70 likes | 84 Views
Internet Congestion Control Research Group (ICCRG). IETF 69 – Chicago – July 2007. Agenda. Chairs – draft-irtf-iccrg-cc-rfcs (5 minutes) Dimitri Papadimitriou – ICCRG Open Research Problems draft (20 minutes) Chairs – ICCRG Expert Reviews for the IETF (10 minutes)
E N D
Internet Congestion Control Research Group (ICCRG) IETF 69 – Chicago – July 2007
Agenda • Chairs – draft-irtf-iccrg-cc-rfcs (5 minutes) • Dimitri Papadimitriou – ICCRG Open Research Problems draft (20 minutes) • Chairs – ICCRG Expert Reviews for the IETF (10 minutes) • Murari Sridharan – Compound TCP (20 minutes) • Cesar Marcondes – Recent Congestion Control Work at UCLA (20 minutes) • Vijay Subramanian – Update on Loss-Tolerant TCP Work (20 minutes) • Dirceu Cavendish – Lossless Congestion Control (20 minutes)
draft-irtf-iccrg-cc-rfcs • Comments on -01 draft from: Sally Floyd, Stephen Farrell, Gorry Fairhurst, Lars Eggert, Mark Allman • For -02, in several places we added supporting references and/or reworded text • Added more “historic” RFCs (970 and 1016) • Thinking about whether/how to add more on QoS
Open Research Issues Document • Our charter says we’ll document open issues in congestion control • List of issues was gathered at our meeting earlier this year and on mailing list • draft-irtf-iccrg-welzl-congestion-control-open-research-00 • Dimitri will discuss …
ICCRG Expert Reviewsfor the IETF • Basis is ion-tsv-alt-cc • TCPM, TSVWG, and others will redirect experimental congestion control proposals to us first • we analyze under what conditions the proposals seem safe to use • the IETF ultimately decides whether to adopt proposals and publish them as RFCs • several proposals are expected to take this path in the coming months toward Experimental RFCs
Review Content • Answer question: • “In what environments does this seem safe?” • Make safety statements similar to those in QuickStart or HighSpeed RFCs (4782 & 3649) • Evaluate each proposal independently • not a deathmatch competition! • Some guidelines: • draft-irtf-tmrg-metrics • draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt
Timelines • Would like to get these done relatively fast • Need to be responsive to both WGs and authors of proposals • IETF process may take longer • changes might be iterated back through us • Workload may increase review times • Set a goal for 4 months from the time we’re asked to start