100 likes | 237 Views
How family doctors can be misled by drug companies. An example concerning antibiotic therapy for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections. Dr. Guido Giustetto. Florence (ITALY) 27 - 30 August 2006. The booklet “Use the best first”. Italian family doctors received the revolutionary news:
E N D
How family doctors can be misled by drug companies An example concerning antibiotic therapy for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections Dr. Guido Giustetto Florence (ITALY) 27 - 30 August 2006
The booklet “Use the best first” Italian family doctors received the revolutionary news: a workshop at The Istituto Superiore di Sanità states that for upper respiratory tract infections • to be effective • to avoid antimicrobial resistence it is necessary to use, from the very beginning, a powerful wide spectrum antibiotic like moxifloxacin.
What does literature say ? • Literature doesn’t support these theses • On the contrary, it advises us to: • Use less antibiotics (the CDC estimates that antibiotic prescribing would be reduced by more than 40%) • Wait before starting therapy • Choose a narrow-spectrum antibiotic, if antibiotic is necessary • Save the new antibiotics for severe conditions
What the “real” objective ? • To widen the use of moxifloxacin from labelled indications (sinusitis only) to any upper respiratory tract infection • To increase the drug sales
3 communication tecnique tricks • I Data manipulation • II Recourse to a third party • III Use of a trademark
Communication trick No. 1 To distort the picture with: • a mixture of correct information and • over-alarming statements • misleading references to tables in the text • deliberately truncated quotations • evocative and allusive words
Communication trick No. 2 • Recourse to a third party to make the statements more credible and reliable. 40 specialists Paul Erlich (deceased in 1915) Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Communication trick No. 3 The logotype has been invented: USE THE BEST FIRST this iconic element strengthens the verbal aspect in favour of a long lasting memorization of the message
Conclusion This booklet • is not a scientific instrument • is a misleading promotion pubblication • attempts to interfere with the doctors’ independent and appropriate therapeutic choice • goes against the patients’ best interest
Conclusion In this booklet marketing comes before science