360 likes | 1.15k Views
Damato Campimeter. More precise, accurate and reliable test withbetter examiner controlPortableOnly measures central visual field. A: test cardB: Side armC: Eye coverD: Test GridE: Stimulus windowF: Target stimulusG: Target arm and finger notches on the arm and card. Component Parts of the Campimeter.
E N D
1. VFD Lecture Part 3
2. Damato Campimeter More precise, accurate
and reliable test with
better examiner control
Portable
Only measures central
visual field
4. Test Procedure Test materials
Damato Campimeter
Test form
Book stand (optional)
Eye patch or clip on occluder (optional)
Environment
Well lighted room; light behind the patient and evenly illuminating the board
Room must be free from distractions
5. Test Instructions Patient seated comfortably at a table with eyeglasses on if needed to see board
Instruct patient to hold the board upright on the table top unless a book stand is being used
EX is positioned in front of the patient so that the patient’s eyes can be observed
Instruct the patient to cover the eye using the eye cover folded inward (an eye patch can be used instead)
Make sure there are no shadows on the board and that the patient’s head is centered (not tilted sideways)
9. Modifications for Non Compliant Patients The number can be highlighted to help maintain the patient’s attention/fixation
The number of test items can be reduced from 30 to 15 for patients with limited attention and endurance
The patient can raise a finger or point to the target instead of giving a verbal response
The test can be broken down into short segments and given over several days
10. Scoring
11. Additional Assessments
12. Oculomotor Changes Can be used to help confirm other observations
Patient is asked to gaze shift between targets
Patient often demonstrates searching saccade towards a target on the blind side
Makes several saccades toward the target instead of one smooth saccade
But makes a normal long smooth saccade towards the intact side
13. Insight into Visual Field Loss Patient must have good insight in order to apply compensatory strategies
Patient often misunderstands diagnosis
Believes the deficit is in one eye only
Believes the deficit only affects peripheral field
Believes the deficit is in the eye not the brain
Patient is unable to describe strategies used to compensate for loss
14. Insight Can be Measured With a Simple Scale 5 Demonstrates thorough understanding of
VFD; understands that deficit is in both eyes and knows which side has been affected; can describe how deficit has affected functional performance and safety; able to verbalize strategy needed to compensate and consistently employs strategy
4 Demonstrates understanding of VFD, understands that deficit is in both eyes and knows which side has been affected by deficit; can describe how deficit affects function and safety; able to verbalize strategy needed to compensate but does not consistently employ strategy
15. Insight rating … 3 demonstrates understanding of cause of VFD and which side has been affected by deficit; minimizes affect of deficit on functional performance and safety and/or does not fully understand how deficit affects function and safety; able to verbalize strategy needed to compensate but does not employ strategy
2 realizes deficit is present; knows which side is affected; may not realize deficit is in both eyes; not able to verbalize a compensatory strategy and/or cannot describe how deficit affects function and safety
1 may be aware that vision has changed but is unaware of the visual field deficit
16. Assessment of Influence of VFD on Visual Search Observational assessment
Questions to be answered
Does the VFD disrupt visual search?
How is the search pattern disrupted?
Does the patient initiate a compensatory strategy?
Assess two areas
Search in central visual field
Search in peripheral visual field
17. Visual Search Capability in the Central Visual Field Observe performance on cancellation tasks
Visual search subtests of Brain Injury Visual Assessment Battery for Adults (biVABA)
18. Normal Visual Search Persons without visual impairment demonstrate specific characteristics of search patterns that make them effective in locating and identifying targets
Linear strategy
Left to right and top to bottom
Symmetrical search pattern
Predictable search pattern
Thorough and comprehensive
Resilient
Consistent accuracy
19. Four Normal Search Patterns
20. Characteristics of Ineffective Search Patterns Abbreviated and incomplete
Asymmetrical
Initiated and confined to right side
Random-no predictable pattern
Inconsistent accuracy in target identification
Breaks down when challenged
21. Evaluating Search Effectiveness Best evaluated by observing patient complete a search task
Identify strengths and weaknesses of the search pattern
Note accuracy
Note time needed to complete search
22. Observation of the Pattern __Symmetrical horizontal left to right
__Symmetrical horizontal rectilinear
__Symmetrical vertical left to right
__Symmetrical vertical rectilinear
__Checks work for accuracy
__Abbreviated
__ right side __ left side
__Asymmetrical, right to left pattern
__Random, no predictable pattern
23. Cuing Should be part of the evaluation
Physical
Verbal
Helps determine strengths and weaknesses
A necessary component of treatment planning
Example of documentation
__ verbal cue given___benefits___no benefit
__ physical cue give ___benefits___no benefit
24. Ineffective Search Strategies Used by Persons with VFD Abbreviated Search Abbreviates search towards blind side due to oculomotor disruption
Results in omissions on the blind side
Search pattern is organized
Person checks work for errors
Search is often time consuming
Person maintains attention throughout test
26. Visual Search Capability in the Peripheral Visual Field Search of extrapersonal environment is often affected the most
To compensate for VFD, the patient must initiate a quick, efficient search of the blind side
Assessment determines whether patient demonstrates the essential components of a successful compensatory search strategy
27. Dynavision 2000
30. Dynavision Performance
31. If you don’t have a Dynavision… Get one
At $7,000 falls into the expensive range making it difficult to get one through standard budget procedures
Look instead for a donor
Hospital auxiliary
Foundation supporting the hospital
Sorority or service club
Not that difficult as it represents a one time purchase of a unique piece of equipment that is “plaque-able” ( you can put a nice bronze donation plaque on it)
Cheap man’s dynavision
Laser pointer-aim it at a white wall and have patient locate the red dot
32. Scan Course Assesses integration of visual search with ambulation
Observe whether patient is willing to scan the environment during ambulation or uses the maladaptive strategy of fixating on the floor or staring straight ahead
Can be set up anywhere
Home or clinic
34. Scan Course Performance If the patient is unable to combine visual search with ambulation, h/she will miss letter targets on the blind side
The patient should always be given feedback on performance and then asked to repeat the test going the opposite direction
If performance improves on second attempt it indicates that the patient is able to benefit from feedback to improve compensation
35. Supplement Evaluation with Observation of Behavior in Dynamic Environments Hesitant, uncomfortable and anxious
Uses trailing or attempts to follow you
Comes very close to obstacles on blind side
Uncertain in responding to subtle features (curbs, support surface changes)
Stopping to search-unable to combine visual search with ambulation
Appears or complains of disorientation