACE Paper Revisions

  2. INTRODUCTION • Is their hook interesting and unique? • Did they state the problem? • Do they explain how their facts relate back to their experiment? • DO THEY HAVE IN-TEXT CITATIONS? IF NOT, WHERE CAN THEY ADD THEM? • Are in-text citations in the correct format? • Did they State the Hypothesis? (If, then, because) • When you read it, does it make sense? • Are there any obvious spelling, punctuation, etc. issues?

More Related