1 / 26

Rebekah K Nix Senior Lecturer, UTD Terry Barksdale Digital Librarian, UTTC

MEETING in the MIDDLE. mid dle. GROSS injustice. may 23-25, 2007 austin, tx. Rebekah K Nix Senior Lecturer, UTD Terry Barksdale Digital Librarian, UTTC. The formula for water: H to O. WOWOLFOL. How are arithmetic and a telephone alike?. What is H, I, J, K,

pennie
Download Presentation

Rebekah K Nix Senior Lecturer, UTD Terry Barksdale Digital Librarian, UTTC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MEETING in the MIDDLE mid dle GROSS injustice may 23-25, 2007 austin, tx Rebekah K Nix Senior Lecturer, UTD Terry Barksdale Digital Librarian, UTTC The formula for water: H to O WOWOLFOL How are arithmetic and a telephone alike? What is H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O? just144ice

  2. Presentation Objectives • To talk about the difference between instruction and integration (focus) • To share insights on how faculty/staff perspectives changed (design) • To show examples of how course design supported the new model (implementation) • To report on student outcomes and faculty/staff satisfaction (evaluation)

  3. Participant Backgrounds

  4. 36-hour degree • thesis-only option ProgramDesign • completely online • 100% asynchronous

  5. Goal: Lifelong Learners “To teach someone any subject adequately, the subject must be embedded in all the elements that give it meaning. People must have a way to relate to the subject in terms of what is personally important” (Caine & Caine, 1994, p. 64). Harris, S. (1991). Can't you guys read? Cartoons on academia. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION.

  6. Focus: Instruction v Integration

  7. IOL 2005 Keynote Address Focus: “Educational Technology” • Technology-based and Distance Learning Strategies. The Condition of Education in Rural Schools. • Dede, C. • (in press). Washington, DC: Center for Rural Education, U.S. Department of Education

  8. Focus: “Information Technology” • Librarian on Board: Why You Shouldn't Develop an Online Course Without One • C. Laverty and D. Stockley • Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, Vol. 2(4) 2005, pp. 41-55

  9. Focus: “Information Literacy” • Information Literacy as a Liberal Art: Enlightenment proposals for a new curriculum • J.J. Shapiro and S.K. Hughes • Educom Review, Sequence: Volume 31, Number 2

  10. Design: Outcomes + Satisfaction

  11. Design: Faculty v Staff Perspectives

  12. Design: The 3 Cs Communication | Collaboration | Creativity May 05 June-July 05 August 05 05 05 Jan 06 06 May 06 July 06 August 06 December 06 T & R starting talking at IOL C & R outlined course design grids T & R met with M at UT Austin R discovered S on meeting with L C & R added library column with T’s ideas Project Team review meeting C, R, & S reviewed course sequence, discussed resources, shared textbook T visited UTD to meet with R, C, and S S added content; R added disclaimer SCE 5305 launched in Fall semester C, R, & Scelebrated semester success and discussed new ideas for SCE 5308

  13. Design: Ideas + Examples • Course ideas • Roles (Instructor/Student) • Design (Announcements) • Discussion board (forum) • Course menu (external link) • Library examples • Web resources (UTTC/UTD) • Student inquiries (email/chat) • Learning Resources (organization) • Future trends!

  14. Implementation: Course Roles • Instructor • Content • Student • Context • Instructor • Delivery

  15. Implementation: Course Design • Announcements

  16. Implementation: Discussion Board • Library forum

  17. Implementation: Course Menu • External link

  18. Implementation: Web Resources • UTD • About • Resources • How to’s • Services • UTTC • Materials & Resources • Contact a Librarian • UTTC Digital Library FAQs • Faculty Services

  19. Implementation: Student Inquiries • Email • Chat

  20. Implementation: UTTC Organizations • UTTC Organization

  21. Implementation: Future trends! • Grokker search • Pariture FAQ • Seamless access • TDL project

  22. “No Significant Difference” (0T1 v 501) • Student Differences • Learning Style • Teaching Style • Personality Profile • Student Achievement • Textbook Reading Quizzes • Midterm Project Summary • Final Course Grade • Student Performance • Literature Review Paper • Persuasive Presentation • Research Study Proposal • Student Perceptions • Resource Literacy Efficacy • Resource Literacy Attitude • Resource Literacy Skills • Learning Environment

  23. The REFERENCE LIBRARIAN provided timely and accurate information in support of my coursework. “I have seen a broader and more legitimate set of references in the research papers than in previous classes.” Dr. Cynthia Ledbetter, Fa06/Sp07 (has taught sequence since 1987) Rating of ‘Library Liaison’ (0T1) N = 9 Fa06 students 3 = no response given

  24. 100 250 Faculty/StaffAccesses 250 1000 1000 2500

  25. Faculty/Staff Collaboration Distance – Science Education – Reference – Teacher Development – Literacy

  26. mid dle FOCUS DESIGN may 23-25, 2007 austin, tx IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION Rebekah K Nix rnix@utdallas.edu Terry Barksdale tbarksdale@utsystem.edu

More Related