INITIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT LIVING WITH HIV-- Part One

1. INITIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT LIVING WITH HIV--Part One

2. John W. Hogan, M.D. • Howard University College of Medicine Content Development and Training

3. Objectives • After completion of this module the participants will be able to: • Discuss the importance of monitoring the CD4 count and the Plasma HIV RNA. • Discuss when HIV-1 resistance testing is indicated. • Discuss the importance of HLA-B5701 testing and when testing is indicated.

4. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents • Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in Treatment-Naive Patients • (Last updated:2/12/2013; last reviewed:2/12/2013)

5. Initial Evaluation • Every patient living with HIV entering into care should have a: • complete medical history, • physical examination, and • laboratory evaluation. • Every patient should be counseled regarding the implications of HIV infection. • The goals of the initial evaluation are: • to confirm the diagnosis of HIV infection, • obtain appropriate baseline historical and laboratory data, • ensure patient understanding about HIV infection and its transmission, and • to initiate care as recommended in HIV primary care guidelines • and guidelines for prevention and treatment of HIV-associated opportunistic infections.

6. Initial Evaluation • The initial evaluation also should include introductory discussion on the benefits of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for the patient’s health and to prevent HIV transmission. • Newly diagnosed patients should also be asked about any prior use of ARV agents for prevention of HIV infection. • In the case of previously treated patients who present for an initial evaluation with a new health care provider, it is critical to obtain a complete antiretroviral (ARV) history (including drug resistance testing results, if available), preferably through the review of past medical records.

7. Laboratory Tests • The following laboratory tests performed during initial patient visits can be used to stage HIV disease and to assist in the selection of ARV drug regimens: • HIV antibody testing; • CD4 T-cell count (CD4 count); • Plasma HIV RNA (viral load); • Complete blood count, • Chemistry profile, transaminase levels, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine, urinalysis, • Serologies for hepatitis A, B, and C viruses; • Fasting blood glucose and serum lipids.

8. Laboratory Tests • Patients should be screened for sexually transmitted infections. • Test for G6PD deficiency if prophylaxis medications for PCP are needed. • Tests for determining the risk of opportunistic infections and need for prophylaxis should be performed as recommended in HIV primary care and opportunistic infections guidelines. • Toxoplasmosis • CMV • Genotypic resistance testing is performed at entry into care, regardless of whether ART will be initiated immediately. • For patients who have HIV RNA levels <500 to 1,000 copies/mL, resistance testing may not always be successful.

9. Psycho-Social Evaluation • The baseline evaluation should include an evaluation of the patient’s readiness for ART, including an assessment of: • high-risk behaviors, • substance abuse, • social support, • mental illness, • comorbidities, • economic factors (e.g., unstable housing), • medical insurance status and adequacy of coverage.

10. Psycho-Social Evaluation • Patients living with HIV infection often must cope with many social, psychiatric, and medical issues that are best addressed through a patient-centered, multi-disciplinary approach to the disease. • The baseline evaluation should also include a discussion of risk reduction and disclosure to sexual and/or needle sharing partners, especially with untreated patients who are still at high risk of HIV transmission. • Education about HIV risk behaviors and effective strategies to prevent HIV transmission should be provided at each patient visit.

11. Laboratory Tests • A number of laboratory tests are important for initial evaluation of patients living with HIV. • Laboratory test are performed: • upon entry into care, • during follow-up (if antiretroviral therapy (ART) has not been initiated), • before and after the initiation or modification of therapy to assess virologic and immunologic efficacy of ART and • to monitor for laboratory abnormalities that may be associated with antiretroviral (ARV) drugs.

12. Laboratory Tests • The CD4 T-cell count (CD4 count) serves as the major laboratory indicator of immune function in patients who have HIV infection. • It is one of the key factors in determining both the urgency of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation and the need for prophylaxis for opportunistic infections. • It is the strongest predictor of subsequent disease progression and survival according to findings from clinical trials and cohort studies. • CD4 counts are highly variable.

13. Laboratory Tests • All patients at entry into care should have a baseline CD4 count. • An adequate CD4 response for most patients on therapy is defined as an increase in CD4 count in the range of 50 to 150 cells/mm3 per year, generally with an accelerated response in the first 3 months of treatment. • Subsequent increases in patients with good virologic control average approximately 50 to 100 cells/mm3 per year until a steady state level is reached. • Patients who initiate therapy with a low CD4 count4 or at an older age may have a blunted increase in their counts despite virologic suppression.

14. Laboratory Tests • In untreated patients, CD4 counts should be monitored every 3 to 6 months to determine the urgency of ART initiation. • In patients on ART, the CD4 count is used to assess the immunologic response to ART and the need for initiation or discontinuation of prophylaxis for opportunistic infections. • The CD4 count response to ART varies widely, but a poor CD4 response is rarely an indication for modifying a virologically suppressive antiretroviral (ARV) regimen.

15. Laboratory Tests • In patients with consistently suppressed viral loads who have already experienced ART-related immune reconstitution, the CD4 cell count provides limited information, and frequent testing may cause unnecessary anxiety in patients with clinically inconsequential fluctuations. • In the patient on a suppressive regimen whose CD4 cell count has increased well above the threshold for opportunistic infection risk, the CD4 count can be measured less frequently than the viral load. • In such patients, CD4 count may be monitored every 6 to 12 months, unless there are changes in the patient’s clinical status.

16. Plasma HIV RNA Testing • Plasma HIV-1 RNA (viral load) should be measured in all HIV-1-infected patients at baseline and on a regular basis thereafter, especially in patients who are on treatment, because viral load is the most important indicator of response to antiretroviral therapy (ART). • Commercially available HIV-1 RNA assays do not detect HIV-2 viral load. • Analysis of 18 trials showed there is a significant association between a decrease in plasma viremia and improved clinical outcome. • The minimal change in viral load considered to be statistically significant (2 standard deviations) is a threefold, or a 0.5 log10 copies/mL change.

17. Plasma HIV RNA Testing • Optimal viral suppression is generally defined as a viral load persistently below the level of detection (<20 to 75 copies/mL, depending on the assay used). • Isolated blips (viral loads transiently detectable at low levels, typically <400 copies/mL) are not uncommon in successfully treated patients and are not thought to represent viral replication or to predict virologic failure. • Low-level positive viral load results (typically <200 copies/mL) appear to be more common with some viral load assays than with others.

18. Plasma HIV RNA Testing • Plasma viral load should be measured before initiation of therapy and preferably within 2 to 4 weeks, and not more than 8 weeks, after treatment initiation or after treatment modification. • Repeat viral load measurement should be performed at 4- to 8-week intervals until the level falls below the assay’s limit of detection. • For most individuals who are adherent to their antiretroviral (ARV) regimens viral suppression is generally achieved in 12 to 24 weeks. • Patients who fail to achieve viral suppression should undergo resistance testing to aid in the selection of an alternative regimen.

19. Plasma HIV RNA Testing • Viral load measurement should be performed within 2 to 8 weeks after changing therapy. • The purpose of viral load monitoring at this point is to confirm potency of the new regimen. • In patients on a stable ARV regimen. • Viral load should be repeated every 3 to 4 months or as clinically indicated. • Clinicians may extend the interval to every 6 months for adherent patients who have suppressed viral loads for more than 2 to 3 years and whose clinical and immunologic status is stable.

20. Drug-Resistance Testing • HIV drug-resistance testing is recommended in persons with HIV infection at entry into care regardless of whether antiretroviral therapy (ART) will be initiated immediately or deferred. • If therapy is deferred, repeat testing should be considered at the time of ART initiation. • Genotypic testing is recommended as the preferred resistance testing to guide therapy in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients. • If transmitted integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance is a concern, providers may wish to supplement standard genotypic resistance testing with an INSTI genotype test.

21. Drug-Resistance Testing • HIV drug-resistance testing should be performed to assist in the selection of active drugs when changing ARV regimens in persons with virologic failure and HIV RNA levels >1,000 copies/mL. • In persons with HIV RNA levels >500 but <1,000 copies/mL, testing may be unsuccessful but should still be considered. • Drug-resistance testing should also be performed when managing suboptimal viral load reduction. • In persons failing INSTI-based regimens, genotypic testing for INSTI resistance should be performed to determine whether to include a drug from this class in subsequent regimens. • Drug-resistance testing in the setting of virologic failure should be performed while the person is taking prescribed ARV drugs or, if not possible, within 4 weeks after discontinuing therapy.

22. Drug-Resistance Testing • Genotypic testing is recommended as the preferred resistance testing to guide therapy in patients with suboptimal virologic responses or virologic failure while on first or second regimens. • The addition of phenotypic to genotypic testing is generally preferred for persons with known or suspected complex drug-resistance mutation patterns, particularly to protease inhibitors (PIs). • Genotypic testing is recommended as the preferred resistance testing to guide therapy in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients.

23. Genotypic Assays • Genotypic assays detect drug-resistance mutations present in relevant viral genes. • Genotypic assays can be performed rapidly and results are available within 1 to 2 weeks of sample collection. • Interpretation of test results requires knowledge of the mutations selected by different antiretroviral (ARV) drugs and of the potential for cross resistance to other drugs conferred by certain mutations. • Clinicians are encouraged to consult a specialist to facilitate interpretation of genotypic test results and design of an optimal new regimen.

24. Phenotypic Assays • Phenotypic assays measure the ability of a virus to grow in different concentrations of ARV drugs. • Replication of viral clones at different drug concentrations is monitored and is compared with replication of a reference HIV strain. • The drug concentration that inhibits viral replication by 50% (i.e., the median inhibitory concentration [IC50]) is calculated, and the ratio of the IC50 of test and reference viruses is reported as the fold increase in IC50.

25. Phenotypic Assays • Automated phenotypic assays that can produce results in 2 to 3 weeks are commercially available, but they cost more to perform than genotypic assays. • Interpretation of phenotypic assay results is complicated by incomplete information regarding the specific resistance level (i.e., fold increase in IC50) that is associated with drug failure, although clinically significant fold increase cutoffs are now available for some drugs. • Consultation with a specialist to interpret test results can be helpful.

26. Use of Resistance Assays in Determining Initial Treatment • Transmission of drug-resistant HIV strains is well documented and associated with suboptimal virologic response to initial antiretroviral therapy (ART). • The likelihood that a patient will acquire drug-resistant virus is related to the prevalence of drug resistance in HIV-infected persons engaging in high-risk behaviors in the community. • In the United States and Europe, recent studies suggest that the risk that transmitted virus will be resistant to at least one ARV drug is in the range of 6% to 16%. • Up to 8%, but generally less than 5% of transmitted viruses will exhibit resistance to drugs from more than one class.

27. Use of Resistance Assays in the Event of Virologic Failure • Resistance assays are useful in guiding treatment decisions for patients who experience virologic failure while on ART. • Several prospective studies assessed the utility of resistance testing to guide ARV drug selection in patients with virologic failure. • Changes in therapy that were informed by resistance testing results produced better early virologic response to salvage regimens than regimen changes guided only by clinical judgment.

28. Use of Resistance Assays in the Event of Virologic Failure • Resistance testing also can help guide treatment decisions for patients with suboptimal viral load reduction. • Virologic failure in the setting of combination ART is, for certain patients, associated with resistance to only one component of the regimen. • In this situation, substituting individual drugs in a failing regimen may be a possible option, but this concept will require clinical validation.

29. Use of Resistance Assays in the Event of Virologic Failure • In patients who are on a failing first or second ARV drug regimen and experiencing virologic failure or suboptimal viral load reduction, genotypic testing is generally preferred for resistance testing. • Addition of phenotypic to genotypic testing is generally preferred for persons with known or suspected complex drug-resistance mutation patterns, particularly to PIs. • In patients failing INSTI-based regimens, testing for INSTI resistance should be performed to determine whether to include drugs from this class in subsequent regimens. • When the use of a CCR5 antagonist is being considered, a co-receptor tropism assay (Trofile) should be performed.

30. Use of Resistance Assays in Pregnancy • In pregnant women, the goal of ART is to maximally reduce plasma HIV RNA to provide optimal maternal therapy and to prevent perinatal transmission of HIV. • Genotypic resistance testing is recommended for all pregnant women before initiation of therapyand for those entering pregnancy with detectable HIV RNA levels while on therapy. • Optimal prevention of perinatal transmission may require initiation of ART pending resistance testing results. • Once the results are available, the ARV regimen can be changed as needed.

31. HLA-B* 5701 Screening • The Abacavir HSR is a multiorgan clinical syndrome typically seen within the initial 6 weeks of ABC treatment. • This reaction has been reported in 5%–8% of patients participating in clinical trials when using clinical criteria for the diagnosis, and it is the major reason for early discontinuation of ABC. • Discontinuing ABC usually promptly reverses HSR, whereas subsequent rechallenge can cause a rapid, severe, and even life-threatening recurrence. • Studies that evaluated demographic risk factors for ABC HSR have shown racial background as a risk factor, with white patients generally having a higher risk (5%–8%) than black patients (2%–3%).

32. HLA-B* 5701 Screening • Patients should be screened for HLA-B*5701 before starting patients on an ABC-containing regimen. • HLA-B*5701–positive patients should not be prescribed ABC, and the positive status should be recorded as an ABC allergy in the patient’s medical record. • HLA-B*5701 testing is needed only once in a patient’s lifetime. • HLA-B*5701 should not be used as a substitute for clinical judgment or pharmacovigilance, because a negative HLA-B*5701 result does not absolutely rule out the possibility of some form of ABC HSR. • When HLA-B*5701 screening is not readily available, it remains reasonable to initiate ABC with appropriate clinical counseling and monitoring for any signs of ABC HSR.

33. Summary • A wide variety of laboratory test are indicated in the initial evaluation of the patient living with HIV. • Monitoring both the CD4 cell count and the HIV RNA levels is essential. • Interpreting the results of resistance testing requires experience and expertise.

34. Case 1 • A 27 yo male dx in 08/12 returns for FU. His last labs were drawn 4 weeks ago. His CD4 count was 512 and His VL was 55,000. His Genotype done 08/12 showed the virus to be pan sensitive. He states his insurance is active and he wants to start ARV’s. • What would you do next?

35. Case 2 • A 31 yo woman was dx HIV+ at her prenatal visit last week by WB. She is G1, 32 wks pregnant by dates and has had no prior prenatal care. Her CD4 count is 875 and her VL is 488. No Genotype was ordered. • What is your next course of action and why?

36. Howard University HURB 1 1840 7th Street NW, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20001 202-865-8146 (Office) 202-667-1382 (Fax) www.capitolregiontelehealth.org www.aetcnmc.org