270 likes | 582 Views
E N D
1. FISS (Fast Imaging Solar Spectrograph) for NST (New Solar Telescope) at Big Bear
2. Contents
3. Introduction New Solar Telescope at Big Bear Solar Observatory (NJIT)
1.6 m off-axis telescope with f-ratio 52
High-order adaptive optics
Stable solar images with diffraction-limited resolution
: 0.07” at 500 nm and 0.15” at 1000 nm
4. Introduction Optical Layout of NST
5. Introduction New Solar Telescope at Big Bear Solar Observatory
Two major scientific Instruments
: Visible light imaging vector magnetograph (VIM)
: Infrared imaging vector magnetograph (IRIM)
<= based on Fabry-Perot filters
<= ideal for photospheric lines which are narrow and shifted only by a small amount
: However, they are not suited for chromospheric lines such as Ha and He I lines
which may be either very broad or may be highly shifted.
Instrument for the study of chromospheric phenomena
=> Fast Imaging Solar Spectrograph (FISS)
: Chromospheric features
- Filaments/ prominences
- Flares
- Jet-like features ( spicules, mottles, surges, upflow events, and so on )
6. FISS for Filament Threads High spatial resolution < 0.2”
High spectral resolution & mlti-line covergae
High temporal resolution
7. Concept & Data requirement of the FISS
Basic design concept of the FISS
Full-reflecting Echelle spectrograph of Littrow type
Recording two spectral bands at Ha and Ca II IR simultaneously
Fast imaging based on fast scan and fast CCD Cameras
:It operates either in spectrograph mode or in imaging mode
with fast scan at the sacrifice of spectral resolution.
8. Concept & Data requirement of the FISS Basic Design Parameters of FISS
9. Optical Design and Tolerance Analysis of the FISS Optical Design of FISS
10. Optical Design and Tolerance Analysis of the FISS Optical Performance of FISS
11. Optical Design and Tolerance Analysis of the FISS Tolerance Analysis of FISS
Tolerance analysis process <= iterative process
Specifying the tolerance : fabrication & align errors
Sensitivity analysis
Estimating overall performance
Tolerance Error Range for Sensitivity Analysis
12. Optical Design and Tolerance Analysis of the FISS Sensitivity Analysis
: Performance criterion - image RMS spot size (mm)
13. Optical Design and Tolerance Analysis of the FISS Inverse Sensitivity Analysis
14. Optical Design and Tolerance Analysis of the FISS Sensitivity Analysis : Performance criterion - image RMS spot size
:Compensator : thickness surf 21
15. Slit spectroscopy
16. Scanning tip-tilt mirror At the pupil, all the chief rays coincide.
Regardless of scanner’s tilt, chief rays are located at the same point on the mirror.
A field scan of 0.1” corresponds to a mirror tilt of 1/1000°(3.6”).
17. Scanner in absence of a pupil NST will include adaptive optics; this does not guarantee the existence of a pupil.
NST may give a collimated beam.
Two solutions
Add some lenses to make a pupil ?inefficient
Develop a pupilless scanner
18. The MISC (the Micro-Image-Scanner) This is a mirror version of a dove prism.
When the mirror set moves at a distance of ?x, rays move at a distance of 2?x.
Images will be inverted up and down.
In this design, a movement of 9.3µm(approximately 10µm) corresponds to a field change of 0.1”.
This configuration is complex
Uses 3 mirrors
Large scan field requires bigger mirrors.
19. Two-mirror scanner Pros : 2 mirrors – smaller than 3.
Cons : Rays must be changed; change in direction or in position.
20. Gerenalized 2-mirror scanner Pros : The angle between incident beam and outward beam is variable( 0~180° ).
a scanner movement of ?x makes a field shift of
Small ? makes ?(field)/?x small - precise scan is possible, while it requires longer mirror size.
Example) When GH=24mm and ?=22.5°, DF=32.9mm
Minimum mirror size = DF + RH + RD
21. Motion control - procedure
22. Motion control - motor Tip-tilt : Piezoelectric tip-tilt unit
Two-mirrored : linear motor
Rotational motor with worm gear
Inaccurate, friction, wearing down, dust.
Linear motor
Accurate(nm scale), no friction, repeatability, long life
To select appropriate linear motor, motor type( cored or coreless ), mover weight, positioning resolution, maximum velocity and stroke should be carefully considered.
23. Expected scanning performance For ?=22.5°(Beam reflects by 90°.) case, all length-related values are multiplied by sqrt(2).
24. Future Works
26. Tip-tilt mirror scanner
27. Problems of different incident angle Each field goes to different mirror position.
As the mirror tilts, chief ray angle of entering beam differs. Therefore, a field change makes different incident angle.
( 0.48° for 43” field difference )? 32.5A shift(12mm) at the CCD