240 likes | 250 Views
This research study explores the use of culturally relevant ecology and learning progressions to improve environmental literacy in teaching the carbon cycle.
E N D
Teaching Experiments and a Carbon Cycle Learning Progression 2009 AERA Presentation Written by: Lindsey Mohan and Andy Anderson (Michigan State University) Culturally relevant ecology, learning progressions and environmental literacy Long Term Ecological Research Math Science Partnership April 2009 Disclaimer: This research is supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation: Targeted Partnership: Culturally relevant ecology, learning progressions and environmental literacy (NSF-0832173). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Teaching Experiments and a Carbon Cycle Learning Progression Lindsey Mohan & Andy Anderson Michigan State University
Knowledge Carbon Cycle LP Discourse Practice Carbon Cycle Learning Progression Framework
Knowledge Carbon Cycle LP Discourse Practice Carbon Cycle Learning Progression Framework Level 1: Force-Dynamic Level 4: Principles
Knowledge Carbon Cycle LP Discourse Practice Carbon Cycle Learning Progression Framework Level 1: Actors and events Level 4: Processes that generate, transform, and oxidize organic carbon
Knowledge Carbon Cycle LP Discourse Practice Carbon Cycle Learning Progression Framework Inquiry: Investigating Accounts: Explaining, Predicting Citizenship: Decision-Making
Units of Analysis Learning Performances: the characteristics of students who are at a particular Level of Achievement and reasoning about a particular practice, process, and principle.
Units of Analysis Learning Performances: the specific practices characteristic of students who are at a particular Level of Achievement and reasoning about a particular practice, process, and principle. Accounts of processes: Example: Explanation of matter during photosynthesis
Current “Structure-First” Learning Progression Level 4: Principled Accounts of Processes in a Hierarchy of Scales (successful constraints) Level 3: Detailed narratives with unsuccessful constraints Level 2: Hidden mechanisms about events Level 1: Macroscopic Force-Dynamic Narratives about Actors and Events
Desired “Principles-First” Learning Progression Level 4: Principled Accounts of Processes in a Hierarchy of Scales (successful constraints) Level 3: Detailed narratives with unsuccessful constraints Level 3: Principled accounts at molecular scale w/ few chemical details Level 2: Hidden mechanisms about events Level 2: Successful conservation at macroscopic scale Level 1: Macroscopic Force-Dynamic Narratives about Actors and Events
Aspects of Starting Knowledge Level 1 • Visible Event • Accomplished byActors • WithPowers or Abilities • Trying to achievePurposes Needs or Enablers Results: Achieving Purpose
Aspects of Starting Knowledge Level 4 • Process • Occurs inSystems • Hierarchically Organized byScales • FollowsPrinciples: • Conservation of matter • Conservation of energy Energy Input Energy Output Matter Input Matter Output
Aspects of Starting Knowledge Characteristics from levels Level 1: Enablers that actors need to achieve their goals (include materials, energy forms, and conditions) Level 2: Gas-gas and solid-solid cycles; macroscopic energy forms (light, heat, motion) Level 3: Atoms, molecules, chemical change, cellular processes, etc
Tools for Reasoning: Principles • Principles: • Conservation of Matter (Atoms, Mass) • Conservation of Energy • Energy Degradation • Hierarchy of Scales
Tools for Principles: Matter, Energy, & Scale Process Tool
0.1m Flames
20mm One flame
2mm Parts of the flame
50nm Molecules inside flame
Click pink square to see animation Atom re-arrangement in combustion
Thank You! http://edr1.educ.msu.edu/EnvironmentalLit/index.htm