1 / 13

High-Frequency GW Sources

High-Frequency GW Sources. Bernard F Schutz Albert Einstein Institute – Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, Golm, Germany and Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK http://www.aei.mpg.de schutz@aei.mpg.de. Ground-based GW Astronomy.

payton
Download Presentation

High-Frequency GW Sources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High-Frequency GW Sources Bernard F Schutz Albert Einstein Institute – Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, Golm, Germany and Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK http://www.aei.mpg.de schutz@aei.mpg.de

  2. Ground-based GW Astronomy • Existing detectors (cryogenic bars, prototype interferometers, TAMA300) have not seen anything so far. • First-generation interferometric detectors (LIGO, GEO600, VIRGO) will operate soon at sensitivity h ~ 10-21, but may not make detections. • Second-generation detectors (Advanced LIGO, upgraded VIRGO, planned JGWO in Japan?) should reach the sensitivity needed for frequent detections of binary inspiral. • For many potential sources, we cannot even reliably predict sensitivity level needed: pulsars, supernovae, stochastic background. See comprehensive review: Cutler & Thorne, gr-qc/0204090 (GR16 Proceedings). • Focus in this talk on two topics: spinning neutron stars, and sources in the intermediate frequency band (0.1-10 Hz).

  3. Spinning Neutron Stars • Continuous-wave (cw) radiation; expect low amplitudes, require long integration times • Many objects with known frequency and position (pulsars), some more with known positions (X-ray sources) • Great interest in detecting radiation: physics of such stars is poorly understood. • After 35 years we still don’t know what makes pulsars pulse. • Interior properties not understood: equation of state, superfluidity, conductivity, solid core, source of magnetic field. • May not even be neutron stars: strange matter!

  4. 1s noise in 1-year observation Crab log(h) J1540-6919 J1952+3252 LIGO I J0437-4715 LIGO II J1744-1134 log(f/Hz) Upper limits on some known pulsars

  5. How could pulsars radiate? • Crustal asymmetries. Cutler & Thorne: LIGO II will see any with ellipticity e > 2 x 10-7 (fkHz)-2rkpc. Standard NS crust models predict e < 10-5, plausibly much smaller. Likely that young neutron stars are well below spindown limit. • Wobbling neutron stars. If a star is tri-axial, it may precess as it spins(Cutler & Jones). GWs emitted at spin+precession frequency. Effective e < 10-7. • Non-standard stars. If stars have solid cores and/or strange-star equations of state, ellipticities can be larger by factors of perhaps 100. • R-modes. Viscosity from hyperons in core, plus nonlinear effects, seem to overwhelm instability for young stars; not so clear for millisecond pulsars. Strange stars may be strongly unstable. (Owen, Lindblom, Andersson, Kokkotas, …)

  6. New mechanism: toriodal B-field flip • Cutler (gr-qc/02060521) adds new twist: Bt has longitudinal tension, squeezing equator inwards, producing prolate crust. This competes with the rotation-induced oblateness, but the crustal strength is low, so it is not hard for Bt to win. • A rigid or elastic prolate body spinning about its long axis will, on a secular timescale, re-orient to spin about a short axis. • Cutler speculates that this can happen even when only the crust is elastic. • Pulsar B-fields not understood, but dynamos require toroidal fields Bt. • When pulsar is formed, strong differential rotation could wind up poloidal field, creating much stronger toroidal component. Near-perfect MHD could sustain this field subsequently. • Bonazzola, Gourgoulhon and collaborators (1995/6) considered gw emission due to distortions created directly by such fields.

  7. Natural pulsar model • Cutler’s model leads naturally to geometry where poloidal field is in the spin equator. • Put in numbers, find it can account for entire spindown of millisecond pulsars, and could sustain Wagoner/Bildsten mechanism for LMXB spins. • Caveats: (1) Does not account for all spindown of young pulsars. (2) Need to assume Bp is not perpendicular to Bt (cf Earth field offset angle).

  8. Searching for pulsars • LAL library contains codes for making directed and wide-area searches for cw signals. Codes contributed by AEI pulsar group led by M-A Papa, includes A Sintes, S Berukoff, C Aulbert. • FFT-like searches performed by Coherent Demodulation Code, which begins with short-period FFTs (~1 hr, signal modulation not visible), and constructs matched filter demodulation by adding them coherently with appropriate phases. • CDC filters for both phase and amplitude modulation. Uses ephemeris code contributed by Cutler. Key feature: works entirely in narrow frequency band, so is ideal for parallel architectures. Can perform arbitrarily long “FFT”. • Wide-area searches need hierarchical methods. The Hough Transform Code starts with ~1 day demodulated power spectra and does pattern-finding on frequency peaks over ~100 days. • Benchmarks and Grid experiments on teraflop clusters: late 2002.

  9. Intermediate-Band Sources • Between ground-based and LISA frequency ranges is the poorly-covered intermediate frequency band, 0.1 Hz – 10 Hz. • A future LISA follow-on mission might target this band because it is relatively clear of “foreground” sources, a good place to look for a cosmological background. • Such a mission would need Sh = 10-48 Hz-1 to reach Wgw = 10-14 in a single detector, but only Sh = 10-44 Hz-1 if two detectors were cross-correlated for one year. (Compare to LISA design Sh = 10-40 Hz-1 at 10 mHz.)

  10. Foreground sources What sources might live in this band (cf Ungarelli & Vecchio)? • NS-NS coalescences, NS-BH/BH-BH coalescences for BH masses below 105 M. • Bursts from formation by collapse of 300-1000 M black holes (Fryer et al 2001). • Slow pulsars, magnetars. • Exotica, eg cosmic string kinks and cusps (Damour & Vilenkin 2001).

  11. Chirps in the intermediate band

  12. Chirp sensitivity of LISA follow-on instrument in intermediate band Assume Sh = 10-44 Hz-1 between 0.1 and 10 Hz, observation lasts up to one year, chirping binary at z = 1. log(SNR) Binary chirp mass (solar)

  13. log(SNR) Binary chirp mass (solar) Chirp sensitivity of LISA follow-on instrument in intermediate band. II

More Related