1 / 17

Can Behavioral Obesity Treatment Outcomes be Enhanced with a “Booster” Model?

Jennifer Pells, Ph.D. Clinical Director, Structure House Durham, NC. Can Behavioral Obesity Treatment Outcomes be Enhanced with a “Booster” Model?. Objectives. Brief review of lifestyle-based (behavioral) weight maintenance

petersh
Download Presentation

Can Behavioral Obesity Treatment Outcomes be Enhanced with a “Booster” Model?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Jennifer Pells, Ph.D. Clinical Director, Structure House Durham, NC Can Behavioral Obesity Treatment Outcomes be Enhanced with a “Booster” Model?

  2. Objectives • Brief review of lifestyle-based (behavioral) weight maintenance • Describe intervention evaluated in this study (Structure House program) • Present preliminary results related to maintenance visits • Discussion and future directions • Consider new ways of thinking about weight loss maintenance and ongoing treatment

  3. Challenges of Weight Maintenance • Sustaining necessary behavioral changes (eating and physical activity), including self-monitoring • Metabolic adaptations to weight reduction that promote regain • Managing ‘obesogenic’ environment

  4. Typical Outcomes • Most adults completing a standard behavioral weight management program will lose 5-10% of initial body weight • Most will regain ~1/3 of their lost weight within the first year after treatment and return to baseline weight within 3-5 years • Those who are successful at maintaining initial weight loss utilize a variety of strategies to limit dietary intake and increase physical activity • Those who maintain for 2-5 years have greatly increased likelihood of ongoing, long-term maintenance

  5. Example of Treatment Trial with Maintenance Program

  6. Aims of Current Study • Conduct preliminary analysis of self-initiated maintenance treatment (“return visits”) following initial residentially-based weight loss treatment • Describe pattern of return visits and associations between return visits and weight loss • Compare weight loss for individuals who completed return visits vs. no return visits

  7. Intervention • Residentially-based • Multidisciplinary • Behavioral/Cognitive-Behavioral • Chronic disease/Lifelong • Empirically-supported nutritional, fitness, & behavioral components • Self-referred & self-pay • 28-day average initial LOS

  8. Typical 4-week Results: Initial Treatment • Weight/BMI Males: 5.9% body wt reduction (average 19 lbs) Females: 5.1% body wt reduction (average 13 lbs) • Medical Triglycerides: 153 to 123 Total Cholesterol: 184 to 152 (LDL: 105 to 83) Blood Pressure: 117/75 to 111/72 • Psychosocial Improved Mood (Beck Depression Inventory; 0-63) : 17 to 5 Quality of Life (0-100) : 54 to 70

  9. Treatment Sample • 981 cases analyzed from 2008-2013 • 70% female, 30% male; 95% Caucasian • Average age = 50 yrs • Average BMI = 42 (27-80) • 274 had >1 return visit; 707 had 0 return visits • Outcomes evaluated at time of return visit or standardized 12- and 24-month follow-up

  10. Maintenance Intervention: Return Visits • Re-attend classes and groups • Participate in return-oriented clinical activities • Individualize treatment based on specific needs

  11. Return Visit Patterns

  12. No correlation between # of return visits and last-collected weight (r = .11) Greater weight reduction when first return visit occurred within 12 months of initial treatment Return Visits & Weight Loss

  13. Return Visits & Weight Loss

  14. Results: Comparison of Return vs. No Return

  15. Results: Comparison of Return vs. No Return

  16. Summary • Additional treatment, in the form of “booster” sessions (return visits), can enhance weight loss following a residential obesity program • The majority of initial participants, however, did not return to treatment; thus, alternative effective maintenance interventions are likely needed • Longer-term outcomes in this study are consistent with previous studies: maintenance treatment can delay regain but we do not yet have adequate interventions to sustain weight loss/prevent regain • However, intensive initial treatment and critically-timed additional treatment offers promise

  17. jpells@structurehouse.com www.structurehouse.com Questions?

More Related