340 likes | 558 Views
Student Priorities. Graduate Student Government Student Government Association Senior Leadership Team January 26, 2012. Overview of Graduate Student Body & Priorities. Methodology & Response Understanding our Graduate Population Top Funding P riorities Summary.
E N D
Student Priorities Graduate Student Government Student Government Association Senior Leadership Team January 26, 2012
Overview of Graduate Student Body & Priorities • Methodology & Response • Understanding our Graduate Population • Top Funding Priorities • Summary
I. Graduate Survey Methodology & Response • Online survey launched December 5, 2011; closed January 16, 2012. • Robust discussion of initial survey results at 1/23 Graduate Senate Meeting • Total of 374 respondents (15% rate of return) • Instruction Format: 87% Classroom; 4% Online; 9% Hybrid • CPS students were excluded from this year’s survey • Demographics collected • College • Current degree objectives • Teaching/Research Assistantship • Housing Situation
II. Understanding our Graduate Population • Deciding Factors in Choosing Northeastern • Rating the Northeastern Experience • Learning Outside of Class • Communication with Faculty Advisors • Housing Decisions
AttractionsConcerns Deciding Factors in Choosing Northeastern
AcademicsJob Search Support “Excellent” “Good” “Average” “Fair” “Poor” How do students rate their Northeastern experience?
How are students learning outside of class? • 60% have conducted research with faculty members • 57% have applied their knowledge in a non-academic setting • 49% attended an academic conference in the last year • 41% have networked with Northeastern alumni in their field • 22% presented a paper or poster at a conference • 9% have published as a first author, 8% as a second author
Living SituationWhy not living on campus Current Housing Status
III. Top Graduate Budget & Program Priorities Graduate Student Government
1. Increase Financial Assistance – The Data: • 69%of students ranked “Stipends for unpaid coops/internships” as “Extremely” or “Very Important” • 56% of students ranked “Conference Funding” as “Extremely” or “Very Important” • 44% said they had “No other sources of conference funding” than GSG • GSG lacks the capacity to continue as the lone source of funding for almost half of graduate students (Per student assistance has decreased by almost half compared to last year) • 44% of students who sought assistance in searching/applying for grants, scholarships and fellowships rated their experience as “fair” or “poor” Graduate Student Government
1. Increase Financial Assistance • Programmatic assistance in fellowship/grant application process • Workshops on writing winning grant proposals • Panel discussions from Professors/Students who have won major grants • Increased communication re: fellowship/scholarship opportunities from Financial Aid Office • Commitment from College Deans and Department Chairs • Allocate funding for stipends to support unpaid coops/internships • Increase funding support for conference attendance
2. Increase Space On Campus – The Data: • 65% of students ranked “Additional/Improved Space (lounges, study rooms, etc)” as “Extremely” or “Very Important” • A recent Graduate Senate discussion highlighted the need for exclusive graduate-level study space during undergraduate finals periods • 55% of students’ reservations about attending NU were tied to housing concerns • 30% related to the high cost of living in Boston • 13% related to challenges in commuting to/from campus • 12% related to lack of overall housing availability near campus • 68% of students’ reasons for not living on campus were tied to inadequate housing stock (no desire to live in undergrad-style “dorms;” belief that cost/quality of NU housing not competitive with open market)
2. Increase Space On Campus • Designate existing study/lounge space on campus to “Graduate-level Only,” especially during undergraduate final exam periods • Include high-quality Graduate-level housing as a priority in the new Master Plan
3. Improve Career Development – The Data: • Career Advancement Challenges • 64% of PhD and 50% of MA students report they have not had the opportunity to network with NU alumni in their field in the last year • 43% of PhD students have not published as a first or co-author • 36% of graduate students rated their assistance with searching and applying for post-graduate employment as “fair” or “poor” • Advisor Communication Update
3. Improve Career Development • Encourage faculty advisors to take initiative in reaching out to students on their advisement rolls • Work with the alumni center/career center to foster graduate student alumni networking events and on-going mentor programs • Provide incentives for faculty members to publish with graduate students as their second author
4. Increase Support for TAs/RAs – The Data: • Continue to Improve/Increase Trainings • 26% of Teaching and Research Assistants reported they received no training from either the University and their departments. • 56% reported their training from the University as “excellent” or “good” • 66% reported their training from their departments as “excellent” or “good”
4. Increase Support for TAs/RAs • Continue efforts to improve TA training and teaching seminars, roundtables, etc. • Ensure TA/RA stipend amounts are competitive with other schools • Incorporate TA office space into Master Plan
IV. Summary • Northeastern’s Graduate students lead dynamic lives, balancing academics with other priorities • Graduate Student Budget Priorities • Increase Financial Assistance • Increase On-campus Space • Improve Career Development • Increase Support for Graduate Teaching and Research Assistants • Balancing small scale solutions that make a big impact and investing for the future of Northeastern • Questions?
Student Priorities Assessment • Initial Assessment: Committee research/ general student engagement • Evaluation: Open December 5th - January 9th • 1924 responses • Representative across colleges • Representative among years, except for lesser response from Seniors • 40% chose much lessened standard tuition increase for much fewer improvements
Demographics Which Northeastern Branding do You most identify with? • 67% of co-op students leave campus before 8am38% return after 6pm • 85% are involved in at least 1 student organization • 63% are involved in 2 or more student organizations
Credit Monitoring Plus One Masters Ongoing Priorities 2011: 51% not aware 2012: 40% not aware 43% interested in pursuing a Plus One Masters +1 MBA/Psychology most popular suggestions • Do not monitor credit • 2011 & 2012: 45% • Very or moderately important to monitor credit • 2011: 90% • 2012: 87% • Reasons why students do not: • Do not know how to • Costs too much money • Do not have a credit card
Office Accessibility Not Meeting Needs • Academic Advising • - 2011: 21% • - 2012: 16% • Financial Aid Advising • - 2011: 37% • - 2012: 17% • Co-op Advising • -2011: 13% • -2012: 9%
Top 6 Priorities Ranked 1, 2 or 3 • Course Registration improvements/ Waiting List (42.76%) • Study Spaces/ Hours (42.09%) • Instructor Language/Communication Skills (37.16%) • Classroom Upgrades (35.02%) • Academic Technology (32.67%) • Printing Services Expansion (30.63%)
Course Registration Improvements/ Waiting List • Course Waiting List • 87% very or moderately likely to use • Students indicated difficulties with determining what professors use in place of an official course waiting list Course Registration • Concerns about registration times occurring only during class/ coop hours. (Between 8am-4pm currently) • Concerns about registration times determined solely by credits. (AP Credits)
Study Spaces • Preferred Study Times • - 76% 5pm-8pm • - 85% 8pm-10pm • - 74% 10pm-12am • Preferred Location • - 82% Library • - 75% Residence (On/Off Campus) • - 42% Quiet Study Rooms • Group Size Preference • 57% groups of 3-4 • 52% pairs • 78% alone • Resources Utilized • 87% Electrical Outlets • 71% Computer • 56% White Board
Instructor Language/Communication Skills • Instructor Training/Communication Barriers • 78% taken course where instructor’s ability to communicate affected understanding of course material • 70% rate courses taught by Teaching Assistants are somewhat or much worse than full-time instructors • Instructors appear to not have access to sufficient training in the operation and use of currently available classroom technology • Examples: Blackboard and Projector use
Classroom Upgrades • Upgrades most requested: 56 % chair replacements and 58% electrical outlets • 200/300/458 Richards • Architecture Studio: Plotters, Printers, Laser- cutters • Technology upgrades: Ryder • 201 Mugar • Hurtig Science Labs • Snell Basement Classrooms
Academic Technology • Tegrity • Expansion of recorded course lectures to other colleges • 72% very or moderately likely to refer to course recordings when preparing for exams • Rosetta Stone • 75% very or moderately likely to utilize if made available through MyNEU • Provided at a nominal cost to students • Increased Software Availability • 92% very or moderately likely to use Microsoft Office or Adobe Creative Suite if made available to download through MyNEU • 21% rate current MyApps system as excellent or good
Printing Services Expansion • Printing Offerings • 80% would use color, 59% resume printing • 74% willing to use 2 to 3 pages of print allowance for 1 page of color/resume printing • Expanded Printing Locations • Additional stations: • Curry • Shillman • Behrakis • West Village A or H • Ryder
Other Takeaways Communication Resources • Campus Announcements & Events • 32% very or moderately confident that they are aware of campus announcements • 23% very or moderately confident that they are aware of campus events • Effective Methods of Communication • 85% Email • 66% MyNEU • 64% Word of Mouth • Student-run Media • 4% reported student-run media as most-effective • Student-run media improvements:54% focus on newspaper22% focus on television