210 likes | 338 Views
III Convegno Congiunto delle Società Lombarda e Triveneta di Chirurgia La carcinosi peritoneale da ca colorettale. Storia naturale, scenari clinici ed impatto prognostico D.Foschi Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche L.Sacco Università di Milano Desenzano 12 maggio 2012.
E N D
III Convegno Congiunto delle Società Lombarda e Triveneta di Chirurgia La carcinosi peritoneale da ca colorettale. Storia naturale, scenari clinici ed impatto prognostico D.Foschi Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche L.Sacco Università di Milano Desenzano 12 maggio 2012
Pathogenesis of peritoneal minimal residual disease D WP Ceelen, 2009
Disease progression and metastatic spread K.L. Sodek, 2012
Incidence of synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis Author N. Patients P.C. Russell (1984) 94 5 % Minsky (1988) 294 4 % Jayne (2002) 2756 7.7 % Lemmens (2010)* 18.738 4.8 % Mulsow (2011) 3138 4.8 %
Synchronous Peritoneal Carcinomatosis and Colorectal cancer 4.8% 43.6% 56.4% Anni 1995-2008 W.E. Lemmens, Int J Cancer, 2011
General characteristics of patients with synchronous P.C. 0.1% 0.3% 3.4% 21% W.E. Lemmens, Int J Cancer, 2011
Risk of P.C. : Multivariable logistic regression W.E. Lemmens, Int J Cancer, 2011
Meta-analysis of overall and local recurrence for – vs + preresection PFCC Rekhraj S,2008
Meta-analysis of overall and local recurrence for – vs + postresection PFCC Rekhraj S,2008
Prognostic factors in metachronous ascites M:6 mnt DZJ Chu, Cancer, 1989
Crude survival of synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis V.E. Lemmens,2010
Incidence of metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis Author year N.Patients Met.P.C. Cass 1976 280 28% Malcom 1981 285 13% Mendenhall 1983 140 12% Gilbert 1984 31 3% Tong 1984 64 44% Gunderson 1985 91 21% Jayne 2002 2756 4.8% ________________________________________________ Gilbert(autopsy ser.) 1984 45 40% Russell (autopsy ser.) 1985 53 36% ________________________________________________ Mulsow (CRC-PC) 2011 31 74% Matsuda (CRC-PC) 2012 31 77%
Logistic regression analysis for metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis Odds ratio P Clinical Liver metastasis 2.84 (1.7 – 4.6) <0.001 Histological Tumor stage 2.74(1.6-4.5) <0.001 Nodal stage 2.47(1.6-3.8) <0.001 Venous invasion 2.07(1.1-2.3) <0.012 Perineural invasion 1.57(1-2.3) <0.032 Jayne DG, 2002
Risk factors for metachronous P.C. pT4 Positive peritoneal cytology Peritoneal seeding Ovarian Involvement Perforation of the tumor Rupture of a necrotic tumor mass Intraoperative tumor spill
Risk factors for metachronous P.C. N.Patients Synchronous P.C. Ovarian Metastase Perforated tumor Tot n:41 n:25 n: 8 n:8 % + P.C. 15(60%) 5 (62%) 3 (37%) PCI 9±6 7±5 5±2 D. Elias, 2011
Risk of local recurrence after inadvertent rectal perforation M.T. Eriksen, 2004
Risk of metachronous carcinomatosis after CRC-PC resection Synchronouscolorectal PC N:153 Non complete resection N:122 Complete resection N:31 Allrecurrences N:24 (77%) 1° site of recurrence Intra-peritoneal alone N. 8 (25.8%) P.C. – extraperitoneal N:1 (3.2%) Extra-peritoneal alone N:15 (48.4%) Matsuda, 2012
Pathophysiology of ascites accumulation ROS MIF TGF-α bFGF TGF-β TNF-α IL-1, -6, -8, -10 K.L. Sodek, 2012