E N D
1. Modeling the US Natural Gas Network James Ellison
Sandia National Laboratories
Critical Infrastructures Modeling and Simulation Group
3. US Natural Gas Network
12. Model Caveats Model does not take into account commercial contracts
May therefore give a false sense of security (even in an emergency, may not be able to override contracts in place)
Model does not take into account ownership of natural gas in storage
Assumption that gas could be drawn out of storage in an emergency may not be accurate
13. Conclusions Resilience of the modeled system to transmission disruption scenarios suggests US natural gas network robust
Weakness of the infrastructure is that it is a closed system – significant supply disruptions cannot be compensated for by increased imports
Large swings in natural gas pricing due to supply disruptions are therefore likely