290 likes | 452 Views
Group 3: Seong Won Byun Jakob Combs Zachary Lightner Bart Sudhoff Devin Templeton. Lawn Sprinkler design. Objective. Provide 1 inch of water to an area of 13,460ft 2 in the shortest time Least amount of water falling outside the property Minimize cost of materials
E N D
Group 3: Seong Won Byun Jakob Combs Zachary Lightner Bart Sudhoff Devin Templeton Lawn Sprinkler design
Objective • Provide 1 inch of water to an area of 13,460ft2 in the shortest time • Least amount of water falling outside the property • Minimize cost of materials • Minimize electric utility costs
Layout • Large area used 30-foot radius sprinkler heads • Smaller areas used combination of 18 and 17-foot radius sprinkler heads
Layout • Sprinkler head locations • Circles are 30-foot radius • Outside corners are 270° rotors • Corners and boundary edges are 90° and 180° rotors • All others are 360° rotors
Pipe Layout & AFT Model Pipe Layout for Zone 1 Pipe Layout for Zone 2 Pipe Layout for Zone 3 Sprinkler GPM for Zone 1 Sprinkler GPM for Zone 2 Sprinkler GPM for Zone 3
Sprinkler Parameters • Pressure difference across the component is [Equation 1] • The k-loss value is [Equation 2]
Project Results Table 2: Required Flow Rate and Time to Water for Each Zone 13460 8390 192.5
Cost Analysis • Largest cost in the project is the rotor sprinkler heads. • Another major factor for cost is the diameter of pipe.
Summary Project Outcomes: • 56 Sprinkler Heads • Total Material Cost: $1154 • 192 Minutes to Water
References [1] Toksoy, John M., “Sprinkler Project Description”, Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation. Fall 2007. [2] Smajstrla, A.G., Zazueta, F.S. and Haman, D.Z., “Lawn Sprinkler Selection”, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/AE084. Accessed on November 2, 2007. [3] Hunter Industries, “I10/I20 Ultra Rotary Sprinklers”, http://www.hunterindustries.com/Products/Rotors/i20intro.html. Accessed on November 12, 2007. [4] Stryker, Jess. “Irrigation Tutorials”. http://irrigationtutorials.com. Accessed on November 12, 2007. [5] Sprinkler Warehouse. http://www.sprinklerwarehouse.com/Default.asp?Redirected=Y. Accessed on November 12, 2007. [6] US Plastics. http://www.usplastic.com/catalog/default.asp?cookie%5Ftest=1. Accessed on November 12, 2007. [7] McMaster-Carr. http://www.mcmaster.com. Accessed on November 12, 2007.
Updates to MATLAB Program • Removed calculations from HE_Design_Input • Tube ID, Tube Pitch, Number of Tubes • Number of tubes when running DOE file • Added Nusselt correlations for both shell and tube side • Added more materials • Entire program can be run from HE_Design_Main
Reduction of Variables Eliminate: Tube OD Shell ID Tube Thickness Lowest Weight Configuration Possible
Manual Optimization Results FINAL RESULTS
Heat Transfer Coefficients * Gnielinski for Turbulent Flow, 2300 < Re < 5x106 * JP Holman, “Heat Transfer” 2002, For Turbulent Flow: C=0.386, n=0.592 * Toksoy, “Convection Heat Transfer” TFD-HE2, pg. 9
Tube Thickness Calculate maximum allowable pressure:
Final Input Parameters * Correlations added by design group