170 likes | 192 Views
3 rd Part I European Board Examination ORL-HNS. Angelos Nikolaou Greece. The first European ORL-Board Examination (written part, MCQ) 2009 June in Mannheim. Number of Candidates 79. The second European ORL-Board Examination (written part I) 2010 May Pamplona 52 Candidates.
E N D
3rd Part I European Board Examination ORL-HNS Angelos Nikolaou Greece
The first European ORL-Board Examination (written part, MCQ) 2009 June in Mannheim Number of Candidates 79
The second European ORL-Board Examination (written part I) 2010 May Pamplona 52 Candidates
The third European ORL-Board Examination (written part I) 2011 July Barcelona 122 Candidates
Countries of the Candidates Countries of the Candidates The first European ORL-Board Examination 2009 in Mannheim Number of Candidates 79
Results of the first European ORL-Board Examination (written part, MCQ) 2009 on June 29
Results Countries of the Candidates I The second European ORL-Board Examination (written part I, MCQ) 2010 May 29 during the ESPO 2010 Pamplona: 52 Candidates Countries of the Candidates II
OTHER COUNTRIES FROM WHERE CANDIDATES CAME FROM • Canada • Colombia • Iran • Mexico • Malaisia • Latvia • Jordan • And other
Percentage of European Candidates • 39 out of 122 • 32%
PERCENTAGE OF FAILED CANDIDATES IN EACH EXAM • 2009 14% • 2010 10% • 2011 16%
EVALUATION OF MCQs • Mannheim meetings • Computer software evaluation of results • Angoff procedure
Board responsible for the exam • CHAIRMAN AND COORDINATOR:Prof. Klaus Albegger.Otology. Austria VICE-CHAIRMAN:Prof. Angelos Nikolaou. Head and Neck and Otology. GreeceMEMBERS:Prof. Stanislaw Bien.Head and Neck. Poland • Prof. Thomas Eichhorn.GermanyADVISORY BOARD: • Prof. Karl HörmannUEMS-ORL Section and Board President. GermanyMr. Christopher MilfordUEMS-ORL Section and Board General Secretary. United KingdomProf. Francis MarchalUEMS-ORL Section and Board Treasurer. Switzerland
FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ORIGIN OF THE CANDIDATES • City/ Country where the exam is taking place • Financial level of the country where the candidate comes from • Usefulness of the diploma for the future of the candidate • How fair, easy and esteemed the diploma is, compared to similar others
HOW TO INCREASE THE MOTIVATION FOR PARTICIPATION OF MORE EUROPEAN CANDIDATES • Asking the national societies to persuade the committees responsible for doctors’ employment that EBE diploma is an important qualification • As a first step to achieve this goal is to officially accept the EBE diploma as equal to the national one • To standardize the level of the exam and to increase its reputation in order to become a well esteemed worldwide qualification (this needs time, continuous evaluation, effort and dedication)