1 / 19

WFCAM Photometric Calibration

This overview discusses the conversion from WFCAM counts to Vega magnitudes in the MKO-NIR system, with the goal of achieving 2% accuracy. It addresses challenges such as scattered light, flatfield errors, and extinction time dependence. It also explores the use of primary and secondary standards for calibration.

pearsona
Download Presentation

WFCAM Photometric Calibration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WFCAM Photometric Calibration Simon Hodgkin ++

  2. Overview • Conversion from WFCAM counts to Vega magnitudes at airmass unity in the MKO-NIR system • The goal is to achieve this to 2% accuracy (UKIDSS) • J = ZPJ – Jinst – kJ (Χ – 1) strictly kJ = kJ’ + kJ’’(J – K)

  3. Flies in the ointment • spatial systematics • scattered light • flatfield errors • variable pixel scale • geometrical – vignetting/secondary reflectivity • extinction colour dependence • extinction time dependence • chip-to-chip gain dependence • chip-to-chip QE colour effects • filter colour terms (4 filters)

  4. Scattered Light in WFI WFI V-band observation of a Landolt standard field. Right hand panel shows the results of applying a quadratic correction term: Δmag = a ( ζ2 + η2 )

  5. Scattered Light in INT ? • Landolt field centred on each chip (chip#4 twice – offset for clarity) • Plot of distance from rotator centre with size of bar equal to delta magnitude • No evidence for systematic variation in delta-magnitude with spatial position. • Note that ESO WFI at CASS with multi-element corrector, while INT WFC at prime with fewer reflections

  6. Primary Standards • JAC are observing standards with the Mauna Kea consortium filter set in UFTI (Simons and Tokunaga 2002, Tokunaga et al. 2002) • >100 UKIRT standards with (JHK)MKO-NIR which will not saturate a 1s WFCAM exposure (about 50 for a 5s exp) http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/JACpublic/UKIRT/astronomy/calib/fs_izjhklm.dat • WFCAM uses the same JHK filter system • Preliminary results show persistence effects are small (2e-4 after 20s) • The UKIRT standards therefore make excellent primary standards for WFCAM • Y,Z and narrow-band filters require extra work

  7. Funny Filters • YZ define new passbands • YZ can be bootstrapped into the Vega system • Requires observations of primary standards over a wide range of colours to define the ZP • Can then tie secondary fields into the same system • Narrowband filters (H2, Br-γ, CO) require observations of flux standards first

  8. Secondary Standards • By defining standard fields we: • Beat down the noise • Allow for variables • Can measure spatial systematics • Can measure colour-terms (can change) • Calibrate 4 detectors simultaneously • Choosing fields: • Spaced every 2 hours in RA • Equatorial (good for VISTA) • δ=+20 degrees (X=1.0) • Range of colours • How many stars? 100s? 1000s?

  9. Initial Strategy • Observe UKIRT standards with each chip: • Chip-to-chip gain • Colour equations • Meso-step star field across array: • Spatial systematics • Begin programme to define secondary standards

  10. Long Term Strategy • Repeat measurements of secondary standard fields (>3 measurements per field) • Monitor spatial systematics (esp. as WFCAM comes off/on) • Monitor colour equations

  11. Nightly Calibration • Overheads • E.g. ( (3x5s) +20s ) x 5 filters + slew + acq • 5s S/N=100 J=15 (5 min total) • 30s S/N=100 J=16 (11min total) • Frequency • Depends on stability of a photometric night: hourly ? 2-hourly ? • Extinction • Do we measure it – nightly/hourly/at all ? • Or do we observe standards close to targets

  12. Possible standard fields • Around UKIRT standards • 100s of stars, measured simul. with primary std • Mostly red • Near Galactic Plane (5h45+18, 7h15+00, 17h50+00, 20h30+18) • 1000s of stars, avoid worst crowding • Mostly red • Globular clusters (NGC5053, M3) • Horizontal branch for blue stars • Small, dense cores • Open clusters (Pleiades, Praesepe) • Numerous, large areal coverage • Not many stars

  13. NGC5053: 2MASS J 8arcminutes

  14. NGC5053 source counts

  15. The Globular M3

  16. M3 Source Counts

  17. Gal Plane: 1000 (red) stars 5h45m+18d (l=190, b=-6)

  18. Galactic Plane Field

  19. Pre-WFCAM observations? • How photometrically stable is MKO, e.g. with humidity? • How does extinction vary with time on a wet vs dry night? • Enough data to investigate this?

More Related