170 likes | 258 Views
Returning to the Source* MHD Disk Winds, Binaries and Jets as Agents of PN Shaping. Adam Frank University of Rochester F. Garcia-Arredondo, E. Blackman. Beyond the GISW. APNII 1999 – GISW can not recover many PN shapes.(*) Shaping begins during pPN stage.
E N D
Returning to the Source*MHD Disk Winds, Binaries and Jets as Agents of PN Shaping Adam Frank University of Rochester F. Garcia-Arredondo, E. Blackman
Beyond the GISW • APNII 1999 – • GISW can not recover many PN shapes.(*) • Shaping begins during pPN stage. • Momentum Deficits (Burjarrabal 01) • If this bears out may be THE critical result for us!
MHD Wind Launching 2 Versions of Models • Rapidly Rotating Magnetized Core (no binary needed*) • Blackman et al Nature 2001 • Matt, Blackman & Frank 2003 • Magnetized Accretion Disk (need binary) • Blackman, Frank & Welch 2001 • Disk forms around primary (Companion disrupted) (Soker, Livio, Reyes-Ruiz, Lopez) • Disk forms around companion (Soker, Livio etc)
MHD Disk Winds • Soker & Livio (1994) say Disk = Jet. • For PNe conditions this requires Strong Magnetic Field! • Fast Magnetic Rotator (Not Chevalier & Luo 1994 Models) Can we apply MHD Disk Wind Theory to PNe type accretion disks?
MHD Disk Winds Frank & Blackman 2003 Begin with disk parameters (Acc. Rate etc.) • Step 1: Steady Axisymmetric MHD Eq. • Disk radius r0, disk height h, Rotation W0 • Step 2: Derive Alfven Radius rA • Step 3: Derive Uinf and Mass Loss Rate • Step 4: Derive BA from dynamo (ass)
MHD Disk Winds • Results for PN Disks • (T=105 K, L=5000 Lsol, r/h=10, ass = .1) • Md = 10-6 Msol/y
MHD Disk Winds • Results for pPN Disks • (T=104 K, L=5000 Lsol, r/h=10, ass = .1) • Md = 10-4 Msol/y
MHD Disk Winds • Use Reyes-Ruiz & Lopez 99 disk model. • Recover pPN Momentum and Energy.
Jets in Binary Systems (Garcia-Arredondo & Frank 2003) • Jets or Collimated Fast Winds (CFW) from orbiting companion must propagte through expanding AGB wind • Soker & Rapport 2000, Livio & Soker 2002 • Goal: Explore flow pattern within 400 AU of source. • Requires AMR (Yaguzua, Raga et al 2000)
Deflection and Disruption Key parameter: ratio of momentum between AGB wind and Jet Use isothermal EOS c = .63, 5 a = 10o
Strong Jet Case: c = .625 • Flow bounded by U or V shaped shocks in AGB wind • Tcross < Torb. No corkscrew. • Spiral shocks and High density at midplane
Strong Jet Case: c = .63 • Strong AGB/Jet Entrainment.
Weak Jet Case: c = 5 • Flow bounded by U or V shaped shocks in AGB wind • Significant bending and disruption (“Sideways” shocks) • Complex flow pattern (Donkey Ear Shells)
Weak Jet Case: c = 5 • Strong AGB/Jet Entrainment.
Weak Jet Case: c = 5 Density Isosurfaces • Strong AGB/Jet Entrainment.
Conclusions • MHD Disk Winds can power PN • MHD Disk Winds can power high momentum pPN (* need high acc. rate) • CFW/AGB interaction complex but promising. • Need more numerical exploration of binary scenarios.