110 likes | 245 Views
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA SAN PABLO VICTOR ARROYO victor.arroyo@ucsp.edu.pe. When More Is Less : The Paradox of Choice in Search Engine Use. Antti Oulasvirta, Janne P. Hukkinen Helsinki University of Technology TKK. Barry Schwartz Psychology Department Swarthmore College. OVERVIEW.
E N D
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA SAN PABLO VICTOR ARROYO victor.arroyo@ucsp.edu.pe When More IsLess:The Paradox of Choice in Search Engine Use • Antti Oulasvirta, Janne P. Hukkinen • Helsinki University of Technology TKK Barry Schwartz PsychologyDepartment SwarthmoreCollege
OVERVIEW • Introduction • Choice Among Results • Method • Results • Conclusion
Introduction Choice Among Results Method Results Conclusion The Paradox of Choice in Search Engine Use • Google • Theparadox of choice
Introduction Choice Among Results Method Results Conclusion The Paradox of Choice in Search Engine Use • Phase 1: Attraction • Phase 2: Choice n(n-1)/2 • Phase 3: Evaluation
Introduction Choice Among Results Method Results Conclusion The Paradox of Choice in Search Engine Use • Participants • Experimental design • Materials • Procedure
Introduction Choice Among Results Method Results Conclusion The Paradox of Choice in Search Engine Use • Satisfaction • Confidence • Carefulness • Suitability
Introduction Choice Among Results Method Results Conclusion The Paradox of Choice in Search Engine Use • Wefoundthat a six-item search result list was associated with higher satisfaction, confidence, and perceived carefulness than a 24-item list. • The paradox of choice has important implications for the design of searchengineresults.