1 / 17

US Joint Forces Command Briefing to the Precision Strike Association

US Joint Forces Command Briefing to the Precision Strike Association. CAPT Mark Chicoine Deputy Director J9 US Joint Forces Command. J9 Mission.

Download Presentation

US Joint Forces Command Briefing to the Precision Strike Association

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. US Joint Forces CommandBriefing to the Precision Strike Association CAPT Mark Chicoine Deputy Director J9 US Joint Forces Command

  2. J9 Mission Coordinate DoD CDE efforts and lead the development, exploration and assessment of new joint concepts, organizational structures and emerging technologies through a process of discovery, innovation, adaptation and integration to drive transformation changes that achieve the optimal futureJoint force capability.

  3. Focus Program Objective Memorandum Highly adaptive solutions to current problems Revolutionary solutions to future challenges Disruptive Innovation Concepts Where most Concept Development and Experimentation is focused Today’s Operational Demands Experimentation Prototypes Degree of change Incremental Enhancement Incremental enhancements to current capabilities Evolutionary solutions to future challenges Program Objective Memorandum years Extended Planning Period time

  4. FY 06 FY 05 FY 04 Joint Prototype Path FY 02 Include our Combatant Commands, Services, Defense Agencies and Multinational partners; collaborate in experimentation activities FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 Joint Concept Development and Experimentation Strategy (FY 04-05) • Leverage Combatant Commander Exercises and Operations • Leverage Service Sponsored Wargames and Seminars • Field the Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ) – including the enabling concepts for developing transformational joint command and control • Deliver rapid, prototyping of capabilities to improve joint warfighting now Observations & Insights Experimentation Future Studies, Wargames, and Estimates Millennium Challenge Concept Development Current Operations; Lessons Learned • Joint Concepts (Joint Operations Concepts, Joint Operating Concepts, and Joint Integrating Concepts) • Future joint capabilities Joint Concept Development Path • Leverage Combatant Commander Exercises and Operations • Leverage Service Sponsored Wargames and Seminars

  5. JCD&E Experimentation Domains

  6. A Vision for J9 Discovery Teamwork Promote competition of ideas, rigorous experimentation, broad and thorough research, and open collaboration Value contributions to the US JFCOM team of Multinational, Services, Agencies and Industry players to better meet Warfighter requirements Joint Warfighter Innovation Introduce new methods and capabilities to the Warfighter through concept development and experimentation Adaptation Adapt fundamental strengths and leverage cultural, Service and institutional capabilities as missions dictate, to enhance operational capability Integration Ensure coherent, interdependent functions operate effectively and efficiently to satisfy Warfighter requirements. Multinational Interagency A transformed Joint Force, decisive across all domains against all threats Aerospace Information …to Future … Present Concepts & Capabilities Ground Sea

  7. Intelligence Estimates Labs Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrator Studies Wargames “Urban Resolve 04” Joint Concept Development and Experimentation “Shop Floor” “Sea Viking 04” Models & Simulations “Joint Operational Environment.” Net Assessments Limited Objective Experiments Afghanistan Iraq Combatant Commands Global War on Terrorism “Stability Operations Concept…” “Operational Net Assessment & Effects Based Operations efforts for Afghanistan & Korea” Joint Concept Development Revision Plan Services Bosnia & Kosovo Interagency Peacekeeping Multinational Korea Getting onto the J9 Joint Concept Development & Experimentation “Shop Floor” Experimentation (Director J9) Future Studies, Wargames, and Estimates Developing solutions to Capability Gaps Process Shortcomings Operational Shortfalls Concept Development Current Operations; Lessons Learned

  8. Functional Combatant Commands Regional Combatant Commands INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Regional Combatant Command C2 Links C2 Links Integrating & Coordinating Links Integrating & Coordinating Links JOINT TASK FORCE INTERAGENCY Force Application Focused Logistics Protection Battlespace Awareness Command & Control Network Centric Ops Training Force Management Multinational3 Multinational2 Multinationaln Multinational1 Coalition X Coalition X Coalition X Coalition X Integrating & Coordinating Links Integrating & Coordinating Links MILITARY ALLIANCES NON-GOV’T ORGs Operational Links … JFLCC JFMCC JFACC JFSOCC JPOTF JCMOTF Disclaimer: representative type organizations that could be involved but are not at this time… no relationship exists currently Scenarios / Simulations The Goal Block III Block IV Moving to… Mission/Task CJTF Future SECDEF Integrating & Coordinating Links Integrating & Coordinating Links CJCS MILITARY COALITIONS ACTD Experiment . . . . Wargame Wargame Experiment ACTD ACTD Experiment Wargame Block III

  9. Functional Combatant Commands Regional Combatant Commands INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Regional Combatant Command C2 Links C2 Links Integrating & Coordinating Links Integrating & Coordinating Links INTERAGENCY Multinationaln Multinational1 Multinational3 Multinational2 Coalition X Coalition X Coalition X Coalition X Integrating & Coordinating Links Integrating & Coordinating Links MILITARY ALLIANCES NON-GOV’T ORGs … Disclaimer: representative type organizations that could be involved but are not at this time… no relationship exists currently Scenarios / Simulations The Goal Block III Block IV Moving to… Mission/Task CJTF Future SECDEF Integrating & Coordinating Links Integrating & Coordinating Links CJCS MILITARY COALITIONS JOINT TASK FORCE ? . . . . Operational Links JFLCC JFMCC JFACC JFSOCC JPOTF JCMOTF Block III

  10. Before • Differing Service definitions of “Joint” • Separate Service experimentation • Internal Service assessments • Conflicting concepts • Non-interoperable capabilities Deconflict Service Wargaming Now Coordinate at Service Seams Integrate Service Capabilities “JOINT CONTEXT” Common problem set Consistent scenarios Shared joint concepts Transparent analysis Full joint participation Joint Wargaming Expand Joint Context • Common starting point for force development • Collaborative, co-sponsored joint experimentation • Shared assessment of results • Co-evolution of Joint and Service concepts • Precluding, not resolving interoperability problems Next step Interdependent, Collaborative Learning & Adaptive Coherently Joint Force Effects Based Outcomes “Joint, Interagency, Multinational Context for Wargaming

  11. Distribute the Wargaming Environment • Joint Force Maritime Component Commander, Newport, R.I. • Joint Force Land Component Commander, Carlisle Barracks, PA • Interagency Collaboration Hub, Washington, DC • Joint Force Air Component Commander, Langley AFB, VA • Joint Task Force Headquarters, Norfolk, VA • Regional Combatant Command Headquarters • Joint Force Special Operations Commander, McDill AFB, FL

  12. Joint Fires Initiative – 2 Overview and Status

  13. Provide Joint Force Commanders the ability to employ the weapon of their choosing at the time and place of their choosing. Provide the Joint Force Commander the ability to employ the weapon of his choosing at the time and place of his choosing. Why a JFI - 2 Reduce the Joint Force Commanders’ kill chain for immediate targets during rapid linear and non-linear operations

  14. JFI-2 Partners • Service programs of record • Web Enabled Engagement Management Capability (WEEMC) • Naval Fires Control System (NFCS) • Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS) • Joint Programs Sustainment and Development Program Office (JPSDPO) • Joint Automated Deep Operations Coordination System (JADOCS) • Air, Land, Sea Application Center (ALSA) • Service Doctrine Centers • USPACOM/USSOCOM

  15. FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 JFI Prototype Overview Millennium Challenge 02 Operation Iraqi Freedom Internal Look 03 JROC Memo Transition JFI-1 Lessons Learned Review Users Conference Talisman Saber 05 Terminal Fury 05 TCP Submission JFI LOE JFI-2 Today

  16. The JFI-2 Roadmap Sep 04 Oct 04 Nov 04 Dec 04 Jan 05 Apr 05 Jun 05 Aug 05 RCC OPERATIONAL EXERCISES TECHNICAL (Simulation) (Live Fire) (Simulation) Talisman Saber 05 10-30 Jun 05 Terminal Fury 05 3-11 Dec 04 Limited Objective Experiment 13-24 Sep 04 • Controlled environment • Tool kit assessment • CONOPS solutions • Field environment • Employ CONOPS • Final validation • Free play environment • Warfighters’ assessment • CONOPS validation Warfighting Assessment and Analysis Jul/Aug 05 Technical and Functional Analysis Oct/Nov 04 Operational Assessment and Analysis Jan/Feb 05 Products: -Final analysis report -Warfighter assessment report -Decision brief (JFCOM) -DOTMLPF Change Recommendation -JROC brief (TBD) Products: -Operational analysis report -Warfighter assessment report - Results brief (JFCOM) Products: -Quick look report -Technical analysis report -Results brief (JFCOM) Critical Operational Fixes and Refine JFI Functional Critical Fixes Critical Recommendations

  17. Discussion

More Related