1 / 24

Improving Chronic Illness Care: Development of Routine Patient Self-Assessment

Overview. Chronic illnessinformatics to improve careCHIACC project (HSR

paul2
Download Presentation

Improving Chronic Illness Care: Development of Routine Patient Self-Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Improving Chronic Illness Care: Development of Routine Patient Self-Assessment Alexander S. Young, MD, MSHS VA Desert Pacific MIRECC UCLA

    2. Overview Chronic illness informatics to improve care CHIACC project (HSR&D / QUERI) Improving mental health care challenges Developing patient self-assessment

    3. Chronic Illness Hypertension, diabetes, asthma, drug abuse, depression, schizophrenia, etc. Common 100 million have 1 or more Not well treated people in care receive 56% of effective treatments “Tyranny of the urgent” (Wagner) brief treatment visits patients not educated and supported Little oversight regarding the quality of care

    4. Improving Care Requires coordinated, proactive care system focused on acute care Chronic disease care models collaborative, team-based support patient self-management Goals improve care quality reduce morbidity and mortality

    5. EMR: Transformation of the VA

    7. Challenges in Chronic Illness Care EMR has limited data EMR data not well organized relevant data during the clinical encounter decision support Guidelines rarely used Communication is difficult among clinical team with patient

    8. How Can IT Help? Support collection of standard data Organize data decision support for clinicians Facilitate communication Manage care of populations support reorganization of care Support illness self-management

    9. CHIACC Funded by VA HSR&D and QUERI Clarify informatics approaches that help improve chronic illness care Develop and evaluate software in mental health high in usability interfaces with VA EMR

    10. Creating HealtheVet Informatics Applications for Collaborative Care (CHIACC): The Team Oregon Health & Science University David Dorr, MD, MS Funded by HSRD and QUERIFunded by HSRD and QUERI

    11. CHIACC Methods Phase 1a: Literature review Phase 1b: Achieve expert consensus on informatics support requirements for chronic illness care Phase 2: Design and test software modules Phase 3: Develop software and conduct usability evaluation

    12. CHIACC Results To be discussed

    13. Serious, Persistent Mental Illness Common & disabling prevalence of 3% - 5% Effective treatments exist medication, psychotherapies, rehabilitation Low use of appropriate care chronic depression: only 1/3 get medication or psychotherapy schizophrenia: many do not receive vocational rehabilitation, family services, clozapine, or side-effect management interventions

    14. Improving Care Nationally President’s New Freedom Commission VHA Mental Health Strategic Plan How to implement effective treatments? Major challenge: lack of routine, valid outcomes data no important lab tests or vital signs chart notes lack reliable clinical data not possible to know who needs each treatment & whether they improve very different problem from diabetes, hyperlipidemia, HTN, etc.

    15. Routine Outcomes Data to Inform Quality Improvement Potential solutions assessment by physicians or nurses assessment by trained staff self-assessment by patients Research questions 1) is self-assessment accurate 2) is routine self-assessment feasible and useful at typical mental health clinics

    16. Routine Outcomes Data: Self-Assessment by Patients Patient Assessment System (PAS) audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) touch-screen computer “kiosk” web browser www.npistat.com/pasdemo/ or 10.180.1.76/pasdemo/ (username and password are “guest”)

    17. Psychometric Study: Methods Convenience sample patients with schizophrenia or bipolar (n=90) Clinical research survey BASIS-R, side-effects, QOL face-to-face vs. ACASI 20 minutes apart separated by distracter task order was counter-balanced Usability survey comprehension, speed of completion, preferences

    18. Results Internal consistency: same between modes Concurrent validity high test-retest reliability between modes: r = .81 - .99 no bias across mode (adjusted for order) Usability no difference in speed: 15 minutes perfectly answered questions about how to use it: 97% easier to take? 86% ACASI like it more? 87% ACASI if required to take every month? 84% ACASI more private? 60% ACASI

    20. Conclusions Routine computerized self-assessment in chronic mental illness reliable & valid easy to implement well received by patients clinician acceptance varies substantially Improve care needs to be integrated with improved service delivery Use with other cognitive disorders?

    21. Future Directions Clinical research community-based practice research networks Services research support quality improvement in mental health VA healthcare integrate with VA data systems / Mental Health Assistant My HealtheVet

    23. References Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K: Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002; 288: 1775-9. Chinman M, Young AS, Schell T, Hassell J, Mintz J: Computer-assisted self-assessment in persons with severe mental illness. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2004; 65: 1343-1351. Cradock J, Young AS, Sullivan G: The accuracy of medical record documentation in schizophrenia. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2001; 28: 456-65 Dorr D, Bonner LM, Cohen AN, Shoai RS, Perrin R, Chaney E, Young AS: Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: A literature review. under review. Institute of Medicine: Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System. National Academies Press, Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. Young AS, Sullivan G, Burnam MA, Brook RH: Measuring the quality of outpatient treatment for schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1998; 55: 611-7

    24. References Young AS, Mintz J, Cohen AN: Clinical computing: using information systems to improve care for persons with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services 2004; 55:253-5 Young AS, Mintz J, Cohen AN, Chinman MJ: A network-based system to improve care for schizophrenia: the medical informatics network tool (MINT). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11: 358-67. Young AS, Mintz J, Chinman M: The Patient Assessment System (PAS). Demonstration available at www.npistat.com/pasdemo (username and password are “guest”). Young AS, Magnabosco JL: Services for adults with mental illness. In: Levin BL, Petrila J, Hennessy KD, eds. Mental Health Services: A Public Health Perspective. New York NY: Oxford University Press; 2004:177-208. Young AS, Cohen AN, Mintz J: A vignette in the chapter on information systems. In: The Institute of Medicine, eds. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2005:241-242.

    25. Acknowledgements VA HSR&D and QUERI (RCD 00-033, CPI 99-383, MHS 03-218) VA Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Program (MIRECC) NIMH UCLA-RAND Center for Research on Quality in Managed Care For further information Alexander S. Young, MD MSHS MIRECC, West Los Angeles VA Healthcare Center, 11301 Wilshire Blvd. (210A), Los Angeles CA 90073

More Related