1 / 15

Methodology to Transition WSP2 Technologies

Aeronautical Systems Center. Methodology to Transition WSP2 Technologies. Birthplace, Home and Future of Aerospace. Charles R. Valley, Lead Emerging Technologies Team (ASC/ENVV) Jerad A. Ford (Battelle) Jim L. Tankersley (Battelle) Wednesday, April 27 th 2004

parker
Download Presentation

Methodology to Transition WSP2 Technologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Aeronautical Systems Center Methodology to Transition WSP2 Technologies Birthplace, Home and Future of Aerospace Charles R. Valley, Lead Emerging Technologies Team (ASC/ENVV) Jerad A. Ford (Battelle) Jim L. Tankersley (Battelle) Wednesday, April 27th 2004 NDIA 30th Environmental and Energy Symposium and Exhibition

  2. Introduction • Background • The ASC/ENVV team • Requirements/Needs Identification • Identifying and Ranking Technologies and Projects • Securing Funding! • Critical Success Factors

  3. History • NTP: 25 March 2002 • Initial Focus: Depot WS Technology transition

  4. GOCO History Started working GOCO projects May 2003

  5. “The Team” Major Frank Boaz, Chief ASC/ENVV Technology Investments C. Valley, Team Lead Project Execution ASC/ENVProject Managers GOCO/SPO Requirements F. Brown, Team Lead

  6. ETT Overview Mid-term BCA Regulations Project Development Project Execution andHQ Conduit Project Execution Tech Investment Portfolio Near-term Viable START Regulatory Review (drivers) ID, Rank & Document Projects Mid-Long term ESTCP PEWG (Outyear POM) ENVV Review YES Long Term R&D SERDP • Drivers Identified • Timelines determined • PPPNs produced • Contractor support defined INPUTS: • ALCs, GOCOs, SPOs • AF Industrial Complex (OEMs) • External Resources • Joint Service Activity NO Not Viable Drop from consideration Identify Drivers Integrate weapon system req’s with viable technologies Programming Execution/Insertion

  7. Requirements Identification • Examine all available requirements data • AF EDP database – warehouse of environmental technology needs AF-wide • Regulatory driver assessment • Other gathered requirements; GOCO and SPO needs, OC-ALC, WR-ALC and OO-ALC requirements, AFRL/ML Roadmap, OSD ESOH needs • Examine Existing/Planned Projects for cross feed and/or continuation • JG-PP, JCAT, HCAT, NCMS/CTMA, JTEG, ESTCP, SERDP, AFRL techs etc.

  8. AFRL/ML ROADMAPS

  9. Environmental Development Planning https://xre22.brooks.af.mil

  10. Identify technologies • Pool knowledge close at hand: • National Laboratories • ORNL, PNNL, BNL, etc. managed or co-managed by Battelle • NDCEE ongoing activities • CTC/Battelle/Booz Allen Hamilton • Solicit OEMs for White Papers • Lockheed-Martin, Boeing, 3M, many more • Dedicated Technical Research Contractor Staff

  11. Ranking GOCO, SPO, ALC identified techs High priority customer requirements + Matching Techs Technological Maturity Assessment Economics – Business Case Analysis Insertion Point Analysis Cust. ID’d Techs Needs and Requirements Matching Technologies Technology Investment Portfolio

  12. Funding • Ultimate criteria for P2 determined by funding authority

  13. Funding Continued

  14. AFMC WSP2 funding

  15. Critical Success Factors • Think outside the P2 box • Think Mission Readiness, Cost Savings are paramount these days • Requirements Identification • Calibrate outyear program and coordination efforts overall roadmaps and strategic plans • Share and review requirements information from all sources • Establish integrating planning: • R&D to Qualification coordinate information flow between R&D activities (AFRL to ASC) • Project Development • Focus on establishing Technological maturity • Solid economics • Project Execution • Utilize contractor/OEM support for implementation on case by case basis

More Related