1 / 45

Research Methods in Crime and Justice

Research Methods in Crime and Justice. Chapter 6 Measurement. Measurement. Measurement is the process by which social science researchers determine how to assess the social phenomena they study.

patch
Download Presentation

Research Methods in Crime and Justice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 6 Measurement

  2. Measurement • Measurement is the process by which social science researchers determine how to assess the social phenomena they study. • Measurement in social science research is more difficult than in physical science research because social concepts and phenomena are more challenging to define.

  3. Conceptualization • The measurement process begins with conceptualization. • Conceptualization is the process by which researchers develop precise definitions of the concepts they study.

  4. Operationalization • Operationalization begins after the concepts have been defined. • Operationalization is the process by which a researcher decides how to actually measure the variables as they are defined conceptually.

  5. Levels of Measurement • A variable is anything that varies. • Race or ethnicity • Height • Income • All variables have attributes. • Attributes are the levels or variations of a variable. • The variable ‘gender’ has two attributes – ‘male’ and ‘female’. • Variables are discussed in more detail in Chapter 7.

  6. Levels of Measurement • The level at which a variable is measured has important implications. • Generally speaking, higher levels of measurement are more precise. • The level at which we measure variables determines how we analyze the data that we collect during our research.

  7. Levels of Measurement • There are four levels of measurement. • Nominal • Ordinal • Interval • Ratio

  8. Nominal • The lowest level of measurement • Nominal level variables are merely names or labels. • The attributes (i.e. the categories) of nominal level variables cannot be arranged in any logical order or sequence. • Examples: Race, ethnicity, gender

  9. Ordinal • Like nominal level variables, ordinal level variables are also names or labels. • In addition, the attributes of an ordinal level variable can be rank ordered, or arranged in a logical order. • Examples: Race results – first place, second place, and third place winners.

  10. Interval • Like nominal level variables, interval level variables can be names or labels. • Like ordinal level variables, the attributes of an interval level variable can be rank ordered, or arranged in a logical order. • In addition, the distances between the attributes of an interval level variable are equal. • Examples: height, weight, age

  11. Ratio • Like nominal level variables, ratio level variables can be names or labels. • Like ordinal level variables, the attributes of a ratio level variable can be rank ordered, or arranged in a logical order. • Like interval level variables the distances between the attributes of a ratio level variable are equal. • In addition, ratio level variables include an absolute zero. • Examples: income, temperature

  12. Levels of Measurement

  13. Levels of Measurement • It is possible to convert a variable originally measured at a higher level of measurement into a variable measured at a lower level of measurement. • It is not possible to convert a variable originally measured at a lower level of measurement into a variable measured at a higher level of measurement.

  14. Levels of Measurement • An alternative method for classifying the levels of measurement. • Discrete variables • similar to nominal and ordinal level measures. • Fixed number of attributes • Continuous variables • Similar to interval or ratio level variables. • Almost unlimited number of attributes.

  15. Validity and Reliability • Social scientists evaluate the quality of their measures based on their validity and reliability. • Validity refers to the ability of a measure to accurately measure the concept it claims to measure. • Reliability refers to the ability of a measure to consistently measure the concept it claims to measure.

  16. Validity • There are four commonly used methods for assessing the validity (accuracy) of a measure. • Face validity • Criterion or predictive validity • Construct validity • Content validity

  17. Face Validity • Refers to whether a measure appears to be valid on its face, or whether it makes sense. • For example, if we measure a person’s lifetime level of criminal behavior using only their adult criminal convictions, our measure would not have face validity because it excludes juvenile criminal convictions.

  18. Criterion or Predictive Validity • Refers to the extent to which a measure relates to another, more direct measure of the same concept. • For example, we might ask someone whether they have been arrested for a crime and test the criterion validity of this measure by comparing their answers to official arrest records.

  19. Construct Validity • Refers to the extent to which a measure corresponds to other variables that are related to the underlying variable we are interested in studying. • For example, there appears to be a relationship between creditworthiness and criminal behavior. • So, one might ask if a credit score has construct validity with criminal behavior.

  20. Content Validity • Refers to the degree to which a measure includes every dimension of the concept. • For example, individuals with strong social bonds (marriage, parenthood and friendships) are less likely to commit crime • So, if we wanted to ensure that our measure of social bonds has content validity, we would have to include all of these dimensions, and maybe more.

  21. Reliability • There are four commonly used methods for assessing the reliability (consistency) of a measure. • Test-Retest • Inter-rater • Split half • Concurrent (benchmarks/baselines

  22. Test-Retest • The test-retest method requires a researcher to administer a measure twice to the same group to see of the results are similar. • The measure is considered reliable if the results from each test administration are similar.

  23. Inter-rater • To use the inter-rater method a researcher would ask two or more researchers to observe and measure the same thing. • Then the researcher would compare the results to see if they generally have the same impression of what they observed. • If so, then the measure is considered reliable.

  24. Split half • The split half reliability method requires a researcher to split a measure in half (or develop a similar measure) and administer each half to two similar groups. • The measure is considered reliable if the results from each half are similar.

  25. Concurrent(Benchmarks/Baselines) • The reliability of a new measure can be assessed with pre-existing benchmarks and baselines. • Often called concurrent reliability. • This simply means that the results from a new measure concur with the results from a pre-established and generally accepted measure of the same concept.

  26. Indexes, Scales and Typologies • Indexes, scales and typologies enable researchers to collect detailed information about complicated social phenomena within a single measure. • These measurement devices are a great way of summarizing a lot of information into a single number.

  27. Index • An index is a single number that represents a compilation of other measures. • The most common index used in criminal justice is the Crime Index calculated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. • The FBI uses eight crime categories to calculate an overall rate of crime for each community, state, region and the nation.

  28. Scale • A scale is a method for quantitatively measuring a single phenomenon or variable. • The most common types of scales are Likert scales, usually consisting of five points. • Strongly disagree • Disagree • Neither agree nor disagree • Agree • Strongly disagree

  29. Typology • A typology is a method for classifying observations, people or situations into nominal categories. • Typologies are often used in qualitative research.

  30. Quantitative vs. Qualitative • Quantitative measures are more common in criminal justice research. • There is a large and growing body of research that is qualitative in nature. • Some researchers erroneously assume that qualitative measures are less precise than quantitative measures. • This is probably because qualitative measures do not involve numbers.

  31. Quantitative vs. Qualitative • But it is possible that the opposite is true. • Because they do not rely on numbers, qualitative measures are more difficult to operationalize. • This often forces qualitative researchers to be more precise and develop a deeper understanding of the phenomenon.

  32. Getting to the Point • Measurement is a process by which social science researchers determine how to assess the social phenomena they study. • Conceptualization is the process by which researchers develop precise definitions for vague concepts. • Operationalization is the process by which researchers decide how to measure the variables as they are defined conceptually.

  33. Getting to the Point • The level at which a variable is measured has important implications. Generally speaking, higher levels of measurement provide more detailed information and allow for more precise analytical techniques.

  34. Getting to the Point • In the social sciences there are four levels of measurement: nominal, ordinal, interval and ratio.

  35. Getting to the Point • Nominal level variables are merely names or categories. • The attributes of nominally measured variables cannot be arranged in any logical order or sequence.

  36. Getting to the Point • Ordinal level variables are also names. • In addition the attributes of an ordinal level variable can be ordered in a logical sequence.

  37. Getting to the Point • The attributes of interval level variables can also be arranged in a logical order. • In addition, interval level variables have equal differences between their attributes.

  38. Getting to the Point • Ratio level variables have the same characteristics as interval level variables. • In addition, the attributes of ratio level variables include an absolute zero.

  39. Getting to the Point • It is possible to convert a variable measured at a higher level of measurement into a variable measured at a lower level of measurement. • It is not possible to convert a variable measured at a lower level of measurement into a variable measured at a higher level of measurement.

  40. Getting to the Point • Social scientists rely on the concepts of validity and reliability in order to improve the quality of their measures.

  41. Getting to the Point • Validity refers to the ability of a measure to accurately measure the concept it claims to measure. • There are four commonly used methods for assessing the validity (accuracy) of a measure. • Face validity • Criterion or predictive validity • Construct validity • Content validity

  42. Getting to the Point • Reliability refers to the ability of a measure to consistently measure the concept it claims to measure. • There are four commonly used methods for assessing the reliability (consistency) of a measure. • Test-Retest • Inter-rater • Split half • Concurrent (benchmarks/baselines)

  43. Getting to the Point • An index is a measurement device that compiles various measures into a single number. • A scale is a method for quantitatively measuring a single phenomenon or variable using a rating system. • A typology is a method for classifying observations, people or situations into nominal categories

  44. Getting to the Point • Quantitative measures rely on numbers. • Qualitative measures rely on descriptions to measure social phenomena. • Often both are necessary to fully understand a concept.

  45. Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 6 Measurement

More Related