1 / 8

Models of admission: standardized vs. university-specific exams Peer-effects in education

Models of admission: standardized vs. university-specific exams Peer-effects in education. Seminar 5 Ilya Prakhov Research fellow, Centre for Institutional Studies. Higher School of Economics , Moscow , 201 2 www.hse.ru. Models of transition “High school – University”. Definitions:

peigi
Download Presentation

Models of admission: standardized vs. university-specific exams Peer-effects in education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Models of admission: standardized vs. university-specific examsPeer-effects in education Seminar 5 IlyaPrakhov Research fellow, Centre for Institutional Studies Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012 www.hse.ru

  2. Models of transition “High school – University” • Definitions: • Centralized educational system – system which is operated according to rules and standards elaborated by the State • Decentralized educational system – universities are free to set up an admission policy • Selectivity – a set of criteria and admission requirements intended for selection of eligible students photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012

  3. Models of transition “High school – University” • Accessibility (affordability) of higher education – integral index, which includes tuition fee at the university, the presence of direct and indirect financial support, academic performance requirements for the student. photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012

  4. Models of transition “High school – University” photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012

  5. Presentation • Warren J.R., Grodsky E. State High School Exit Examinations and Postsecondary Labor Market Outcomes • Why higher education policy concerning exit exams should affect the wages gap? photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012

  6. Presentation • Stinebrikner R., Stinebrickner T. What Can Be Learned about Peer Effects Using College Roommates? Evidence from New Survey Data and Students from Disadvantaged Backgrounds // Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 90, 2006, pp. 1435-1454. • Oosterbeek H., van Ewijk R. Gender Peer Effects in University: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2010-113/3. 2010. photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012

  7. For the next seminar • Heckman J., Masterov D. The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children • Kremer M., Miguel E., Thornton R., Friedman W. Education as Liberation? photo photo photo Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012

  8. 20, Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, Russia, 101000 Tel.: +7 (495) 628-8829, Fax: +7 (495) 628-7931 www.hse.ru

More Related